crown vs lab gruppen |
Post Reply | Page <1 6789> |
Author | |||
Resonance
Registered User Joined: 11 February 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 31 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
i did not read through all the replies but;
had a few labs,had a lot of vz5ks (still have 3 and half ) i made the switch a while back from vz5ks to a more lighter amplifier. tried the labs first(that's why i had a few of them) they did notperform in demanding situations,(bass heavy, high tempo,high paced all day, all night hostile environment like the vz5ks. a few failed miserably. (btw i have used vz5ks since they came out and never had one fail totally on both channels! i had one where someone threw beer in the back of one side that was on fire, then turned it up on the same side that was burning to prevent the beer that was still inside from running down to the good side, and the party continued! the lab is a little cleaner but the crown, except for the weight is a much better all a round sub duty amplifier. i do look at specs, but experience has taught me that performance in the field is the best way to do a comparison. that is the reason why i have no labs, a few vz5ks a shit load of crest 9200s and qsc 9.0s! |
|||
sirck50
Registered User Joined: 01 August 2006 Location: Trinidad and Tobago Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Soooo... u guys are saying that the PKNC XD6000 or XE6000 outperforms the Crown MA5002VZ??..............in one (1u) rack space??
Has anyone actually compared them side to side?
If this is so, I think this will be my next investment.
|
|||
Hello!!!
|
|||
cilla.scope
Old Croc Legs all the way to her bottom.... Joined: 02 October 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2954 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
you would need to define "outperforms" ... but I suspect yes.
Weight: big tick there, any one with a set of scales can check that. Sound quality: massive tick. The PKN are a decent sounding amp, although in my opinion there are still some better sounding ones for mid-tops, but .. the MA5002 is as rough as a badgers arse IMHO, they sound loud and "growly" on bass, but thats mainly because of the distortion. Power output: despite being rough as f*ck the 5002 does deliver the goods, but the PKN does too from what I hear, as do a many other lightweights. Put simply: the MA5002VZ is a solid lump, that does at least deliver what it is supposed to, however it is as a heavy as a dead donkey, and about as rough as they come. If you don't mind the weight, and are playing the sort of music that benefits from a little distortion, they can be a good choice if you can get them cheap enough. If you want clarity, lightweight and efficiency there are many other good modern examples, the PKN stuff being just one. |
|||
My girlfriend thinks I'm a stalker.
Well, she's not exactly my girlfriend yet ... |
|||
sirck50
Registered User Joined: 01 August 2006 Location: Trinidad and Tobago Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Well my concerns are:
1) the power demand on low notes. From all that read so far, the crown delivers what it says power wise, but (again this is what I read) Lab Gruppens (and SOME other light wieght amps) dont really do this cause of various reasons mainly power supply design.
2) Dependability in really demanding situations. In my country (Trinidad) there is Carnival which is three days and we play Soca and Calypso music for over 12 hours each day (on a 40 feet trailer truck). So far here the crowns MA's seem to dominate the industry cause they seem to be the most durable and powerful. I am looking for a light wieght amp that can do this.
3) Weight factor. So far the PKN seems nice.
|
|||
Hello!!!
|
|||
DjLeco
Young Croc Joined: 21 April 2009 Location: Bucharest Status: Offline Points: 817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Very good explanation Peter!
If you want to see how performs Macrotech 5000VZ into dummy load, and severel frequency, look here, I have done alot of tests:
Macrotech (old school amp)
8 ohms testing:
2 ohms/30Hz testing
4 Ohm 100 1000 10000 20000 Hz
8 Ohm 100 1000 10000 20000 Hz
And New School Itech HD series, same power rated, but cannot sustain it, as you will see:
and poor acting at 20Khz and 10Khz above too
|
|||
I'm A Stupid SMART Romanian...
|
|||
specialjustin
Young Croc Joined: 18 November 2006 Status: Offline Points: 555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nice one DjLeco, i didn't really understand alot of what you said, what with your broad Norfolk accent an all
But what was going on in the last clip...what a racket that Itech makes, like an airplane taking off!!
|
|||
sirck50
Registered User Joined: 01 August 2006 Location: Trinidad and Tobago Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So...who has experience with a lightweight amplifier that can compete, or better, surpass, the sheer muscle of a Crown MA5002VZ? And if so, can you state what it is, so others can give reviews too?
|
|||
Hello!!!
|
|||
toastyghost
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 09 January 2007 Location: Manchester Status: Offline Points: 10919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Powersoft K10 |
|||
SBC
Registered User Joined: 25 November 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
+1 |
|||
F.T.S.S.
|
|||
DjLeco
Young Croc Joined: 21 April 2009 Location: Bucharest Status: Offline Points: 817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
@ specialjustin, what I said is the switching amplifier Itech, have poor performance above 1Khz, especially above 10Khz, alot of limmiting and distortion, compairing with the older Macrotech series. Also, Macrotech offer sustained output power, even in 2-4-8 ohms loaded, regarding Itech wich offer big BURST of mSeconds power, finally it can sustain 39Vrms on 4 ohms dummy load (around 400watts/4 ohms sustained, but big 2500watts peak burst power...)
What all of us must understand, is, on today market, they want quantity and profit, quality is on second or even third place, unfortunately...
Compare old school CROWN Macrotech 5000VZ output waveform at 20Khz, at any output power till clipping prag, with the CROWN Itech 5000HD, you'll see alot of distortion, wich the users with "cleanner ears", will tell, the sound is innacurate, no transparency, etc, they are right!!!
That's the difference between years, first they watched for quality and andurrance, today, I let you speak bout' it...
So for bass duty , if we cam use class D , class I or Class TD and classH 2-3-4 step. I personally recomend for mid hi range , purity of AB class.
Need more power, use bridged amp and that's it. Edited by DjLeco - 07 June 2011 at 2:57pm |
|||
I'm A Stupid SMART Romanian...
|
|||
specialjustin
Young Croc Joined: 18 November 2006 Status: Offline Points: 555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Please explain. As far as i can tell it's just alot louder but thinner, which fits my opinion of switching amps.
|
|||
jacethebase
Old Croc Joined: 23 September 2009 Location: Somerset Status: Offline Points: 5699 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Please tell me this is a JOKE!
|
|||
www.wedding-production.co.uk
www.stage2sound.com |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 6789> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |