400Hz-20KHz horn for BMS 4595 |
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Author | ||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 26 April 2013 at 7:10pm |
|
Ive had the intention of building a 60x30 horn for my BMS coax drivers for a while and got round to doing some calculations and drawing today, i intend to build it from 22 layers of MDF machined by CNC, then lots of sanding and painting.
Its looking like it will be a little less than 60x30 degrees as i dont have quite enough space to fit them in the cases, more like 55x25 now, not the end of the world but i dont really want them any narrower. I went for a linear expansion with 1KHz 1/4 wave mouth termination as i am limited by what i can fit. Path length is 215Hz and im aiming to run them from about 400Hz ish. James |
||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
PavelP
Registered User Joined: 25 March 2011 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 159 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mdf... Try fiberglass on plaster model, its very simple.
400Hz isn't too low? |
||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Im not a big fan of working with fibreglass, MDF horns tend to be dead and very non resonant, and even if i did make them from fibreglass i would have to make the 1st mold from MDF. 400Hz is fine for the BMS.
|
||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
ArthurG
Young Croc Joined: 03 May 2004 Location: France - China Status: Offline Points: 976 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
at HiFi levels yes sure.... but for PA it rips your head off
|
||
MarjanM
Old Croc Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7816 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Making a box with 400Hz cut off wont be very pleasant to listen to at near and loud, but it will be very very good at a distance. So it all depends on what he wants to use it for.
|
||
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
||
Steve_B
Old Croc Joined: 29 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just to clarify things:
Hz is a unit of 1/time, it is not a length. I assume that a
path length of 215Hz means that the length of the horn corresponds to ¼ wavelength
at 215Hz, which would be 40cm. This would agree with the 22 layers of what I
presume will be 18mm mdf, which is 39.6cm. A 60 degree angle results in a plan view of an equilateral
triangle so the mouth width will be the same as the wall length, so about 46cm.
The 1KHz ¼ wavelength termination refers then to the round-over which will be
about 8cm radius. For PA work, I would just curve the flare into the front
baffle rather than continue the curve so it folds back on itself. Basically it
is more practical, and it is similar to the tractrix profile which is deemed OK. One thing that you need to be aware of is that when the
width of the mouth is approximately equal to the wavelength of the sound being
produced, the dispersion pattern will narrow. For your horn this will be around
the 750Hz region. The diagram below shows what happens. It is for a curved
mouth horn (it was the only pic I had readily available) but expect similar
with a flat fronted horn. This narrowing might not be a problem for you, but leads to
the question why do you need to crossover at 400Hz? What are you using in the
next frequency band down? Before you commit to the design I would look at your
system as a whole. Your horn (apart from the curved mouth) looks to have almost
flat sides. Even if you finally intend to go with the layered construction do a
few mock-ups with sheet sides first and take some measurements. You can use
polystyrene bocks to experiment with the curved mouth termination. |
||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Cheers guys, Ive made some basic 60x40 horns with the same depth and ran them with 400Hz high pass and they sound very clean to me, distortion increases with power but the integrity of the dynamics holds together very well, better than anything else ive heard i think. They can be a bit aggressive but thats mainly the really fast dynamics, your getting more information than with other systems. Ive taken them as loud as i could stand but i haven't given them full power yet, i haven't needed too. I think there may be excursion issues with a 400Hz highpass and full power so i may have to limit them but i doubt this will be an issue there plenty loud enough.
Thanks Steve, Yep 22 sheets of 18mm, though when i glue them together it will probably end up slightly deeper, yeah i meant the axial path length is equivalent to 215Hz. The round over terminates to a flat baffle, It dos not fold back on it self it just looks a bit like it does on that picture, its going into a box anyway so much more practical to end on a flat baffle, and i haven't got the space for a full roundover. Where the flare intersects with the round over i made it correct for the horizontal axis, so its not quite smooth in the vertical axis, i couldn't think of a better way to do it, its not miles off i may just sand it smooth, any ideas? Yeah i new a wide mouth woul cause lobeing, its a problem with wide bandwidth horns, it dos not seem too bad with the horns ive done, i might do some off axis measurements later on, as its a nice day outside, the round over version should help a bit with this i think. Below these i am running a 2x12" horn , currently lowpass at 370Hz and high pass at 400Hz to the BMS, its sounds very good, nice and clear, it can seem a little thin but i think that because im used to cone drivers in the mids. 370Hz lowpass is about the limit of the 2x12" horns, above this i get a resonance creeping in. Cheers for the tip Steve i didnt think about using polystyrene to make a quick round over, ive done the twisted towel thing and it made a difference, not as much as when i tried it on a small conical 2KHz horn though. I know Tannoy use these BMS drivers with a 450Hz high pass, and i think one of there horns says 400Hz on it, im quite happy running them down this low. Cheers for the input guys. James |
||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Current 60x40 horn and low mid RB212 cab, the mid high horns fits inside the low mid horn for storage and transportation. |
||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The above horn, blue is unprocessed, green is with EQ. |
||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
MarjanM
Old Croc Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7816 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That is a huge horn. How come it does not go lower?
|
||
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not too sure, i was expecting it to go a bit lower, i cant remember where i set the highpass when i took those measurements but i assume it was well below the cutoff, its quite a fast expansion being 60x40 so that could explain some of it.
|
||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
Steve_B
Old Croc Joined: 29 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
I thought that you designed loudspeakers professionally?
Surely you know a little acoustic theory. The response characteristics of a
horn are not simply a function of its size. If I remember correctly, the acoustic impedance of a conical
horn is as shown below in the sketch. It has two components resistive and reactive. Unlike
exponential and hyperbolic horns there is no distinct cutoff. The resistance
rises slowly until it reaches an asymptotic value, indicated by the arrow in
the image. The frequency of this point depends on the solid angle that the horn
makes. To lower the frequency the angle needs to be smaller. As the angle is
usually set by coverage pattern required the lower roll off frequency is set
and making the horn larger won’t improve the response. |
||
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |