5th Order Bandpass |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||
Ibex
Young Croc Joined: 27 May 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1013 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Maybe, thats the 5th order... they write:
Adding a restriction to the duct assembly outlet created a duct that would now resonate across a wider frequency band (like a vero-vent) and that improved power handling again.
|
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You cant just make the port a funny shape and add another "order" on, read the thread i posted earlier
|
||
Ibex
Young Croc Joined: 27 May 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1013 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I also thought so, cause only the effective port area to port length ratio is essential.
Would a variable or a few different port lenghts add another order?
|
||
Naff_monk
Young Croc Joined: 11 July 2009 Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
minaximal
Old Croc Joined: 26 September 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
looks similar to a karlson coupler slot arangement, shame freddi doesn't post here anymore..
http://forum.speakerplans.com/k-bin-discussion_topic7452_page5.html?KW=karlson+coupler |
||
godathunder
Old Croc Joined: 19 July 2004 Location: wicklow Status: Offline Points: 1834 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
tapering vents to excite a broader resonance; is that not the general concept of karlson cabs?
wheres freddyi when you need him?
|
||
LOUDER THAN LOUD
|
||
godathunder
Old Croc Joined: 19 July 2004 Location: wicklow Status: Offline Points: 1834 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
minaximal, thats a rather freaky coincidence
|
||
LOUDER THAN LOUD
|
||
opus
Registered User Joined: 25 June 2007 Location: Worcester Park Status: Offline Points: 112 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Why?? What does this offer over more popular 4th and 6th order designs ???
|
||
Unknown Enemy
Registered User Joined: 03 October 2007 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just interested in different designs and how they work. Looking at new ways of trying things out. No harm in that surely? |
||
minaximal
Old Croc Joined: 26 September 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
ha! freddyi and his constant karlson pics, hehe |
||
godathunder
Old Croc Joined: 19 July 2004 Location: wicklow Status: Offline Points: 1834 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I always appreciated that they were firing somewhere over my head.
freddy, please come explain; there is a chance that after half a decade of this site indoctrinating me I may finally understand
|
||
LOUDER THAN LOUD
|
||
Phattoo43725
New Member Joined: 02 August 2016 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I was reading the old post by you and wondered if you found any information on the box. I actually built one back in the late 80's early 90's for a friend that had moved from SC and showed me the plans.
It was built , with two chambers, for two 12 inch subs sharing 1.5 cuft of air space in the rear chamber. This chamber was also tapered to make a wedge. The front chamber was tune able with a slot port. The shorter the chamber the harder it hit within the bandwidth. In the time period running Megawattage was crazy talk, so it was ran on around 125 watts of clean power for both subs. It was a beast for that day I would assume that this could be replicated with modern subs that can be placed in a 4th order using the correct sealed air space figures and tuning the slotted portion to the space it is in. Please tell me if you pursue this and send pics. Thx, Phattoo
|
||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |