Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Amp Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - "The" Amplifier Internals thread ...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed"The" Amplifier Internals thread ...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 101102103104105 130>
Author
Message
nineleaves View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 31 August 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:01pm
6 channeling it would require duplication of driver circuitary, additional connectors, fans etc ..by the time youve messed around with that, you may as well have loaded up a pcb design program, solidworks & designed one from scratch LOL ...its just not worth the effort.

most people would be just as well just buy something that isnt a half baked mess in the first place,
Theres some pretty good value amps out there, if you take the time to look. couldnt say this one really qualifys :/

im also a little supprised to see them still using through the hole components, being someone like harman.. youd think with ready access to such machines, it would only make sense to use surface mount components to increase assembly accuracy, minimize labour costs and time. so i can only conclude that they quite litterally repackaged a very old design without updating it at all & relyed on the lowest bidder of chineese/mexican labour to make manual assembly a feaseable proposition for a budget amp Stern Smile


Edited by nineleaves - 24 June 2010 at 1:02pm
Back to Top
soundguymatt View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 25 August 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:30pm
Originally posted by nineleaves nineleaves wrote:

6 channeling it would require duplication of driver circuitary, additional connectors, fans etc ..by the time youve messed around with that, you may as well have loaded up a pcb design program, solidworks & designed one from scratch LOL ...its just not worth the effort.

+1, my comments were more about the space that's wasted inside and my idea of how it could have been better designed. i wouldn't mod the amp - i would start again from the ground up. I could also say that i could have really fit inside a 1U case. a few components would have to change. 
Back to Top
Centauri View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 29 November 2004
Location: Newcastle Aus
Status: Offline
Points: 1792
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:46pm
Originally posted by nineleaves nineleaves wrote:

it would only make sense to use surface mount components to increase assembly accuracy, minimize labour costs and time.


One of my pet peeves - ALL surface mount component use does is reduce manufacturing costs, and significantly increases repair costs, even to the point of making a repair unviable.  Case in point is the Crown XTi I posted photos of recently - output stage emitter resistors consist of 16 .25W surface mount resistors per output device underneath the heatsink assembly.  Far greater cost to muck around replacing these compared to 10 seconds to replace a through-hole 5W resistor......

As things get more complex and cheaper to manufacture, the long term costs of replacement instead of repair is significant, not to mention all the junk going into land fill - profit from sales is all the manufacturers think about these days.....
Back to Top
abeltronics View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 16 July 2009
Location: Norwich
Status: Offline
Points: 265
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:54pm
Originally posted by Centauri Centauri wrote:

Originally posted by nineleaves nineleaves wrote:

it would only make sense to use surface mount components to increase assembly accuracy, minimize labour costs and time.


One of my pet peeves - ALL surface mount component use does is reduce manufacturing costs, and significantly increases repair costs, even to the point of making a repair unviable.  Case in point is the Crown XTi I posted photos of recently - output stage emitter resistors consist of 16 .25W surface mount resistors per output device underneath the heatsink assembly.  Far greater cost to muck around replacing these compared to 10 seconds to replace a through-hole 5W resistor......

As things get more complex and cheaper to manufacture, the long term costs of replacement instead of repair is significant, not to mention all the junk going into land fill - profit from sales is all the manufacturers think about these days.....
 
Minimising production cost is why the Crown retails for about 50p. If you're worried about ease of repair, then buy a more expensive amp.
http://www.abeltronics.co.uk - Electronic Engineers
Back to Top
nineleaves View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 31 August 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 2:39pm
repairing surface mount is a pice of piss; provided 1206 to 805 size packages are the smallest generally used, tweezers and a soldering iron are good friends & make fast work of repairs.
I use them all the time now for designing and making things, first assembly is done entirely by hand & its not all that bad to do frankly.
I used to be a right leaded component fanboy, til i was actually talked into giving it a go; and to be honest, in the end ive found them to be far easier to work with, no fiddling around with wires and cropping them.. just tap, tap with the soldering iron :) ..into the bargain you can also reduce the size of your boards by 1/5th to 1/10th typically :)

The Crown XTI is just badly designed ..certainly from a mechanical engineering point of view. Its simply that their design does not allow easy access to components under any circumstances. however i do suspect that crown would rather you bought another one, than repaired it now.

Frankly though, we need to universally switch over to smt for almost everything, as aside of manufacturing benefits, its the only way the electronics industry is going to reduce its dependance on questionable, cheap labour pools for manual board assembly.
Back to Top
soundguymatt View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 25 August 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 2:57pm
can't computers put components through a board anyway? i've seen it done somewhere. 
Back to Top
nineleaves View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 31 August 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 3:12pm
There are some machines for electronic assembly of leaded components, however they really arent designed with this in mind. in the past ive seen resistors & standard shaped ic packages loaded this way, but it all really goes out the window when you look at how many different variations in package shape and size there is for leaded capacitors. just a nightmare to deal with on setup alone.
Yes, some of the manual work can be taken out this way, but youd still probably find that most of the components would still have to be manually loaded out of practicality. Its an obselete & antiquated stopgap approach.


Edited by nineleaves - 24 June 2010 at 3:38pm
Back to Top
nineleaves View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 31 August 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1327
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 3:39pm
some youtubery of such things.. novel, but slow as hell & only works with axial leaded components it seems:




compared to this:



and for ultimate speed & accuracy stupidity, when placing components you just couldnt by hand, as they are that small:


:)

Edited by nineleaves - 24 June 2010 at 3:59pm
Back to Top
kedwardsleisure View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 20 January 2009
Location: Staffordshire
Status: Offline
Points: 4947
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 8:16pm
Quote being someone like harman.. youd think with ready access to such machines


The XLS are a re-hashed C-Audio product hence the bizarre (though sound) design.
Of course the same board is used throughout the XLS size range, this was another C-Audio touch...remember the SR range that people used to upgrade themselves?
Kevin

North Staffordshire

Back to Top
kedwardsleisure View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 20 January 2009
Location: Staffordshire
Status: Offline
Points: 4947
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 8:17pm


QSC PLX
Kevin

North Staffordshire

Back to Top
abeltronics View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 16 July 2009
Location: Norwich
Status: Offline
Points: 265
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 8:24pm
Originally posted by kedwardsleisure kedwardsleisure wrote:



QSC PLX
 
Well I can't see anything wrong with that....
http://www.abeltronics.co.uk - Electronic Engineers
Back to Top
kedwardsleisure View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 20 January 2009
Location: Staffordshire
Status: Offline
Points: 4947
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2010 at 10:35pm
Guaranteed not to annoy the neighbours, anyhow!
Kevin

North Staffordshire

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 101102103104105 130>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.