Altered Mt122 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
SAMIAM
Registered User Joined: 01 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 01 December 2005 at 4:42pm |
If I build Mt122 rectangular and not trapezoidal and so doing increase
the chamber volume but not the horn will this impact on the performance
of the horn
|
|
Andrew
Registered User Joined: 10 March 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 669 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've not built the 122 yet, only the 102, and in that case, a small rear chamber is best, Rog recommends an even narrower gap (hence rear chamber volume) than in the drawing, in the FAQ.
|
|
SAMIAM
Registered User Joined: 01 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I had intended to build single MT122 like Doms; his dont appear to be
trapezoidal maybe the solution is the original rear chamber (as in the plans) within a rectangular cab |
|
Dom
Old Croc Joined: 25 February 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1700 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Mine have a rear chamber as per the plans.
|
|
"It sounded like a million fire engines chasing ten million ambulances through a war zone and it was played at a volume that made the empty chair beside me bleed."
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |