Anyone else using a 'virtual' mixing desk? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
loudnclear
Registered User Joined: 13 August 2008 Location: Glasgow Status: Offline Points: 353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 29 July 2010 at 4:17pm |
just wonderingf....
I'm using Software Audio Console for the last 9 months with great success. I can use it with either a traditional multicore or run it via remote laptop using CAT5 or wifi.... www.softwareaudioconsole.com |
|
soundguymatt
Young Croc Joined: 25 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 688 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
i know i have a console to do something like this with my motu but yeah wouldn't mind getting that software.
|
|
loudnclear
Registered User Joined: 13 August 2008 Location: Glasgow Status: Offline Points: 353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The built in mixer software with most soundcards / interfaces isn't anywhere near as advanced as SAC. Gates and comps on every channel, paramatric EQ, 24 separate monitor mixers, etc....
|
|
Saul
Old Croc Joined: 15 June 2007 Status: Offline Points: 5912 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
what interface are you using? i assume you'd need a few to do lots of channels. motu 828 has 10 ins
i also don't know if i could rely on a computer to keep a gig going. as good as they can be, it would just worry me. mind you, i suppose an LS9 is effectively this. Edited by Saul - 31 July 2010 at 12:17pm |
|
loudnclear
Registered User Joined: 13 August 2008 Location: Glasgow Status: Offline Points: 353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
All digital mixing desks are essentially computers just running proprietary software, wheras SAC runs on a standard PC running windoze (XP / Win 7). My main rig is based around an old IBM Pentium 4 small form factor desktop with and RME HDSP9652 soundcard linked to 3 Behringer ADA8000 preamps, giving me 24 analog ins plus I use the S/PDIF connections looped back to each other for internal winamp use for break music etc.... so 26 ins / 24 outs in this configuration. You can use whatever (ADAT based) pre's you want.... I'm considering upgrading to Focusrite, but TBH, for live use, I can't fault the Berry's (there are even some massive Las Vegas Casinos running SAC systems and using the Berry pre's!)..... I reckon that I've got easily 60 live gigs under my belt with this rig so far, although I was as sceptical as anyone in the beginning as to reliability, so left it on 'soak test' for a week running 24 channels. I also have a laptop based system I've been playing around with, as I had a Phonic Firefly interface kicking around from a recording project. I eventually got this set up working but I'm not keen on the fragility of the firewire connection, which,if it gets disturbed, windows loses sync with the interface. Others are using laptops with RME interfaces with great results and the M Audio Profire 2626 seems to be working well too.... I think the main benefits are price. I was gonna buy a LS9-32 before I found out about this, which was s/hand about £5.5K at the time.... I built my SAC system for about a grand and the wholething rolls in a 10U ABS rack that has the monitor built into the back cover and takes about 2 minutes to rig. Also, the ability to use a 2nd PC as a remote (no audio passing through it at all) is fantastic. I mixed last night's gig from a netbook via wifi into the main system...... Folk have a hard time getting their heads around the fact that I'm mixing the band and not just checking my emails! The other (major) benefit is sound quality. It is sooooo clean, really doesn't sound digital at all, strangely..... Okay, I'm starting to sound like some kind of evangelist here.... just that I don't think that many in the UK are aware of it yet.... |
|
soundguymatt
Young Croc Joined: 25 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 688 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
so is the software free?
|
|
silworm
Registered User Joined: 28 September 2004 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 271 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What's the difference between these and using the mixer from Cubase or any other DAW?
|
|
loudnclear
Registered User Joined: 13 August 2008 Location: Glasgow Status: Offline Points: 353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No, $500 US |
|
loudnclear
Registered User Joined: 13 August 2008 Location: Glasgow Status: Offline Points: 353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For live use, mainly the fact that cubase, reaper, etc are designed for recording use. SAC is laid out like a digital mixer for live use would be. plus 24 monitor consoles..... gates, comps, low latency suing a decent soundcard, the ability to use the remote software on a laptop via wifi...... |
|
podman999
Young Croc Joined: 08 October 2007 Location: Dumfries Status: Offline Points: 508 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Loud and clear, are you Steven that was with 3 card trick last week at the showcase?
I'm Lee from teh Copycats, we had a good chat! Have to say I was well impressed with the quality of your system! Iwould make the move myself but I think as a performer/operator It could be fiddly for on the fly editing. Great for use with someone on front of house though! Loved the seperate monitor mixer too!! Lee. |
|
loudnclear
Registered User Joined: 13 August 2008 Location: Glasgow Status: Offline Points: 353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Lee...
yeah, guilty your honour.... Was good to chat with you, sorry I didn't get a bit more time at the end of the night but you know how it is at those things - everyone's desperate to get away and the lads had another gig that night... Like I mentioned to you, when I was playing with my old band and running sound, the biggest problem was always not having a hand free to make any changes. That said, with a small control surface hooked up, you could arrange your main 8 'money' channels together to at least get easy access to faders and mutes. without needing to use the mouse. A press of one F key will jump you to whatever monitor mixer you need on the same fader layout, so the control surface faders will chase..... I did buy an 8 fader Behringer surface, but TBH have gotten so used to mixing with the mouse now that I don't bother taking it out. You can link up multiple 8 fader surfaces together......... Also, not sure if it would be of interest to you guys - but if you ever wanted to use backing tracks, the developer also wrote the SAW Studio DAW program and it hooks straight into SAC without using up any line inputs or preamps, it just patches together virtually. you can also do multitrack recording straight off the inputs from SAC to SAW Studio in the same way. Personally I couldn't justify the cost of the studio package but I am able to track in a similar way using Reaper but I need to individually assign the inputs and name them, whereas SAW Studio does that all automatically. Anyway, it's probably not for everyone, but it has been the best money I have spent in my audio career so far..... |
|
Steve_B
Old Croc Joined: 29 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I’ve not used SAC, but I’ve done a number of gigs controlling
an 01V remotely using wifi. I use an old wireless router and a Belkin network
to USB hub. The last gig I did was using Studio Manager running on XP,
which in turn was a guest OS under Virtualbox on Ubuntu. PC was a Toshiba NB100
netbook. The main problem was lack of screen area. |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |