![]() |
12cxn88 design in WinISD |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
osse
Registered User
Joined: 26 August 2013 Location: Sverige Status: Offline Points: 84 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: 12cxn88 design in WinISDPosted: 09 January 2019 at 10:54pm |
|
Hello guys! I'm trying to simulate a BR enclosure with this driver in WinISD, focusing only on the 12" parameters. I have 2 questions:
I've found a compromise of cutoff frequency, port size, enclosure size and port velocity that I like. The thing is that when I apply maximum voltage the driver can take, I'm only utilizing 50% of the Xmax of the driver, is this an indication of a sub-optimal alignment? The box tuning freq is at 80% higher than the driver FS. The simulated response has a 4 dB bump near tuning freq that falls off slowly within 2 octaves upwards. Is this too much of a resonance to sound good? https://www.audioxpress.com/article/test-bench-b-c-speakers-pro-sound-12cxn88-12-coax-driver according to this website the physical xmax of the driver is 5,25 mm, which is much closer to the number I'm getting at full power in WinISD, is this number more accurate/important than whats specified by B&C? Thanks for any advice.
Edited by osse - 09 January 2019 at 11:18pm |
|
![]() |
|
Pasi
Old Croc
Joined: 25 April 2010 Location: Knutsford Status: Offline Points: 2685 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 January 2019 at 8:55am |
|
With a low Qts driver like that, the resonance bump at tuning is indicating too big box and it won't sound good with 4dB peak.
But when you reduce the box volume, your port gets longer... Of course you can go ahead and build one & listen, but i wouldn't personally bother. |
|
![]() |
|
Zead
New Member
Joined: 08 November 2024 Location: Nyc Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2025 at 2:12pm |
|
Hi, wanna do similar design. Mind sharing volume and port size you settled on?
|
|
![]() |
|
Larry23
Registered User
Joined: 07 August 2023 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2025 at 3:26pm |
|
Not sure if this is helpful - the box I modelled for that driver is 40.1l, tuning 55.7hz. F3 is ~53hz. Port velocity ~22 m/s with port area 75mm x 100mm, length 279mm. Seems to give a relatively flat/extended alignment, with good control over cone excursion, and sacrifices as little as pos efficiency wise.
I use the 12NDL88's in similar cabs, slightly different alignment, and they work very well.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |