"The" Amplifier Internals thread ... |
Post Reply | Page <1 101102103104105 130> |
Author | ||
nineleaves
Young Croc Joined: 31 August 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1327 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:01pm | |
6 channeling it would require duplication of driver circuitary, additional connectors, fans etc ..by the time youve messed around with that, you may as well have loaded up a pcb design program, solidworks & designed one from scratch ...its just not worth the effort.
most people would be just as well just buy something that isnt a half baked mess in the first place, Theres some pretty good value amps out there, if you take the time to look. couldnt say this one really qualifys :/ im also a little supprised to see them still using through the hole components, being someone like harman.. youd think with ready access to such machines, it would only make sense to use surface mount components to increase assembly accuracy, minimize labour costs and time. so i can only conclude that they quite litterally repackaged a very old design without updating it at all & relyed on the lowest bidder of chineese/mexican labour to make manual assembly a feaseable proposition for a budget amp Edited by nineleaves - 24 June 2010 at 1:02pm |
||
soundguymatt
Young Croc Joined: 25 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 688 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:30pm | |
+1, my comments were more about the space that's wasted inside and my idea of how it could have been better designed. i wouldn't mod the amp - i would start again from the ground up. I could also say that i could have really fit inside a 1U case. a few components would have to change.
|
||
Centauri
Old Croc Joined: 29 November 2004 Location: Newcastle Aus Status: Offline Points: 1792 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:46pm | |
One of my pet peeves - ALL surface mount component use does is reduce manufacturing costs, and significantly increases repair costs, even to the point of making a repair unviable. Case in point is the Crown XTi I posted photos of recently - output stage emitter resistors consist of 16 .25W surface mount resistors per output device underneath the heatsink assembly. Far greater cost to muck around replacing these compared to 10 seconds to replace a through-hole 5W resistor...... As things get more complex and cheaper to manufacture, the long term costs of replacement instead of repair is significant, not to mention all the junk going into land fill - profit from sales is all the manufacturers think about these days..... |
||
abeltronics
Registered User Joined: 16 July 2009 Location: Norwich Status: Offline Points: 265 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 1:54pm | |
Minimising production cost is why the Crown retails for about 50p. If you're worried about ease of repair, then buy a more expensive amp.
|
||
http://www.abeltronics.co.uk - Electronic Engineers
|
||
nineleaves
Young Croc Joined: 31 August 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1327 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 2:39pm | |
repairing surface mount is a pice of piss; provided 1206 to 805 size packages are the smallest generally used, tweezers and a soldering iron are good friends & make fast work of repairs.
I use them all the time now for designing and making things, first assembly is done entirely by hand & its not all that bad to do frankly. I used to be a right leaded component fanboy, til i was actually talked into giving it a go; and to be honest, in the end ive found them to be far easier to work with, no fiddling around with wires and cropping them.. just tap, tap with the soldering iron :) ..into the bargain you can also reduce the size of your boards by 1/5th to 1/10th typically :) The Crown XTI is just badly designed ..certainly from a mechanical engineering point of view. Its simply that their design does not allow easy access to components under any circumstances. however i do suspect that crown would rather you bought another one, than repaired it now. Frankly though, we need to universally switch over to smt for almost everything, as aside of manufacturing benefits, its the only way the electronics industry is going to reduce its dependance on questionable, cheap labour pools for manual board assembly. |
||
soundguymatt
Young Croc Joined: 25 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 688 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 2:57pm | |
can't computers put components through a board anyway? i've seen it done somewhere.
|
||
nineleaves
Young Croc Joined: 31 August 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1327 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 3:12pm | |
There are some machines for electronic assembly of leaded components, however they really arent designed with this in mind. in the past ive seen resistors & standard shaped ic packages loaded this way, but it all really goes out the window when you look at how many different variations in package shape and size there is for leaded capacitors. just a nightmare to deal with on setup alone.
Yes, some of the manual work can be taken out this way, but youd still probably find that most of the components would still have to be manually loaded out of practicality. Its an obselete & antiquated stopgap approach. Edited by nineleaves - 24 June 2010 at 3:38pm |
||
nineleaves
Young Croc Joined: 31 August 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1327 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 3:39pm | |
some youtubery of such things.. novel, but slow as hell & only works
with axial leaded components it seems:
compared to this: and for ultimate speed & accuracy stupidity, when placing components you just couldnt by hand, as they are that small: :) Edited by nineleaves - 24 June 2010 at 3:59pm |
||
kedwardsleisure
Old Croc Joined: 20 January 2009 Location: Staffordshire Status: Offline Points: 4947 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 8:16pm | |
The XLS are a re-hashed C-Audio product hence the bizarre (though sound) design. Of course the same board is used throughout the XLS size range, this was another C-Audio touch...remember the SR range that people used to upgrade themselves? |
||
Kevin
North Staffordshire |
||
kedwardsleisure
Old Croc Joined: 20 January 2009 Location: Staffordshire Status: Offline Points: 4947 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 8:17pm | |
QSC PLX |
||
Kevin
North Staffordshire |
||
abeltronics
Registered User Joined: 16 July 2009 Location: Norwich Status: Offline Points: 265 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 8:24pm | |
Well I can't see anything wrong with that....
|
||
http://www.abeltronics.co.uk - Electronic Engineers
|
||
kedwardsleisure
Old Croc Joined: 20 January 2009 Location: Staffordshire Status: Offline Points: 4947 |
Posted: 24 June 2010 at 10:35pm | |
Guaranteed not to annoy the neighbours, anyhow!
|
||
Kevin
North Staffordshire |
||
Post Reply | Page <1 101102103104105 130> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |