|
scoop vid i found on youtube |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
Heathrow_B_line 
Old Croc 
Joined: 11 January 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 7344 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: scoop vid i found on youtubePosted: 06 July 2009 at 6:36pm |
|
Produce a killer sound. Take no prisoners.
|
|
 |
|
|
Caeraphym
Registered User 
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 July 2009 at 11:06pm |
|
Hmm... Could someone explain the reasoning behind those massive sealed boxes contain one lowly/lonely 12" driver? They can be seen dragging one in just before the video cuts out. Other than that looks like it was set to be a nice dance, certainly had plenty of systems there, with enough running Supers I presume. EDIT:
Here^^^
and here^^^ Edited by Caeraphym - 06 July 2009 at 11:18pm |
|
|
|
|
Meshakroots
Registered User
Joined: 28 April 2009 Location: Houston, TX Status: Offline Points: 55 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2009 at 4:40pm |
|
Good question. My guess would be that they made it like that just to have a level plane to put more speakers on top of, but why not load it with 3 or at least 2 x 12"s?
on another note,
I have learned alot on this forum. From coming in here not knowing anything, deciphering all the technical words and phrases, to having a basic understanding of how things work. I thank all of you.
Respect,
Chris Meshak
|
|
|
|
|
bitzo
Registered User
Joined: 20 November 2007 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 977 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2009 at 4:45pm |
|
I think the reason is economic....they have another sealed box loaded with 3 12" so....when the have other mony to buy other 2 12" they cut the baffle and mount the driver. just hypotesys
|
|
|
|
|
Saul
Old Croc
Joined: 15 June 2007 Status: Offline Points: 5912 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2009 at 5:54pm |
|
theres nothing economic about wasting wood on a box that big. It's purely for stacking reasons i reckon.
|
|
|
|
|
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2009 at 8:44pm |
|
maybe its a coffin
|
|
|
|
|
Saul
Old Croc
Joined: 15 June 2007 Status: Offline Points: 5912 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2009 at 10:42pm |
|
ahhhh that's where shortman has gone......
|
|
|
|
|
bitzo
Registered User
Joined: 20 November 2007 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 977 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2009 at 9:21am |
stacking for sure but...we don't know anything about the internals don't have the confirm that they reduce to 1/3 the rear chamber. However I agree that should be better build 2 2x12" or 4 1x12" than 1 3X12" and the same box loaded with a 12", but if you divide the rear volume of this box in 3 part in order to upgrade other 2 woofer doesn't be a wasting solution IMHO. |
|
|
|
|
Dub Defector
Registered User
Joined: 08 January 2008 Location: Devon, UK Status: Offline Points: 801 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 July 2009 at 9:14am |
|
some more of the same sound with the single 12 in a big box:
|
|
|
Rough Every Time... http://www.dubselector.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Saul wrote: