|
15" Horn to go over X1s |
Post Reply 
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |||
JulianDA 
Registered User 
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: 15" Horn to go over X1sPosted: 15 January 2019 at 12:46pm |
||
|
Hello fellow Speakerheads,
in an attempt to try another Kickbin over X1s to maybe replace our HD15s, i simulated and modelled a small FLH. The Plan was to build a speaker that is half the size of an X1 Letterbox (56,9x50,8x69cm (WxHxD) ), so four Horns will stack neatly onto one to give a nice height for our Tops. Another criteria was a decent frequency response down to 60Hz, so we can use a but24 HPF at roughly 80Hz to meet the X1.
After some time with Hornresp i came up with the following simulation for the existing Oberton 15B450 Speaker. (I simulated in eightspace, because the Horn will mainly be used in a stack of four on the ground or on just one X1 (so roughly on the ground))    This looked promising, so i spend some more time in Autodesk Inventor and put this simulated Horn in a wooden box :P My first design was this slotloaded one:  The problem with this is that there is no way to put the driver in, not enough place for the magnet in the backchamber, a lot of wasted space, and to much crazy angles on small pieces of wood.....so i came up with another idea in the following drawing: Its more simple and doesnt look to bad. The driver can be mounted from the right side, has probably enough room (maybe after some minor changes) and is easily accessible. The only problem is now that i dont know how to put this correctly into Hornresp. I dont think this will change to much of the frequency response because the significant areas are nearly the same and the small loss in lenght should be well compensated by the virtual hornextension in front of the hornmouth.My questions to you are now: - how can i simulate this kind of hornthroat more accurate? - is there another way of folding this horn better in the given space? - can i get an extended frequency response on the high end in comparison to the HD15 even though there are two bends in the horn (we run the HD15 currently to 151Hz and i would like to get to 180Hz without the typical "honkyness" Thanks in advance, Julian |
|||
 |
|||
|
DMorison
Old Croc 
Joined: 14 March 2007 Location: Aberdeen Status: Offline Points: 1617 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2019 at 8:46pm |
||
Use the Offset Driver option in the number of drivers field. You then set S1 to near enough zero (I think 0.1 is the lowest value it accepts), representing the very thinnest end of the "wedge" in front of the driver, with S2 being the sectional area in front of the middle of the driver. Not sure about your other questions, sorry. HTH, David.
|
|||
|
|||
|
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 January 2019 at 10:28am |
||
|
Thank you David, I totally forgot about this feature in Hornresp :D
After some changes to the backchamber to make the driver fit inside, I simulated the horn with an offset driver. Here is the newish design and the simulation results i got:    The thing with this simulation is that i am not sure about the compression ratio of my hornthroat. I didnt want to go over 2:1, because i dont think the driver will like it that much. But with the input for the offset driver i am now at 2,76:1. My gutfeeling tells me, that the actual ratio will be lower in this case because of the volume inside the drivers cone, but i am not sure about that. Another problem might be the asymmetric loading of the cone because of the shallow baffle angle. So first of all, is the Hornresp input for S2 correct like i did it? And can somebody with more experience than me tell me if the loading of the cone is problematic in this case? Edited by JulianDA - 17 January 2019 at 12:53pm |
|||
|
|||
|
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 January 2019 at 2:24pm |
||
|
Because I did not know if i can trust my simulation, my mate an i just build the first prototype yesterday in his garage with the help of some nice techno music
     It is just a quick and dirty OSB board prototype, but i think it turned out good enough :) So today I did the first frequency response measurement in an open field. It is a groundplane measurement taken 4m away from the horn using the Beyerdynamics MM1 microphone and the Steinberg UR12 Soundcard.  Compared to the simulation of just one Horn in 2pi, so standing on the ground, it looks relatively decent.  But as you can see, my simulation shows the frequency dips caused by the driver offset in much lower frequencys. To me this looks like good evidence for my theory that due to the very narrow start of the horn before the driver cutout, and the mounting of the driver on the baffle (so reducing the space even more), the actual offset is just the radius of the cone. Another difference is the predicted low end of the horn vs the measured response. I think i measured more low end because of the virtual hornextension in front of the hornmouth. The last difference is the response dip at roughly 550Hz. This frequency corresponds to a quarter wavelength of around 16cm, so roughly the radius of the cone. I think this will be a cancelation because of the phase difference of the sound generated at both ends of the driver. So by changing the driver offset to the cone radius and adding half the height of the hornmouth to the length of the last segment, i get the following simulation, that really does look like the measurement:  I think this design looks promising and the simulation seems to be spot on. But maybe i draw the wrong conclusions and got the right simulation just by pure luck. Maybe somebody with experience in horn design could tell me if this looks right? And i got one more question: In the measurement you can see a small "ripple" around 133Hz that isnt in the simulation. To me this looks like a resonance caused by a reflection inside the Horn. I concluded that this might be a reflection from the mouth of the horn to the backwall because the quarter wavelength of 133Hz is just under 65cm and my box is 67,5cm deep. Does this explanation sound right? And am i right by thinking this goes away by using more horns in a stack, due to the bigger moutharea and therefore better impedance matching to the sorrounding air? |
|||
|
|||
|
luthier
Registered User
Joined: 21 July 2013 Location: UK - London Status: Offline Points: 271 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 January 2019 at 5:52pm |
||
|
Afraid I'm not experienced enough to really help you out with any of your questions. However, I can say your design looks great, very well thought out and efficient!
Looking at your measurement at first I thought the "ripple" at 133hz would be caused my the microphone, but the manufacturers measurements say it's near perfectly flat. From my understanding peaks in the response will be greatly smoothed out when the horn is used in multiples. The last hornresp sim you posted does show a very small bump around 100hz. Maybe you could manipulate this to match your measurement and work back? |
|||
|
|||
|
gen0me
Young Croc 
Joined: 20 February 2016 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 999 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 January 2019 at 6:07pm |
||
Does it sound muddy, resonative, hard to eq? Try taking the speaker out, than knocking into enclosure. Any similarities?
|
|||
|
I appreciate every like :)) https//www.facebook.com/genomesoundsystems
Mixes: https://www.mixcloud.com/gen-ome/ |
|||
|
|||
|
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 January 2019 at 12:05pm |
||
Thank you! But this is just my first try at designing a horn myself, so I think i will be running in some problems with it that i did not think of :D
To be honest, i can not hear it at all, but i am very bad at hearing this kind of stuff in the lower frequencys  So I fear the knocking-trick will not give me clear results (or just results biased by what i expect/want to hear) But the Idea of Resonances of the Box itself is a good one, thanks! Next weekend i will try to put in more braces (especially in front of the driver) and measure the response again.
 I think the bump at 100Hz is there (what i traced in blue), but its "masked" by the resonance (1) But maybe i see just what i would like to see there  The ripples 2 and 3 look almost exactly like in the simulation (a good sign i think) And what i traced in Orange and circled in yellow is what i believe to be the effect of the angled driver (the phase differences of the sound coming from the opposite sites of the cone, as seen from the perspective of the Horn) Sadly i can just work on the Horn on weekends, so now the only thing i can do is speculate, ask here for help, and do simulations
|
|||
|
|||
|
luthier
Registered User
Joined: 21 July 2013 Location: UK - London Status: Offline Points: 271 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 January 2019 at 11:34pm |
||
|
Interested to know if you've got any further with this?
Edited by luthier - 26 January 2019 at 11:34pm |
|||
|
|||
|
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 January 2019 at 9:47am |
||
|
On Friday i did some more braces infront of the driver and also looked for more resonating panels. But due to the shitty weather here in germany i cant measure if anything changed
I also worked a little bit on our new midtop design containing an 18S 15nmb420, and an 18S nsd1480n on the xt1464 Horn. But this also needs a good measuring Session, so there was not to much progress. In the next two weeks i am busy studying and writing my bachelors degree, so all the projects will have to be paused. After that the work can continue ans i will give you an update of anything interesting that happens :)
|
|||
|
|||
|
ARR_PG
Registered User
Joined: 14 October 2013 Status: Offline Points: 89 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 July 2019 at 6:51pm |
||
|
This is an awesome build man. Will sound better when u build the real one in ply
|
|||
|
|||
|
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 January 2020 at 3:54pm |
||
Thank you! I hope that you will be right :P Now, almost a year after the beginning of this project, i finally have enough time to continue. Over the last few months i worked a lot on my design and i am now at a point where i think that it is ready for the next prototype. But this time in real plywood. I settled with my design of a double 15" Horn, which has the same outside dimensions as our letterbox X1 Subwoofers  I chose this style of Bracing so it is as sturdy as it can be, but i am not so sure about bracing the hornmouth.I dont like the look of braces directly in the mouth of the horn, but if i find out that its necessary, then i will ad them later on.  The following Image shows the expansion of every segment of the Horn. I think i got a good enough approximation of the exponential expansion that is still easy enough to build.  And finally the new simulation of one Horn placed just on the ground vs. 2 Horns on the ground (i did not simulate the virtual hornextension, so the actual response should be a few Hz lower and also a little bit louder around 60-70Hz)  I have just one question about this. Do you think that there will be an noticable improvement in the frequencys around 200Hz if i make the first fold round with some thin and bendy ply? Other then that i am just waiting till my carpenter has time to cut the wood for me. So the new prototype will come in the next weeks. Cheers, Julian :) |
|||
|
|||
|
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 110 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 February 2020 at 2:03pm |
||
|
So, in the last days i did the "pre assembly" of my Horn. I just screwed everything together to check if i made any mistakes in the measurements of all the parts.
To my suprise everything fitted nicely and i just screwed up in two minor places that could be fixed without to much hassle. This is the result:       Today i will finish the Bracing in the Hornmouth and in a few days i will do measurements outside (i will also post measurements of the HD15 loaded with the same driver to compare the two (and maybe a comparison between 1, 2 and 4 HD15)). But from just listening to the new Horn compared to two HD15 (they are on the right side of the door in the last pic) i can say that i like the new one much more! It just sounds cleaner and a little deeper. The HD15 in comparison sound more "muddy". Also the crossover to the tops can be set a lot higher. from listening i would say 200Hz is perfectly reasonable and 250Hz may also be possible. I am more than happy with the result of the first horn i ever developed and will post more updates in the following days/weeks. Cheers, Julian Edited by JulianDA - 01 February 2020 at 2:03pm |
|||
|
|||
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
JulianDA wrote: