Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > General Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Can martin 215 mk3 or f2b keep up with es18 or usb
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Can martin 215 mk3 or f2b keep up with es18 or usb

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1314151617 23>
Author
Message
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
norty303 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: Eastbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 8800
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote norty303 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 5:11pm
Isn't the quite well respected Martin WSX horn slot loaded too?

Or is the fact it's folded and therefore bandwidth limited in its favour in keeping the nastiness out of the sound?
My laser stuff: Frikkin Lasers
Back to Top
SMP View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2013
Location: East London
Status: Offline
Points: 1209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SMP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 5:45pm
it is indeed pressure Slot loaded often referred to as "Letterbox" & Folded too I do not like either. I do not like Compression loading and strive to keep it to a minimum in all things including Mids & HF and do not use High Compression devices for either.
we intend to try the BMS mids which apparently have a Comp ratio of 8:1 which is a lot higher than I was expecting. in saying this I cannot be sure how true this is as the same figure was given for all their devices which I find odd that there are no differences across differing models
we have tried a BMS VHF device that seems to work well in initial trials
I was hoping the mids would be around 2:1 an increase to 8:1 is not very welcome as we are currently using devices at 1.8:1
So Compression is not such a good thing a little is ok but lots is not and the lower the bandwidth the worse it is

Phil Newall did a whole series of articles and a paper on it in the 90's. We had a long discussion as to its flaws and shortcomings then. I have always avoided it where I can
Back to Top
tv00 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 10 August 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 1886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tv00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 6:21pm
I think compression is worst on mid high definately

The bms drivers have different compression ratios, I use 4538 / 4540nd and like them very much, they're tiny & not that powerfull talking watts, but the sensivity is high!
The compression is pretty low for a 1" driver, the diaphragm is 1,5" (38mm) 1:2,25
I found that I liked this by ear, later comparisons showed me that they have a lot less compression above 4 khz than other drivers.
I use mine only above 4 khz, hitting full power above 5khz.

But still has nothing to do with the kick compression, I like martin audio 215, I also like the xtro kick, which is straight, but won't go as low, guess it has less compression too.

So anyone up for designing a kick?
Perhaps the compression is a part of what makes them so popular


Edited by tv00 - 20 November 2014 at 6:34pm
www.facebook.com/babysoundsystem
Back to Top
SMP View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2013
Location: East London
Status: Offline
Points: 1209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SMP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 6:54pm
we are using 4538 too. We asked BMS for the figures and 8:1 was the response. Perhaps this is not the real answer I will endeavour to get another response. as according to what you have posted someone was just giving out incorrect data. I did not enquire myself but a Colleague so I had best ask again.

We use them at a minimum of 3.5KHz. Find them very good and as you say they are fairly efficient. use annular loading though quite different diaphragm to our usual load which is horrendously expensive at £750 per driver which is also a "Plastic" Diaphragm. This is a good material as opposed to Metallic types having high internal losses reducing resonance and colouration.
Back to Top
tv00 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 10 August 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 1886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tv00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 7:05pm
Why ask them? It's so easy to calculate, unless theres something in the front chamber / phaseplug in the driver that I'm no aware of.
The diaphragm is 1,5"
The throat is 1"
the area of a circle is pi x radius^2
So I would say the compression must be:
pi x 0,75^2 / pi x 0,5^2

You're starting to make sense to me, I work with low distortion in high/mid and play adjust it to play loud with no earplugs & no tinnitus.
The bms 4538 have a polyester diaphragm, are you saying that you use a different one? I wish they would sell 4538 16 ohm!

Nevertheless we should stick within the topic: kickcompression


Edited by tv00 - 20 November 2014 at 7:06pm
www.facebook.com/babysoundsystem
Back to Top
Timebomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2004
Location: Lancaster
Status: Offline
Points: 2763
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timebomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 8:25pm
The diaphragm may be 1.5" diameter but its an annular diaphragm, not a flat disk, the throat is not 1" also,  the driver exit is 1" diameter.  The real throat is the gap right in front of the diaphragm, that is where highest compression exists.  The BMS hf drivers get away with higher compression as they are annular diaphragms, not domes,  so distortion from model breakup is pushed out of band and the diaphragm is better dampened as it is much smaller.
James Secker          facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk               www.soundgear.co.uk
Back to Top
madboffin View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 03 July 2009
Location: Milton Keynes
Status: Offline
Points: 1720
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote madboffin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:05pm
Originally posted by jazomir jazomir wrote:

And to think in another thread that people thought that Danley Jericho systems were too big to handle even for big events. Wonder how long this lot would have taken to rig, how many people were needed and what the whole thing weighs. Oh, and how many cranes and/or fork lifts were used? Bet it was loud, though!


This job was in 1990, things were done differently in them days!

There were chain hoists to get the speakers onto the platforms, boxes were hoisted in pairs. Then stacked and positioned by the array designer (me) and 4 local crew (with 2 more landing the boxes and feeding them to the stackers). Obviously you can do the ground stacks and the opposite side concurrently, if you have the people and an accurate system plan.

The staging was built from May 28th to 30th. Lights loaded in on the 31st.
Sound crew were called for 1400 on May 31st to load in and start rigging the main stacks. The next day was a full sound fitup / rigging day to finish the PA build and test the system.
June 2nd was soundcheck day, final rig tuning then bands and a camera rehearsal.
Show day was June 3rd. There was stuff going on all day but the bands performed from 1945 to 2330. Towards the end of the evening there were, according to press reports, about a quarter of a million people in the audience.
The next day was allocated for technical strike and loadout, I can't remember when it finished but typically these things derig a lot quicker than you might expect. Probably around mid-day.

Show timings had to be spot on as it was going out live on Channel 4 TV. There was a panic when the Stage Manager called the start of the show on his GP300. He was standing next to the stage power distro, and that's when we found the RCD's could be tripped by RF...
This being 1990, of course some of the bands had loads of keyboard kit that had to be reset and re-loaded from disk after the power was restored. Meanwhile, I'm sure the people in the TV scanner were having a lovely time...

Here's a set of pictures taken from the top deck. These were taken during the early evening before the field really filled up with people. You can see the SL Lx tower, with a bit of the SL audio delay tower just visible behind it, FOH, the SR audio delay and the SR Lx tower. FOH ws about 50m from stage, and the field delays 100m.
http://www.spamabyss.net/pictures/BDcrowd2.jpg




Edited by madboffin - 20 November 2014 at 10:48pm
Back to Top
SMP View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2013
Location: East London
Status: Offline
Points: 1209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SMP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:18pm
Really NOW I begin to make sense to you?
I have been saying that I have been working in the low pressure domain for over 20yrs!!! And you are quite right Timebomb it is Annular. Furthermore if I ask a Product Manufacturer for a specification, I expect to get it. Not be told just the first figure that someone plucks from the ether.

there is little difference in Acoustic compression & Electrical Signal Compression. although at high levels the Acoustic distorts the Waveform much differently from the original signal. IIRC The study back in the 90's which was a research mostly into Studio reference monitoring showed that as the fast moving Diaphragm acted under Compression & Decompression states they was a certain amount of distortion created as waveform "Overhang" as a Non-Linearity or to put it another way the output from the pressure Phase loading series of Annular rings did not track the movement of said Diaphragm

there may be still on record the study the Author was Philip Newall I used to look after some of his Amplifiers by way of servicing them so we got talking.

Not too many have given this subject any great attention but I do know and have discussed it with the few that have. It is a little like "Pattern Control Wave-guides"  which are best suited to use of low pressure domain drivers as the Horn theory is quite turned on it's head.

OOPS what do I know eh??? I am a fantasist ( Sorry not a word) a Troll,  & oh so many other things yet I am expected to "Share"  I do not think so Like most people I do not respond well to insults of any kind

Just to add this applies to any system any bandwidth so in keeping with the thread it applies to pressure loaded bass horns as well


Edited by SMP - 20 November 2014 at 10:24pm
Back to Top
SMP View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2013
Location: East London
Status: Offline
Points: 1209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SMP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:31pm
Whilst we are discussing Horns here May i ask a Question relating to Hornresp which I have no need of so have never used.

does it take into account any objects placed within the Horn?
Back to Top
toastyghost View Drop Down
The 10,000 Points Club
The 10,000 Points Club
Avatar

Joined: 09 January 2007
Location: Manchester
Status: Offline
Points: 10932
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote toastyghost Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 10:57pm
Originally posted by jazomir jazomir wrote:

Originally posted by Pin2Hot Pin2Hot wrote:


Madboffin,
Thanks for the pictures, is that Dave strolling up for a listen?

http://www.dghwells.clara.net/pictures/BDstack.jpg


And to think in another thread that people thought that Danley Jericho systems were too big to handle even for big events. Wonder how long this lot would have taken to rig, how many people were needed and what the whole thing weighs. Oh, and how many cranes and/or fork lifts were used? Bet it was loud, though!
[/QUOTE]



Martin posted this on Facebook earlier…
Back to Top
Jimmer View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 30 April 2010
Location: Stroud / Glos
Status: Offline
Points: 2604
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jimmer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 11:04pm
Just formidable that's gotta be my fave photo of the F2 Kyle
Back to Top
Jimmer View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 30 April 2010
Location: Stroud / Glos
Status: Offline
Points: 2604
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jimmer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2014 at 11:06pm
What amps would that have been powered with back in the day?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1314151617 23>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.