Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Plans > New Projects Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - affect of passive cross-overs on Re
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

affect of passive cross-overs on Re

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: affect of passive cross-overs on Re
    Posted: 13 October 2004 at 4:25pm

now then........

....i've been sitting at work all afternoon pondering my new mid/top end set up and how its going to come together......

......i've got some of the components already and kinda know what other bits i want.....its at the planning stage at the mo coz its taking all my spare time to make the remaining high-pressure hornz, but a little advice on a couple of things would be appreciated.....

...right... in total its going to consist of.....

 

2x P.Audio BMD450 1" exit compression drivers 1.75" voice coil 80w (r.m.s. i assume) 108dB spl..... mounted on P.audio PH220 90x70 dispersion horn

4x phl audio 1130, 130W aes,   16ohm,  300-5k htz,  sens=96dB spl max 113dB 1.5" voice coil

these two will make up the top end, with 1 comp driver and 2 phl drivers per side, crossed over active 500htz-20K(?), then 2 way passive with eminence px2-3k5 xover (lp 12dB/oct, hp 18dB oct, 8ohm 400w) crossing to the comp drivers at 3.5K  

2x phl in parrallel require 250W at 8ohm......1x p.audio requires max power of 150W at 8?ohm(?bit of a guess?)......without the xover the combined power of all drivers required would be 400W at 4ohm (correct?).......the x over is stated as being 8ohm.....what effect on the total resistance and therefore the total power required does the cross over make? ...there is a gain +/-9dB to the trebble on the passive cross over so if this was set to  -3dB there would be half as much power going to the one comp driver as there would be to the 2 phl drivers...correct? this would power them all to the correct levels...... 

.............am i talking sh*t here?

i will use 2x 15" fane classic 200W 44Htz-4KHtz for lower mid around 120Htz to 500Htz and these will come directly from the actice x-over....

...how does that sound to people?......i have to leave work now but will be back on tomorrow....

....any advice appreciated as ever.....

cheers    

 

peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
Timber_MG View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2004
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 1454
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timber_MG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 October 2004 at 6:41pm
Heya

I thought you had the 300W model. The 200W is supposedly (according to thielesmall.com) 3 dB more efficient, so probably the better choice for your application.

Compression drivers always have to be padded down to get to the same level as direct-radiating drivers. The sensitivity of your drivers around crossover wil be determined by the baffle dimentions and placement amongst other things.

IIRC the PHLs have a fairly low inductance and extremely benign roll-off (these are made for studio monitoring), so crossing them shouldn't be too much of an issue. You have to put them in a seperate chamber from the mid-bass though (this is not an option). Tweeter horns are much more finickey to how you cross them though, as the impedance can show multiple peaks close to the range you're intending to cross over.

My thinking was to pair the mids up to a small 60x90 degree horn (the little B&C came to mind) in an MTM or MMT configuration.

The problem with a passive crossovers will likely be that if you go for a Constant Directivity horn you'll have to eq for the roll-off above 3.5kHz, which can happen either at the crossover or the equalizer. Thus is it generally a good idea to have a crossover that matches the characteristics of the driver combination used and usually this end up differing from the pre-mader solutions from Eminence et al for an optimal result. It is often said that the crossover is the heard of a speaker.

Martin
Back to Top
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 9:21am

cheers martin  .......i remember you saying that it would be optimal to build my own cross-over unit........i'm not sure that i'd be able to make one without messing it up........how complex would it be to build a cross over specific to my needs? and how does it compare to the purchased ones in terms of factors such as cost and time? (which i never seem to have enough of at the moment!) ...is there a cross over unit available that would be better suited to the application?

i'll have a quick look at the b+c horns.....and be back

many thanks 

peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 9:54am

right i got the guys at proaudio parts to get back to me about thier 60x90 horns for 6.5" drivers.......would pairing them involve sticking the two drivers close together with the horn throat somewhere between them? ........ are you recomending that i should put the comp. driver in the same box as the 2 phl's? ...you mention that the baffle puts constraints on the response at the crossover frequencies...what kind of cab shape and baffle should i be thinking of for these wee bad boys?  ...is there anything anyone's come accross on thier web travels that i could read to help with this cab design....i like your idea of angling the tops down a little to 'fly' them without actually making them fly..

...oh yeh....it is the 200w version of the fane 15" that i have

.......also.......what affect does the 8ohm resistance of the cross over have on the totall resistance of the speakers in parrallel? and therefore the power that i need to apply to them?

many thanks

peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 10:30am

.....now then......just been speaking to proaudio parts, they couldn't think of a horn that i could use the 6.5" drivers on so i think i'm going to go for a normal direct radiating design for the 6.5's and horn load the p.audio tweeters......i want to stick 2x 6.5" and 1x 1" compression in a single cab........normally they will be used 2 cabs next to each other on top of a single stack.......

would it be better to go for......   T    or..&nbs p;  M      or....&nb sp;   T      &n bsp;   

                                                 M      ;       T           ;    M   M

                                                 M      ;        M

....( T= 1" copmpression , M= 6.5" phl audio).....to keep interference to a minimum?

many thanks as ever

peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
Timber_MG View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2004
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 1454
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timber_MG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 10:40am

1 ) TMM: If crossover designed correctly, it can offer better power response in the cross-over region compared to MTT in one plane (going down), whereas

2) MTM : The vertical polar response is a "mirror image" and has the advantage of adding a little vetical directivity

3) Only for use with low crossover frequencies, as otherwise you'll have horizontal lobing.

Martin

Back to Top
Timber_MG View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2004
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 1454
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timber_MG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 10:43am

Limmer do a 6,5"/1" midrange flare and IIRC there was a 6,5" mid in the works at PAP. Enquire about Limmer at www.lsv-achenbach.de . Limmer aren't cheap though.

Regards

Martin

Back to Top
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 10:51am

...just realised my attempt ot allign the M's and the T's failed miserably.....

 3.5K isn't really that low so it would cause lobing? hence..dont use the 6.5" drivers horizontally next to each other? (correct?) .....

i think its looking like i'll go for TMM (vertically top to bottom)...then stack two cabs next to each other.... this would mean that the positon of the 4x 6.5" phl's would form 'a square'.......ok/not ok?

if i made the cabs trapezoidal then when i stack them together they would be angled slightly away from each other giving wider dispersion and slightly less interference?

many thanks

peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
Timber_MG View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2004
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 1454
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timber_MG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 10:56am

You are catching on. if you have a horn with 60 degree horizontal dispersion (turning a 90x60 horn around) you'll end up with a trap cab with around 15degrees for a side angle. Whether it's sensible to keep the Mid-high section as close as possible to one another...I'm not sure. This would mean that you'd end up with a left and a right speaker.

With a little effort, a measurement mic, pre-amp, jig and speaker workshop, you can design your own crossovers, but crossover design is a bit of an art. One needs to be especially careful of the response characteristics off-axis if you intend on being able to stack these properly.

Martin

Back to Top
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 10:57am

money is unfortunatley a real issue at the moment......

would the phl's on a horn totally out strip the DR 15" low mids?

.....it's tempting due to financial constraints to load the phl's normal direct radiating styleeee...just having the compressions on a horn

any thoughts?

would total resistance of 2x phl in parrallel (16ohm each) and 1x p.audio tweeter (8ohms) through a 8ohm crossover still be 8ohms?

cheers

peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
Timber_MG View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2004
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 1454
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timber_MG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 1:26pm

Basically, assuming a well designed crossover.

Due to cost I would also recommend a DR setup for now. You can play around with a horn setup at a later stage. A well designed crossover is a big boon though. In Germany you get people like Sound Klinik that design crossovers for people like yourself, but methinks you're looking at 200Euros for the design.

Do a search (perhaps on diyaudio.com) on the Edge tool. Shows you the effect of baffle diffraction on frequency response.

Regards

Martin

Back to Top
dubsuction View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dubsuction Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 October 2004 at 1:51pm
cheers man
peace+respect-always
**HIGH PRESSURE SOUND SYSTEM**
www.highpressuresound.co.uk
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.