new top, plan, critics and advices |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
ndreams
Registered User Joined: 30 June 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 01 November 2009 at 8:52pm |
Hello, i´m working in a project of a small new top.
it should working from (250or350 hz) to up, It will count with 2x6.5'' 6g40nd from beyma and 2x1' 2200ti-nd from selenium It´s only the project, the measures are not nery accurated in this momment, but take a look at the picture and say what you people think about it. regards :-) |
|
Music & Audio the biggest addict of our soul.
NN |
|
ceharden
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 05 June 2005 Location: Southampton Status: Offline Points: 11776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The horizontal dispersion of the 6.5" midrange and the 1" HF will be very different.
|
|
james folkes
Old Croc Joined: 08 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
whilst shimmying this over to the new projects forum, a more fitting home where it will not drop off the front page for a while, i shall offer the following thoughts.
you appear to be designing a very compact line array cab... two hf units and two horn loaded 6.5" will go very loud down to about 3-400-ish Hz on that size of horn, then you'll get bugger all underneath it. i would suspect that comb filtering artefacts in the horizontal would be a severe problem from having drivers side by side too... i think for this kind of idea you will need a single 6.5" on a wider dispersion horn and then some other driver/s handling the low mid in either a horn, bandpass horn, tapped horn, bandpass etc. configuration. that low mid section will have to be very potent to justify the rest of the enclosure... have a look at other people's solutions, like rog's new void arcline 12, the martin w8lm, russian forum user black cat's diy line array, or any other number of boxes that use trick methods to get bucketloads of 80-400 Hz from confined spaces. james. |
|
mardy hippy.
|
|
james folkes
Old Croc Joined: 08 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3064 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
re-reading that i think i kind of went off on a tangent...
i second what chris says about the dispersion however, and re-iterate my point about the comb filtering. how do you plan to implement it? ground stacked in multiples? over what other boxes? james.
|
|
mardy hippy.
|
|
ndreams
Registered User Joined: 30 June 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
thank you, ceharden
In the format of the box, yes, it´s true, but I´ve doubled the angle on high freq because on this horn seems to be too direct (litle dispersion) up of 5khz, I hope with this keep a good disp on high, amoung 60º horizontal, and a reasonable disp, even on 90º, i hope, or i´m completly wrong ? thank you |
|
Music & Audio the biggest addict of our soul.
NN |
|
ndreams
Registered User Joined: 30 June 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
hello James Folkes and thanks for your advices,
I´m will stacking 4 units per side, for low/mid, It will be double 15' box hybrid (horn and band pass type) for each top, suspended in the air also. about one 6.5''? that´s an ideia, but then I will stay with too much high's, maybe put only one driver, on the box, thanks |
|
Music & Audio the biggest addict of our soul.
NN |
|
Centauri
Old Croc Joined: 29 November 2004 Location: Newcastle Aus Status: Offline Points: 1792 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As mentioned, there will be interference between the two 6.5" drivers, and this will effectively narrow the dispersion in exactly the same way a line array narrows the vertical dispersion by stacking vertically. A more serious issue will be the distance between the left 6.5" and the HF horn - this will result in cancellations around the crossover frequency. The 6.5's will need to be tucked in as close to the HF as possible, either by vertically stacking the 6.5's (like the Martin boxes) or by putting the HF horn between them (which will still cause narrowing dispersion unless you reduce the overall width).
|
|
staiper
Registered User Joined: 26 February 2004 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 545 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
ndreams
Registered User Joined: 30 June 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
thanks for your advices
I have some beyma 6g40nd on stock, so I must use that ones, but one beyma for two drivers I´ll have too much high freq, So I quick redraw a scatch: But just maybe I don´t have enough spl on mids, comparing if I put them on a horn. the box have 4 ports, for freq. res. of 100hz. take a look: |
|
Music & Audio the biggest addict of our soul.
NN |
|
Centauri
Old Croc Joined: 29 November 2004 Location: Newcastle Aus Status: Offline Points: 1792 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Whilst that configuration will improve the situation at the crossover point, the additional width between the midranges will decrease the horizontal dispersion further. Some boxes with this arrangement utilise an extra crossover where only one of the midrange drivers cover the upper frequencies whilst both drivers operate at lower frequencies. However, this also means that at the HF crossover point you have only one front-loaded midrange trying to keep up with two more efficient HF drivers...
Arranging the midrange drivers in a V as in Staiper's design above can address the dispersion issue, but you still have the low efficiency of front loaded speakers, and the midrange cones also introduce a large discontinuity to the HF wave guide. Covering the midrange drivers with plates having vertical slots (like the JBL Vertec) can reduce this discontinuity and reduce the acoustic width somewhat, but you are still left with low midrange efficiency. Looking at the plan view of Staiper's box above, if the midrange drivers are moved back level with the HF driver, the midrange drivers can then get horn throats which can exit as vertical slots into the main flare either side of the HF wave shaping element - this can give excellent results (have been playing with this configuration myself) but makes for a VERY complex build. |
|
ndreams
Registered User Joined: 30 June 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thak you centauri for your awesome advice, I think I can understand you, I will do a scacth for it.
mean while, for the same dimensions ( lenght and height) as this last box, a crazy, simply, not very certain if it works, for lows, to 350 more and less. it uses a 15'' from beyma 15mw nd, in the paper seems not to be a great speaker but believe almost the boxes i try it, sounds better than 15p1000nd, but don´t have so much power, but is a very light speaker, 3,6Kg. take a look: |
|
Music & Audio the biggest addict of our soul.
NN |
|
ndreams
Registered User Joined: 30 June 2006 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here another draw, what you think about this one,
maybe yes maybe not, that´s the question Whether 'tis waves in the ear to suffer The dbs and watts of outrageous sound, Or to take pressure against a wall of wood, And by opposing end them? To loud: to crazy lolol :-D take a look ;-) |
|
Music & Audio the biggest addict of our soul.
NN |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |