maximum efficiency tapped horns

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   i have a couple of back loaded horn sims that use very little power but have decent output also with basically a smaller horn (shorter with slower flare rate as u desribe and a smaller mouth) and larger  chamber. i think I  have been wondering a simmilar thing to you that staying away from the higher end of how much power u put into your driver becuase these designs reach Xmax quicker (looking at it from how much power is going in not how much output) might very well be better?

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Natty K Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Registered User Joined: 09 April 2009 Location: burwell, UK Status: Offline Points: 461	Post Options Post Reply Quote Natty K Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: maximum efficiency tapped horns Posted: 14 October 2010 at 4:43pm
	i have a couple of back loaded horn sims that use very little power but have decent output also with basically a smaller horn (shorter with slower flare rate as u desribe and a smaller mouth) and larger chamber. i think I have been wondering a simmilar thing to you that staying away from the higher end of how much power u put into your driver becuase these designs reach Xmax quicker (looking at it from how much power is going in not how much output) might very well be better?
	'The most profound technologies are those that disappear. They weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life until they are indistinguishable from it.'

snowflake Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Registered User Joined: 29 December 2004 Status: Offline Points: 636	Post Options Post Reply Quote snowflake Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 13 October 2010 at 3:22pm
	Hi just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on designing for maximum efficiency rather than sensitivity. I have usually designed horns to get a flat sensitivity response and to limit excursion below xmax at all frequencies. I have tried a different approach which is to design the horn to maximise the minimum efficiency within the operating band. I have also been increasing the spec sheet value of Re significantly to account for voice coil heating - as a big voice coil has significant thermal capacity I have assumed Re is approximately doubled at high output. And am not paying as much attention to xmax. designing so that the speaker can reproduce a 50Hz sine wave without exceeding xmax is not what you want it to do in real life. designing this way you get a higher impedance box that is not so thermally limited mid band (50-70Hz). physically the horn is smaller volume than the max sensitivity model with similar low cut. high efficiency seems to require a larger throat and a horn that doesn't flare until over half way down. also big throat chamber seems to help. the idea is that once you have a high efficiency box you can choose a much bigger amp without risking voice coil burn-out. higher impedance will reduce the current required from the amp so less heat issues there. in example I have looked at can raise max output at 65Hz by 6dB. sort out any bumps in the response with parametric eq or leave the bumps there if they happen to be in the right place i.e. where the kick is. It would be really handy if Hornresp could plot efficiency and max output dynamically on the tapped horn wizard screens! cheers Phil