![]() |
Signal chain overload effects |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
| Author | |
Muckerbarnes1
Registered User
Joined: 20 March 2010 Location: Stroud Status: Offline Points: 1241 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 February 2012 at 11:41am |
|
Some good work there Mik. Whats next to test?
|
|
|
Billy Dawg. Best Avatar yet!
|
|
![]() |
|
audiomik
Old Croc
Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 1747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 February 2012 at 2:13pm |
|
Re: "Whats next to test?"
Well, this set of results taken from what must be the very best performance DJ Mixer in it's price range. (price taken as advertised within the last 12 Months) Now to start with the same three tone signal applied to a Magnetic Cartridge input of this mixer, the same test as for the Vestax: ![]() lower trace is the input signal and the upper trace the output signal with the Channel and Master Faders both at 'Full' with all LEDS on and 5Volts (true rms) of output. Below is the spectrum of this 'clean' output which compares very well with the Vestax: ![]() Next, the input signal is increased in order to overload the Mixer Input with the output shown as the upper trace in the 'scope image below: ![]() Next is the spectrum of this overloaded input signal for comparison with earlier test results of the Vestax: ![]() Now so far I haven't identified the make or Model of the DJ Mixer which the tests in this post have been run on; only that it is excellent value for money given the results above and the previous thread which covered a number of tests I did to properly compare this with other similar products. OK then! Wait for it! It's one of these ![]() Which were selling at less than £10 each and from the test results in this thread show it is easily a contender for replacing a number of it's vastly more expensive competitors! Some more Test results here Interesting ![]() Mik |
|
|
Rule #1: "there are no such things as problems
...........................only solutions we haven't thought of yet" |
|
![]() |
|
Earplug
Registered User
Joined: 03 January 2012 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 718 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 February 2012 at 4:32pm |
|
Nice one Mick.
And a very pretty mixer that! ![]() |
|
|
Earplugs Are For Wimps!
|
|
![]() |
|
slaz
Registered User
Joined: 27 November 2009 Location: London E2 Status: Offline Points: 1257 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 February 2012 at 4:53pm |
LOVE it :-) People say "you get what you pay for". I say no "you DON'T get what you "DON'T pay for" .... (what's that - the obverse .... subverse ... bin a while since I studied logic :-) ). Anyway - always nice to see something break the "rules" .... |
|
|
REMEMBER....POLITICIANS AND DIAPERS SHOULD BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON
|
|
![]() |
|
audiomik
Old Croc
Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 1747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2012 at 4:52pm |
|
OK then, looks like it's high time to see how the "Rider Friendly" DJ Mixers perform with the same tests!
So is anyone with one of these expensive boxes able to spare about an hour to run and verify the same tests as performed on the other Mixers so we can see properly any differences? The Test Bench is located in South West Bath. Can assure that the tests are non-destructive and that covers etc don't need removal - that is unless we find a fault which needs attention perhaps Please PM if you are able to contribute.... evenings for tests are OK! thanks in advance Mik |
|
|
Rule #1: "there are no such things as problems
...........................only solutions we haven't thought of yet" |
|
![]() |
|
Enigmatic_Lemur
Registered User
Joined: 05 August 2011 Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2012 at 5:36pm |
First picture: Good moustache. Second picture: Terrible moustache! That is all, I apologise. Carry on...
|
|
|
Everything is funny.
|
|
![]() |
|
audiomik
Old Croc
Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 1747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2012 at 5:56pm |
|
Good interpretation!
Can be fun though with one of my Signal Generators to write suitable words into the waveforms which can then be displayed on the 'scope screen........ something for another thread perhaps ![]() Mik |
|
|
Rule #1: "there are no such things as problems
...........................only solutions we haven't thought of yet" |
|
![]() |
|
Muckerbarnes1
Registered User
Joined: 20 March 2010 Location: Stroud Status: Offline Points: 1241 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2012 at 1:25am |
|
Got a spare Formula Sound FSM600 here Mik.
Really, really want a Pioneer DJM though....
|
|
|
Billy Dawg. Best Avatar yet!
|
|
![]() |
|
audiomik
Old Croc
Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 1747 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2012 at 3:40am |
|
I'm sure there must be someone near here who could pop over with a DJM for an hour or so perhaps one evening; can include me showing the owner of it how to test it as well!
Now to put you off with tekky things used to do the tests, here is a pic of the PHAT with some of the instruments I use to do the tests ![]() However whilst this might look really complicated, amongst the stack of instruments are those used to generate the three tone test signal, an oscilloscope for monitoring the input and output signals for the mixer and the Spectrum Analyser to look at the contents of the mixer output for each input level tested. Now a quick explanation of what the Spectrum Analyser shows so that those reading this Thread can see differences between the Mixers being tested. The Spectrum Analyser displays the signal level (vertical) and frequency (horizontal) as a graph with 500 sample lines width between 10Hz and 50kHz, much like the response graphs provided by 'speaker manufacturers for example as it displays the level in dBm of each frequency sampled, not quite in real-time but with much greater resolution than PC based equivalents used for 'speaker tests etc. Firstly, one of the 'clean' signal Spectrum: ![]() The top line on the display is +20dBm and each horizontal line is 10dBm lower with the bottom line of the display at -80dBm - so showing a 100dB range. The Vertical lines are at each decade of the Frequency, starting at 10Hz on the left and increasing to 100kHz although the maximum measurement frequency is actually 50kHz. Here we can see the three test signals combined to the input of the Mixer appearing at it's output as the three large 'peaks' in the display. Two of the signal components are quite close together at 960Hz and 1120Hz and appear as the 'twin peak' on the 1kHz vertical line in the center of the display. Lower down, the various small peaks are the distortion products of these input signals, noise and mains Hum; we could call these the 'unwanted' bits of the Mixer output since a perfect Mixer would have none of these visible. Comparing this display then between different Mixers gives a good idea of their differences in performance using this single measurement. Next is the 'overload' signal Spectrum: ![]() Now this one shows all of the added harmonics and other distortion parts of the Mixer Output Signal with the input overloaded as well as the noise and Hum which is still somewhere amongst it all! Try spotting the higher frequency input signal peaks as these are becoming 'lost' amongst all of the distortion products caused by the overloaded Mixer input! Comparing these displays between the different Mixers tested then gives a good indication of what each Mixer will do when an overloading signal is applied to it's input. Now for all of the Mixer Tests (for the Cloud I used a different test method for this as it was to show what happens to the outputs of the LMS's) I have not adjusted any measurement settings so as to be able to directly see like-for-like results. The Spectrum Analyser is also set to read RMS values for the levels of each frequency component; something I explained in an earlier post in this Thread so we can see the real power being sent to the Amplifiers and Speakers at each frequency. Hope this assists in explaining things further! Mik PS: tis a bit late at night whilst posting this; so please reply with any comments about this test method and/or if I've missed something or not explained things clearly Edited by audiomik - 20 February 2012 at 4:12am |
|
|
Rule #1: "there are no such things as problems
...........................only solutions we haven't thought of yet" |
|
![]() |
|
Earplug
Registered User
Joined: 03 January 2012 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 718 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2012 at 10:11am |
|
Nice stack there, Mick! I just hope the H&S boys don´t come around to visit you, as it all looks a bit dangerous!
![]() |
|
|
Earplugs Are For Wimps!
|
|
![]() |
|
mattneck
Registered User
Joined: 26 June 2008 Location: Bristol Status: Online Points: 90 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2012 at 6:03pm |
|
Mik-not forgot you, but have landed another week down the road here..
In relation tot his thread though, have a DJM500 I've jsut put a new pair of faders in on Ch. 2&3.. Shall I bring that with me to if I haven't handed it back to the guy prior?
|
|
![]() |
|
audiomik
Old Croc
Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 1747 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2012 at 6:17pm |
|
Seems like a good idea, given they are used by a number of Members on here!
Mik |
|
|
Rule #1: "there are no such things as problems
...........................only solutions we haven't thought of yet" |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |