![]() |
Can martin 215 mk3 or f2b keep up with es18 or usb |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 1314151617 23> |
| Author | ||
norty303
Old Croc
Joined: 18 August 2004 Location: Eastbourne Status: Offline Points: 8800 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 5:11pm |
|
|
Isn't the quite well respected Martin WSX horn slot loaded too?
Or is the fact it's folded and therefore bandwidth limited in its favour in keeping the nastiness out of the sound? |
||
|
My laser stuff: Frikkin Lasers
|
||
![]() |
||
SMP
Young Croc
Joined: 16 March 2013 Location: East London Status: Offline Points: 1209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 5:45pm |
|
|
it is indeed pressure Slot loaded often referred to as "Letterbox" & Folded too I do not like either. I do not like Compression loading and strive to keep it to a minimum in all things including Mids & HF and do not use High Compression devices for either.
we intend to try the BMS mids which apparently have a Comp ratio of 8:1 which is a lot higher than I was expecting. in saying this I cannot be sure how true this is as the same figure was given for all their devices which I find odd that there are no differences across differing models we have tried a BMS VHF device that seems to work well in initial trials I was hoping the mids would be around 2:1 an increase to 8:1 is not very welcome as we are currently using devices at 1.8:1 So Compression is not such a good thing a little is ok but lots is not and the lower the bandwidth the worse it is Phil Newall did a whole series of articles and a paper on it in the 90's. We had a long discussion as to its flaws and shortcomings then. I have always avoided it where I can |
||
![]() |
||
tv00
Old Croc
Joined: 10 August 2009 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 1886 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 6:21pm |
|
|
I think compression is worst on mid high definately
The bms drivers have different compression ratios, I use 4538 / 4540nd and like them very much, they're tiny & not that powerfull talking watts, but the sensivity is high! The compression is pretty low for a 1" driver, the diaphragm is 1,5" (38mm) 1:2,25 I found that I liked this by ear, later comparisons showed me that they have a lot less compression above 4 khz than other drivers. I use mine only above 4 khz, hitting full power above 5khz. But still has nothing to do with the kick compression, I like martin audio 215, I also like the xtro kick, which is straight, but won't go as low, guess it has less compression too. So anyone up for designing a kick? Perhaps the compression is a part of what makes them so popular Edited by tv00 - 20 November 2014 at 6:34pm |
||
|
www.facebook.com/babysoundsystem
|
||
![]() |
||
SMP
Young Croc
Joined: 16 March 2013 Location: East London Status: Offline Points: 1209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 6:54pm |
|
|
we are using 4538 too. We asked BMS for the figures and 8:1 was the response. Perhaps this is not the real answer I will endeavour to get another response. as according to what you have posted someone was just giving out incorrect data. I did not enquire myself but a Colleague so I had best ask again.
We use them at a minimum of 3.5KHz. Find them very good and as you say they are fairly efficient. use annular loading though quite different diaphragm to our usual load which is horrendously expensive at £750 per driver which is also a "Plastic" Diaphragm. This is a good material as opposed to Metallic types having high internal losses reducing resonance and colouration. |
||
![]() |
||
tv00
Old Croc
Joined: 10 August 2009 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 1886 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 7:05pm |
|
|
Why ask them? It's so easy to calculate, unless theres something in the front chamber / phaseplug in the driver that I'm no aware of.
The diaphragm is 1,5" The throat is 1" the area of a circle is pi x radius^2 So I would say the compression must be: pi x 0,75^2 / pi x 0,5^2 You're starting to make sense to me, I work with low distortion in high/mid and play adjust it to play loud with no earplugs & no tinnitus. The bms 4538 have a polyester diaphragm, are you saying that you use a different one? I wish they would sell 4538 16 ohm! Nevertheless we should stick within the topic: kickcompression Edited by tv00 - 20 November 2014 at 7:06pm |
||
|
www.facebook.com/babysoundsystem
|
||
![]() |
||
Timebomb
Old Croc
Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2763 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 8:25pm |
|
|
The diaphragm may be 1.5" diameter but its an annular diaphragm, not a flat disk, the throat is not 1" also, the driver exit is 1" diameter. The real throat is the gap right in front of the diaphragm, that is where highest compression exists. The BMS hf drivers get away with higher compression as they are annular diaphragms, not domes, so distortion from model breakup is pushed out of band and the diaphragm is better dampened as it is much smaller.
|
||
|
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
||
![]() |
||
madboffin
Old Croc
Joined: 03 July 2009 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Offline Points: 1720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:05pm |
|
This job was in 1990, things were done differently in them days! There were chain hoists to get the speakers onto the platforms, boxes were hoisted in pairs. Then stacked and positioned by the array designer (me) and 4 local crew (with 2 more landing the boxes and feeding them to the stackers). Obviously you can do the ground stacks and the opposite side concurrently, if you have the people and an accurate system plan. The staging was built from May 28th to 30th. Lights loaded in on the 31st. Sound crew were called for 1400 on May 31st to load in and start rigging the main stacks. The next day was a full sound fitup / rigging day to finish the PA build and test the system. June 2nd was soundcheck day, final rig tuning then bands and a camera rehearsal. Show day was June 3rd. There was stuff going on all day but the bands performed from 1945 to 2330. Towards the end of the evening there were, according to press reports, about a quarter of a million people in the audience. The next day was allocated for technical strike and loadout, I can't remember when it finished but typically these things derig a lot quicker than you might expect. Probably around mid-day. Show timings had to be spot on as it was going out live on Channel 4 TV. There was a panic when the Stage Manager called the start of the show on his GP300. He was standing next to the stage power distro, and that's when we found the RCD's could be tripped by RF... This being 1990, of course some of the bands had loads of keyboard kit that had to be reset and re-loaded from disk after the power was restored. Meanwhile, I'm sure the people in the TV scanner were having a lovely time... Here's a set of pictures taken from the top deck. These were taken during the early evening before the field really filled up with people. You can see the SL Lx tower, with a bit of the SL audio delay tower just visible behind it, FOH, the SR audio delay and the SR Lx tower. FOH ws about 50m from stage, and the field delays 100m. http://www.spamabyss.net/pictures/BDcrowd2.jpg Edited by madboffin - 20 November 2014 at 10:48pm |
||
![]() |
||
SMP
Young Croc
Joined: 16 March 2013 Location: East London Status: Offline Points: 1209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:18pm |
|
|
Really NOW I begin to make sense to you?
I have been saying that I have been working in the low pressure domain for over 20yrs!!! And you are quite right Timebomb it is Annular. Furthermore if I ask a Product Manufacturer for a specification, I expect to get it. Not be told just the first figure that someone plucks from the ether. there is little difference in Acoustic compression & Electrical Signal Compression. although at high levels the Acoustic distorts the Waveform much differently from the original signal. IIRC The study back in the 90's which was a research mostly into Studio reference monitoring showed that as the fast moving Diaphragm acted under Compression & Decompression states they was a certain amount of distortion created as waveform "Overhang" as a Non-Linearity or to put it another way the output from the pressure Phase loading series of Annular rings did not track the movement of said Diaphragm there may be still on record the study the Author was Philip Newall I used to look after some of his Amplifiers by way of servicing them so we got talking. Not too many have given this subject any great attention but I do know and have discussed it with the few that have. It is a little like "Pattern Control Wave-guides" which are best suited to use of low pressure domain drivers as the Horn theory is quite turned on it's head. OOPS what do I know eh??? I am a fantasist ( Sorry not a word) a Troll, & oh so many other things yet I am expected to "Share" I do not think so Like most people I do not respond well to insults of any kind Just to add this applies to any system any bandwidth so in keeping with the thread it applies to pressure loaded bass horns as well Edited by SMP - 20 November 2014 at 10:24pm |
||
![]() |
||
SMP
Young Croc
Joined: 16 March 2013 Location: East London Status: Offline Points: 1209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:31pm |
|
|
Whilst we are discussing Horns here May i ask a Question relating to Hornresp which I have no need of so have never used.
does it take into account any objects placed within the Horn? |
||
![]() |
||
toastyghost
The 10,000 Points Club
Joined: 09 January 2007 Location: Manchester Status: Offline Points: 10932 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:57pm |
|
And to think in another thread that people thought that Danley Jericho systems were too big to handle even for big events. Wonder how long this lot would have taken to rig, how many people were needed and what the whole thing weighs. Oh, and how many cranes and/or fork lifts were used? Bet it was loud, though! [/QUOTE] ![]() Martin posted this on Facebook earlier… |
||
![]() |
||
Jimmer
Old Croc
Joined: 30 April 2010 Location: Stroud / Glos Status: Offline Points: 2604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 11:04pm |
|
|
Just formidable
that's gotta be my fave photo of the F2 Kyle
|
||
![]() |
||
Jimmer
Old Croc
Joined: 30 April 2010 Location: Stroud / Glos Status: Offline Points: 2604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 November 2014 at 11:06pm |
|
|
What amps would that have been powered with back in the day?
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 1314151617 23> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |