Print Page | Close Window

Hoggs with v18's/pd1850/pd1851

Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Plans
Forum Name: Scoops
Forum Description: One scoop or two ;-)
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=63884
Printed Date: 19 April 2024 at 1:30am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Hoggs with v18's/pd1850/pd1851
Posted By: Night Hawk
Subject: Hoggs with v18's/pd1850/pd1851
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 11:35am
Safe guys, I don't suppose any of you are lucky enough to have access to hoggs and all three of the above drivers do you? I'm wanting to know how much better the sound of the 1851's is than that of the v18 or 1850 when loaded in piggies. Does anyone have any advice they can give me as to what to load them with?

Cheers :)


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">



Replies:
Posted By: bass*en*mass
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 11:50am
you get what you pay for..

ask fuzzylogic or electrikal on here, both had 1850s in their hogs, both have 1851s now.
V18-1000s will work fine aswell, bit more efficient but not the spl of a 1851 in anger.

budget decides, all 3 work well!


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 11:58am
+1
also depends on if you have a good amp to push them , we run 6 hog V18 loaded thru an inf8mk2 they sound great .  

-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 1:12pm
Originally posted by bass*en*mass bass*en*mass wrote:

you get what you pay for..

ask fuzzylogic or electrikal on here, both had 1850s in their hogs, both have 1851s now.
V18-1000s will work fine aswell, bit more efficient but not the spl of a 1851 in anger.

budget decides, all 3 work well!


V18-1000 is a lovely driver.

"bit more efficient but not the spl of a 1851 in anger."

Will test that statement out next week, not in a HOG though. Wink



-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: JR.junior
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 1:19pm
some youtube maybe? Wink

-------------
Support the scoop technology, larger mouth plays louder!


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 2:33pm
Originally posted by JR.junior JR.junior wrote:

some youtube maybe? Wink


Don't think youtube conveys the 40z experience you get witnessing in person, somehow..

But maybe.. LOL


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Autograff
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 3:28pm
V18-1200's sound ok in hogs.


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 February 2012 at 4:05pm
Interesting, nice to know that Elecktrical use 1851's, not heard their rig but they seem very much in-tune with their gear. Infinate 8 with 1851's in the hoggs would be a dream setup if we can get the cash together...

-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Twirl
Date Posted: 25 February 2012 at 7:42pm
I've been finishing off a pair of hogs today, loaded with 51's. Can't help but smile when I hear them. I put a couple of pics in the what have you done to your soundsystem thread.


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 26 February 2012 at 12:45am
Mate, those hogs are beautiful, and with the ES18 on top looks very tidy. What tops are you getting for it?

-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Twirl
Date Posted: 26 February 2012 at 12:49pm


Got some RCF loaded 2x 15" with 2" comps for tops. Dual 15 tops don't seem to get much love round here. I think these sound excellent.


Posted By: turbo7
Date Posted: 27 February 2012 at 8:14pm
All i can say is, i heard 6x hogs pd1850 loaded vs. 4x hogs v-18 1000 loaded, the 6 hogs were splitted into 2 stacks of 3 hogs, the V-18 stack was a 4-hogs stack. Both were running from an Infinite 8 ( 3x pd´s each channel, 2x V-18 each channel ) 

It was surprising that the 4x V-18 1000 hogs completeley owned the 6 pd hogs. I was able to play a bit with parametric eqs to get the right sound out of the pds but it did not work. 

The only tipp i can give is, never play less than 4 hogs !! They are only working in 4+ stacks. The stack of 4 was brutal 


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 2:35pm
Excellent news... Loans are though and we have scraped enough cash to look at loading our hoggs. Can anyone shead any more light onto weather or not 1851's are truly worth almost double that of the v-18's?

In my eyes it's between the v-18's and the 1851's, if I'm going to spend over 300 then I might as well go for the 51's over the 50's.

Has anyone A-B'd these?


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: bass*en*mass
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 2:37pm
fuzzylogic..
elektrical..

..for sure, some others on here too i guess..

If budget is tight V18s would do, 1851s for hooligans only :)

Depends what you are after...



Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 2:42pm
Cheers :)

High quality results. I spoke to Electrikal when I was up in Edinburgh and they suggested 51's for sure.

Would be intreagued what fuzzylogic has to say on the matter though, and some good reasoning as to why one would be better than the other aside from price.

-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: bass*en*mass
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 2:48pm
you simply can push the 51s more than others..

sounds dont differ that much afaik/heard, just the max SPL is increased by using 1851s.
need a strong amp though - they take clean 1500W in hogs..

think qss did some tests on these.


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:02pm
I wonder why no one is considering some more modern drivers like 18NLW9600 or 18SW115?
They should be superior to the PDs.


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:04pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

I wonder why no one is considering some more modern drivers like 18NLW9600 or 18SW115?
They should be superior to the PDs.

Would you mind explaining why please?


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: bass*en*mass
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:20pm
They are almost twice the price in uk, one good point not to go for these :)


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:21pm
Why?

Bigger X-max
Bigger X-damage
Bigger VC
Bigger power
Overall better vc and cone material (aluminum clad wire 4 leyers for the 9600, meaning much better heat dissipation then copper)
Triple suspension vs double suspension
Demodulating rings for lower distortion
Half the weight vs 1851

You need more?


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: ape3435
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:36pm
Don't see no reason to spend twice the amount for an eighteen sound when the PDs does the job, besides, the 18NLW9600 uses more wattage which means bigger amplifier thus more cash...again, and any damage to these would cost a fortune. guess it all depends on location and this is England.


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:48pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

Why?

Bigger X-max
Bigger X-damage
Bigger VC
Bigger power
Overall better vc and cone material (aluminum clad wire 4 leyers for the 9600, meaning much better heat dissipation then copper)
Triple suspension vs double suspension
Demodulating rings for lower distortion
Half the weight vs 1851

You need more?



Was just comparing them then, I guess that's where they are almost another 100 quid again on top of the 51's. That is definitely out of my budget unfortunately. Could sell my kidneys I suppose. 

I do know that V-18's sound very nice in hoggs, as I regularly hear Neverlution spanking theirs here there and everywhere.


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: ape3435
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 3:56pm
There you go then, sorted. If you can afford the 51s then get them, if not get the V18s. If you can purchase bigger wattage amplifiers, find extra cash, then 18sound. for me, the V18s are good.


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 4:08pm
Originally posted by ape3435 ape3435 wrote:

There you go then, sorted. If you can afford the 51s then get them, if not get the V18s. If you can purchase bigger wattage amplifiers, find extra cash, then 18sound. for me, the V18s are good.

This is what I'm trying to get to the route of though, the V-18's are good, but are the pd1851's £120's worth better? Or, would that money that I could save getting the V-18's be better spent on going towards a good quality amp?


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: bass*en*mass
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 4:15pm
again, depends what youre after..
if theres a few sounds around you using v18 loaded ones i would say thats the way to go, if you dont want to link up with them but get a different beast go for 51s.
Amp in both cases should be up for the job...




Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 4:16pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

Why?

Bigger X-max
Bigger X-damage
Bigger VC
Bigger power
Overall better vc and cone material (aluminum clad wire 4 leyers for the 9600, meaning much better heat dissipation then copper)
Triple suspension vs double suspension
Demodulating rings for lower distortion
Half the weight vs 1851

You need more?


All look nice and impressive in the glossy PDF, but when you analyse "the important facts & figures", different story.



Qes                         - Higher than PD1850,  Already indicates lower efficiency
Qts                          -  "         "      "         ,  Will not work well in many "tight" throat scoops
Vas                         -    Very low, will not move as much air in sub range as PD1850
BL                           -      Lower than 1850, so less control
Ref Efficiency (No)    - 1.9255, much less than PD1850(2.88), more power req to match PD O/P
Rear baffle cutout     - 422mm - Will not fit PD cutout,
Total depth              -  237.5mm - Deeper than PD1850, will not fit many cabs designed for PD.

This driver maybe great for dance/pop music,  but is so obvious this driver is not superior to PD1850 in suitable scoops.

Even V18-1000 is superior to this, and that only costs £220 in UK.Wink

Above if is typical for many of the hugely expensive, so called "Neo PD1850 killers", that  just don't meet the hype.







-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 4:23pm
You need to have one of these so you can see and hear with your own eyes.

Again i wonder, if it is such a superior driver and as you say much cheaper, why it is not used anywhere in the major manufacturers boxes? Are they all stupid, or just not as greedy as they seems to be.

And we are comparing 1851 here because people says sounds better in hogs. Now compare 1851 not 1850 with that data you posted on 18NLW9600. You will find is extremely close. With 18Sound being a lot better :-)



-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 4:32pm
I just did some sums and realised that with the amount we have in the bank, I could get 2 v-18's and a proline 3000. A combination I've been aiming for. Would mean I can power half my current rig off the bat.

Would the Proline take 2 v-18's off one channel? I know it's slightly under-powered, is this a huge no-no, or would it suffice as a temporary solution until I can afford another amp for my kicks? (two 186 W bins)


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 4:35pm
Should be just fine.

-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: PauliePaul
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:04pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

I wonder why no one is considering some more modern drivers like 18NLW9600 or 18SW115?
They should be superior to the PDs.
 
Without going on, Tony A.S.S. and I did some tests between the PD.1851 and the 18SW115 around 18 months back. Really and truly there was nothing in it regarding performance apart from the overall tone of the drivers (the PD sounded 'deeper' and from memory was 6 or 8 dB up on the B&C at 44Hz), they outplayed each other at different frequences, but as whole they were basically on par. The two factors that could influence making a choice between the the two drivers would be price (PD wins) and weight (B&C wins).
 
Desirability could also come into it... 10 year old PD.2150's still command strong money, where as I can't get any interest in a near new B&C 21SW150 I have sat here!! 
 
  


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:13pm
6 or 8db up at 44Hz is a huge difference. But again if the box was optimized for the PD then if should be about right result.
And then again i see no apparent reason why the difference will be that big.


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: PauliePaul
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:19pm
It was/is Tony's RX18 Jnr... optimised for the B&C I believe.
 
Just to re-iterate, they out performed each at various other frequencies by 2 or 3 dB, but the 44Hz one is the one that really springs to mind due to the shear difference in performance at that frequency. 


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:23pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

Again i wonder, if it is such a superior driver and as you say much cheaper, why it is not used anywhere in the major manufacturers boxes? Are they all stupid, or just not as greedy as they seems to be.


Not saying PD1850 is the superior of all 18s, it's is just superior at what it does, in chosen applications.

The dance/pop boxes produced by many "major manufacturers", don't need the nuances of the PD1850, no nonsense folded horns like Quake MS18 would.




-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:25pm
Originally posted by PauliePaul PauliePaul wrote:

It was/is Tony's RX18 Jnr... optimised for the B&C I believe.
 
Just to re-iterate, they out performed each at various other frequencies by 2 or 3 dB, but the 44Hz one is the one that really springs to mind due to the shear difference in performance at that frequency. 

As i am aware the RX18 Jnr is optimized for 18TBX100 which is far from 18SW115. So there you go.


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:28pm
BTW here the PD1850 is about 150 eur more then 18sound 18NLW9600.
Now go figure.


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:29pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

6 or 8db up at 44Hz is a huge difference. But again if the box was optimized for the PD then if should be about right result.
And then again i see no apparent reason why the difference will be that big.


Vas & Ref efficiency..

This is why PD will move more air at deeper notes, with higher SPL. parameters reveal all..

Also why I wouldn't need to hear/see the 18 sound driver, if driver is lacking in those two areas compared to the 1850, result is always the same.

This is why many people used to buy new ASS scoops with B&C Neos, and then sell the drivers and get PDs.


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Tekasis
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:30pm
Originally posted by levyte357 levyte357 wrote:

This driver maybe great for dance/pop music 
 
LOL
 
which one?
 


-------------
**Heavy Weight-Line**
A home without books is like a body with no soul.


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:34pm
18SW115 VAS - 189
PD1851 VAS - 182

Woow, a huge diference that is. :-)

What about 12mm vs 15mm xmax and a lot more difference in x-damage? More xmax more displacement isnt it?


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:52pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

18SW115 VAS - 189
PD1851 VAS - 182

Woow, a huge diference that is. :-)

What about 12mm vs 15mm xmax and a lot more difference in x-damage? More xmax more displacement isnt it?


I'm talking about PD1850. Wink


Regarding Xmax/Xdamage, with so many manufacturers fudging this figure, I prefer considering
hc-hg/2, and the driver BL, Vas.

This gives an accurate idea of what will be happening with excursion at high power.

Also, high efficiency cannot be countered by fairy tale Xdamage figures. LOL


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 5:54pm
Originally posted by Tekasis Tekasis wrote:

Originally posted by levyte357 levyte357 wrote:

This driver maybe great for dance/pop music 
 
LOL
 
which one?
 


18sound 18NLW9600

-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Night Hawk
Date Posted: 24 April 2012 at 8:24pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

Should be just fine.
I got my maths wrong. I want to be putting much more than 550w/driver  into my v18-1000's which is what I would be doing if I ran two off one channel.


-------------
http://www.junglesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: tv00
Date Posted: 07 May 2012 at 9:03am
I didn't have the time to do any test, but I do have 4 of Francis-build hogs &:
Void v-1000's, pd.1850's, rtm 1500's AND rcf lf18n451 laying around.

The last one has ok specs I think, at it's only 300 euros & Neo, but the xmax is not as big:
Thiele/Small Parameters
  • DC resistance: 5.0Ω
  • Mechanical factor: 6.0
  • Electrical factor: 0.25
  • Total factor: 0.24
  • BL Factor: 30.2 T · m
  • Effective Moving Mass: 235 g
  • Equivalent Cas air load: 245 liters
  • Effettive piston area: 0.122
  • Max. linear excursion (mathematical): 8.8 mm
  • Voice - coil inductance @ 1kHz: 2.6 mH
  • Half-space efficiency: 2.54%
AND did any of you check out:
rcf lf21n51 with a BL of 39
or the lf15n451 with a Bl of 33,5


Posted By: JR.junior
Date Posted: 07 May 2012 at 9:47am
fs?

-------------
Support the scoop technology, larger mouth plays louder!


Posted By: tv00
Date Posted: 07 May 2012 at 10:03am
fs=31hz

You can easily Look for yourself
=google.com / rcf.it =
http://www.rcf.it/en_US/precision-transducers


Posted By: Tapeworm
Date Posted: 06 June 2012 at 9:25pm
if you were to run two per channel  off a proline 3000 you would be giving them 750w each. wich with a v18 loaded pair of hogs would sound sweet! we ran two of ours off an old wharfdale mp2800 at 8ohms for a while giving them 600 each and never had any complaints. thats the great thing about v18s, they still sound good at lower power, but when you get the amp to spank them, well youve hered ;).....
 
also when you save up for another amp for your kick section you could get 1100 into them each off the proline if you were to use one per channel so its also pretty future proof.
 
another plus of you guys getting v18s, link ups!
 
nuff said :P


-------------
http://www.nslproductions.com/" rel="nofollow - NSLproductions.com

http://www.neverlution.co.uk/" rel="nofollow - neverlution.co.uk


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 5:47am
Have been testing new 5"VC UK driver on the block, and to me, sounds like it drops drop deeper/warmer than PD1850/V18-1000/PD 1851, and also stronger than all 3x.




-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Tapeworm
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 8:53am
What driver would that be lev?

-------------
http://www.nslproductions.com/" rel="nofollow - NSLproductions.com

http://www.neverlution.co.uk/" rel="nofollow - neverlution.co.uk


Posted By: Tapeworm
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 8:56am
ive always wanted to try the Volt RV4514 looks good on paper, but looks like a bugger to re cone, and is quite pricey!

-------------
http://www.nslproductions.com/" rel="nofollow - NSLproductions.com

http://www.neverlution.co.uk/" rel="nofollow - neverlution.co.uk


Posted By: paulus
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 8:59am
best I have heard.hogs was 1851 loaded no way the.void or 1850 can touch it on shear air movement

-------------
TRENDSETTER SOUND SYSTEM


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 11:46am
Originally posted by levyte357 levyte357 wrote:

Have been testing new 5"VC UK driver on the block, and to me, sounds like it drops drop deeper/warmer than PD1850/V18-1000/PD 1851, and also stronger than all 3x.


Originally posted by Tapeworm Tapeworm wrote:

What driver would that be lev?


Now... How to answer this question without starting World War III... Ermm


http://www.onlygoodmovies.com/images/content/saving-private-ryan.jpg


Let's say it's a British Driver (of course LOL), 5 "VC, rated approx 1600W.

Heard loads of them in Golden Palace on Monday night, and if they were PDs, there would have been plenty of speaker smoke filling the air. They are not as sensitive as PDs, but will take enough power to outplay them, and still survive. Heard this for myself.

If I recall correctly, One of the guy's who used to work for PD, designed this monster.




-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: tv00
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 11:54am
My guess would be Celestion CF18VJD
Not too updates with the UK market though, is this a new driver?


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 12:20pm
Originally posted by tv00 tv00 wrote:

My guess would be Celestion CF18VJD
Not too updates with the UK market though, is this a new driver?


Came out late last year.
People will ask, "what's the point of another 1000W+ driver"?

All I can say is, this driver sounds much better than PD1850, and with enough power outplays it, and throws nicely, as opposed to Turbomax.



-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: ermita
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 12:21pm
Embarrassed


Posted By: fuzzylogic
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 2:48pm
Hello,sorry i'm late busy busy an all.

I have tried most of the drivers mentioned and ended up here...
my experience with 18 sound has been very dissapointing,sound cold and hard, don't take the rated power without cooking too easy, cost a small fortune until you come to sell them second-hand then no-one wants them unless very cheap....my advice...don't go there.

If your on a budget you want V18 or the Celestion offering,for the money you get a suprising amount of really good sound,from a driver which handles most you can throw at them.

1850 sounds a little hard also, but more spl than the previous two without a doubt.

If you wanna be in the bigboys league then no exceptions 1851s.
Sheer SPL with depth and ridiclus power handling.
Truly insane amounts of sub,will rinse everything out there....
Until i build the super hog of course.

pot stirred,job done.

Byee!

EDIT have not tried the new Celestion.Sounds like a goer though.Lev knows his stuff,I suggest you give it a try.


-------------

NEIGHBOURHOOD SOUNDSYSTEM
Infinitely baffled.



Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 10:43pm

Originally posted by fuzzylogic fuzzylogic wrote:


I have tried most of the drivers mentioned and ended up here...
my experience with 18 sound has been very dissapointing,sound cold and hard, don't take the rated power without cooking too easy, cost a small fortune until you come to sell them second-hand then no-one wants them unless very cheap....my advice...don't go there.


Yep

Originally posted by fuzzylogic fuzzylogic wrote:


If you wanna be in the bigboys league then no exceptions 1851s.
Sheer SPL with depth and ridiclus power handling.
Truly insane amounts of sub,will rinse everything out there....
Until i build the super hog of course.

pot stirred,job done.

Byee!

EDIT have not tried the new Celestion.Sounds like a goer though.Lev knows his stuff,I suggest you give it a try.


Clap

At recent closed doors test, we compared new Celestion &  PD1851 in my prototype scoops.
Both played warm and very deep, easily better sounding than PD1850 in my books, but obviously not as sensitive.

Consensus at this test was the Celestion "seemed" to be the stronger driver, as it "seemed"  happier playing every note at power.  Obviously not conclusive, as was 1-1 comparison, really needs 2x vs 2x cab scenario.










-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Andy Kos
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 10:58pm
Are there many peoplke out there using the Celestions? From my perspective they dont seem to have aroused the level of interest we expected, certainly would be useful to have some more feedback about it...


-------------
just a guy with a warehouse and a few speakers... www.bluearan.co.uk


Posted By: PauliePaul
Date Posted: 07 June 2012 at 11:08pm
PD.1852's faired very well in the hog too. Two on two with a pair of PD.1850's...
 
PD.1850's had more SPL at lower levels, but were quite harsh in comparison to the PD.1852's, also the PD.1852's played lots of notes that were not apparent when the PD.1850's were playing. More depth, more power, more notes... and throw too - things were moving and shaking 20+ metres away from the cabs.
 
Thumbs Up
 
 
 
 


Posted By: onefootskenk77
Date Posted: 08 June 2012 at 12:37am
PD.1852? Where have I been or am plastered.......

-------------
EMPIRE SOUND


Posted By: Andy Kos
Date Posted: 08 June 2012 at 12:53am
Originally posted by onefootskenk77 onefootskenk77 wrote:

PD.1852? Where have I been or am plastered.......
Prototype only at this stage....
 
If the test results come back positive it will move to production


-------------
just a guy with a warehouse and a few speakers... www.bluearan.co.uk


Posted By: grazzeee
Date Posted: 19 June 2012 at 11:56am
if the results come back positive and they go to production what time frame are we looking at?


Posted By: PauliePaul
Date Posted: 19 June 2012 at 12:04pm
Originally posted by grazzeee grazzeee wrote:

if the results come back positive and they go to production what time frame are we looking at?
Depends how quick I get my act together with more testing.... LOL


Posted By: grazzeee
Date Posted: 19 June 2012 at 12:06pm
:P well best of luck to you on that one. Im still mega excited about getting my four hogs with pd1851s... the thought of it makes me all jittery ha.



Posted By: biotec
Date Posted: 19 June 2012 at 12:21pm
Originally posted by fuzzylogic fuzzylogic wrote:

Hello,sorry i'm late busy busy an all.

I have tried most of the drivers mentioned and ended up here...
my experience with 18 sound has been very dissapointing,sound cold and hard, don't take the rated power without cooking too easy, cost a small fortune until you come to sell them second-hand then no-one wants them unless very cheap....my advice...don't go there.


Hi mate,  which drivers did you try? Did you try the neo 9600?


-------------
me so horny, me love you long throw.


Posted By: suraj@skpl.co.uk
Date Posted: 20 December 2012 at 3:51pm
Hi there all. A little assistance will be appreciated please. We run a roots sound system and have hog scoops loaded with PD 1850's all sounding very nice powered by Crown 5000VZ 2 drivers a side at 4 ohm. Looking at building some new hogs to extend the system, what recomendations can any one give me if I should put PD 1851's on the new hogs or even wait for the PD 1852's to be available?
Also one more thing, I had to drive a 3 hog scoop stack at a particular venue and ran them linked in series at 2.6ohms off a Crown 5000VZ. Unfortunatley they didnt sound very good at all almost very flappy and this was the first time I had linked them like this, they sound fine when normally linked two a side at 4ohm. Wondering if anyone has some thoughts on this.
Many thanks


Posted By: suraj@skpl.co.uk
Date Posted: 20 December 2012 at 3:52pm
Hi, A little assistance will be appreciated please. We run a roots sound system and have hog scoops loaded with PD 1850's all sounding very nice powered by Crown 5000VZ 2 drivers a side at 4 ohm. Looking at building some new hogs to extend the system, what recomendations can any one give me if I should put PD 1851's on the new hogs or even wait for the PD 1852's to be available?
Also one more thing, I had to drive a 3 hog scoop stack at a particular venue and ran them linked in series at 2.6ohms off a Crown 5000VZ. Unfortunatley they didnt sound very good at all almost very flappy and this was the first time I had linked them like this, they sound fine when normally linked two a side at 4ohm. Wondering if anyone has some thoughts on this.
Many thanks


Posted By: levyte357-
Date Posted: 20 December 2012 at 7:37pm
Either 4 ohm stereo, or if driving three, 4 ohm one channel, 8 ohm the other.

If you were running them at 3x at 2.66 ohm, one one channel, down a long cable, that probably isn't very thick, "didn't sound very good" and "flappy", is exactly what you'll get.

Also, the PD1851 is not as sensitive as PD1850, so even though MA5000VZ with half decent supply will give 4x PD1850s good spanking, don't expect the same when driving PD1851s.





-------------
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.


Posted By: suraj@skpl.co.uk
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 8:12am
Hi lev. Thanks for the reply mate.

Ok if running three hogs. Two on one channel at 4ohm and one on one channel at
8ohm. Would both gains on the amp be ok to be set the same as I would not hear the
The difference in sound from the two compaired to the one? Or would it be a case of
Keeping an eye on the amp level indicators?

Also before when I ran 3 at 2.6ohms off one channel the cable was 4mm thick but the
Run was 30meters on the drum. Should that effect the sound to be flappy?

Regarding the 1851 being used in the new hogs. Normally we always have a 32amp supply
In and I would run two a side at 4ohm on the 5000vz. Think they would sound the same
Or better compaired to the existing 1850 hogs x 4?

Cheers


Posted By: levyte357-
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 11:04am
Originally posted by suraj@skpl.co.uk suraj@skpl.co.uk wrote:

Hi lev. Thanks for the reply mate.

Ok if running three hogs. Two on one channel at 4ohm and one on one channel at
8ohm. Would both gains on the amp be ok to be set the same as I would not hear the
The difference in sound from the two compaired to the one? Or would it be a case of
Keeping an eye on the amp level indicators?


Set levels same, and look at indicators anyway. LOL

Originally posted by suraj@skpl.co.uk suraj@skpl.co.uk wrote:


Also before when I ran 3 at 2.6ohms off one channel the cable was 4mm thick but the
Run was 30meters on the drum. Should that effect the sound to be flappy?


Yep. For 25M+, I personally prefer individual pair of cores to each cab, not linked.
8 ohm impedance down 25M of 2.5mm2 has never caused me damping problems or noticeable attenuation of sub.

I can get 25M 8x core 2.5mm2 fairly cheap, so that handles 4x subs in a stack nicely.

-------------
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.


Posted By: turbo7
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 1:08pm
saying this for the second time, well, i love PD, love the company etc.,  i have had PD in Sub and still have em in tops, works excellent for me, but really.... please stop the ongoing "pd is king" thing, its not true and many know it, the bad bwoy 18s on a big digam or pkn in hogs slaps every pd vz5000 whatever amp hog day in and day out, absolutely no chance in pressure - try and you will see for yourself, i say this because i bought pd and v-18 years ago ( even v-18 was a touch better in hog )and dont want the people make the same mistake for kings output and still smooth sound, intelligent setup is needed. I kill every pd sound easily trust me !


Posted By: suraj@skpl.co.uk
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 1:15pm
Greets Turbo. Thanks for the post. Can you give me the exact make and model numbers of drivers u recomend for the hogs. Cheers


Posted By: turbo7
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 2:22pm
fuzzy, what are you talking about lol..... if you had the big bwoy 18s maybe the amp didnt like them or what ?! On big amp and right setting it is a no competition thing ! Not even close to every driver i tested so far... but yes aluminium coil is the thing i would change...

edit: did you note that they need at least 50hours ( i would say even more ) to be run in proper ? Triple spider ! i saw a huge difference between new and run in.

I recommend these because they are soooooooo much better than their contenders and you were dissapointed ( wtf ?! ), you must have had another driver LOL


Posted By: levyte357-
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 3:09pm
Originally posted by turbo7 turbo7 wrote:

fuzzy, what are you talking about lol..... if you had the big bwoy 18s maybe the amp didnt like them or what ?!


Which drivers exactly you're talking about?


-------------
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.


Posted By: turbo7
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 3:39pm
oh i see 18s got some new stuff... 9600 and be aware it is NOT performing out of the box and NOT on vz5000 or any other "standard" amp but if circumstances are right it is hell on earth in a hog. Cant destroy the driver mechanically. Aluminium coil is the only disadvantage but still takes a lot more power than any other speaker mentioned in this thread


Posted By: levyte357-
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 3:44pm
Originally posted by turbo7 turbo7 wrote:

oh i see 18s got some new stuff... 9600 and be aware it is NOT performing out of the box and NOT on vz5000 or any other "standard" amp but if circumstances are right it is hell on earth in a hog. Cant destroy the driver mechanically. Aluminium coil is the only disadvantage but still takes a lot more power than any other speaker mentioned in this thread


Seeing as this thread is about PD1850/1851 in Hog, how about you start another thread about "Hogs + 18 Sound 18NLW9600"

-------------
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.


Posted By: turbo7
Date Posted: 21 December 2012 at 3:57pm
sorry beeing ot but somebody mentioned the driver some sites before in this thread so i thought... just wanted to help and clear things, it is such a no brainer in my eyes if amp is available...

I dont want to say things i dont do after all but we have a soundclash soon, lots of strong systems ( pd, void loaded scoops etc. ) maybe i could make pics write review, i try fellas, have no camera at the moment....


Posted By: Electrikal
Date Posted: 25 April 2013 at 12:33am
Who has tested hogs with the pd1852's yet?


Posted By: PauliePaul
Date Posted: 25 April 2013 at 12:36am
Originally posted by Electrikal Electrikal wrote:

Who has tested hogs with the pd1852's yet?
Two sounds, one in London, one in Leicester - both have placed orders for drivers after testing. 


Posted By: Electrikal
Date Posted: 25 April 2013 at 12:45am
need to build new cabs for them tho :(


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 12 May 2013 at 10:14pm
Originally posted by Electrikal Electrikal wrote:

need to build new cabs for them tho :(

http://www.precision-devices.com/file-downloads/PD1852Datasheet220413.pdf" rel="nofollow - http://www.precision-devices.com/file-downloads/PD1852Datasheet220413.pdf

http://www.precision-devices.com/file-downloads/PD1851Datasheet240413.pdf" rel="nofollow - http://www.precision-devices.com/file-downloads/PD1851Datasheet240413.pdf
they seem to be the same size so i don´t see why you´d charge a thing.



-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: tv00
Date Posted: 13 May 2013 at 11:13am
All of you old hogs are pd.1850 loaded now francis, -you should come and enjoy them some day!


Posted By: Heathrow_B_line
Date Posted: 13 May 2013 at 1:41pm
put an pd1852 in there

-------------
Produce a killer sound. Take no prisoners.


Posted By: tv00
Date Posted: 13 May 2013 at 1:50pm
You give them to me then:-)



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net