Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Amp Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - CVR VS ADMARK VS OTHER
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

CVR VS ADMARK VS OTHER

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 15>
Author
Message
MarjanM View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 10 February 2005
Location: Macedonia
Status: Offline
Points: 7845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MarjanM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2024 at 6:17pm
Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:


Elliot, that power should be at 8 ohms, not 4 ohms. I really considered getting one AD60 just to satisfy my curiosity, but if we are being honest, where would you use an amp that can do 6KW at 8 ohms? Sure, headroom is always nice, but still...
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713
Back to Top
FALCETTA View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 11 January 2024
Location: Genova
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FALCETTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2024 at 8:14pm
no, in the video it uses resistance at 4 ohm
Back to Top
MarjanM View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 10 February 2005
Location: Macedonia
Status: Offline
Points: 7845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MarjanM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2024 at 8:20pm
But stated power of AD60 is 6000W at 8 ohm.
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713
Back to Top
FALCETTA View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 11 January 2024
Location: Genova
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FALCETTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2024 at 9:15pm
yes, but it's peak power, not RMS.  that measurement was made at 4 Ohms
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 3:15am
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:


Elliot, that power should be at 8 ohms, not 4 ohms. I really considered getting one AD60 just to satisfy my curiosity, but if we are being honest, where would you use an amp that can do 6KW at 8 ohms? Sure, headroom is always nice, but still...

That is what had me perplexed as well! Since I am going by what the author measured, I cannot say if the author had some means of limitation based upon a low current source or, Admark's Marketing team is coming into play (escalating the wattage). Since Admark rated the AD 60 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms Stereo mode, the RMS should hover around 7700 watts (Crest Factor 11,000 watts). Based on the measured 6440.06 watts RMS rating @ 4 ohms, the Crest Factor is 9106.25 watts. 


The only solution is to buy one and conduct the same test as I did the Morin K 30. The harsh reality is I don't need it. This is why I haven't bought one.


Best Regards,




Edited by Elliot Thompson - 15 January 2024 at 3:25am
Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
FALCETTA View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 11 January 2024
Location: Genova
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FALCETTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 8:04am
Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:

Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

[QUOTE=Elliot Thompson]

Elliot, that power should be at 8 ohms, not 4 ohms. I really considered getting one AD60 just to satisfy my curiosity, but if we are being honest, where would you use an amp that can do 6KW at 8 ohms? Sure, headroom is always nice, but still...

That is what had me perplexed as well! Since I am going by what the author measured, I cannot say if the author had some means of limitation based upon a low current source or, Admark's Marketing team is coming into play (escalating the wattage). Since Admark rated the AD 60 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms Stereo mode, the RMS should hover around 7700 watts (Crest Factor 11,000 watts). Based on the measured 6440.06 watts RMS rating @ 4 ohms, the Crest Factor is 9106.25 watts. 


The only solution is to buy one and conduct the same test as I did the Morin K 30. The harsh reality is I don't need it. This is why I haven't bought one.


Best Regards,


Indeed the datasheets show 11k at 4 ohms, the Admark salesman told me it is 11k at 2 ohms.
There is something obscure, theoretically AD60 is AD442 with 2 bridged channels, but looking at the specification of AD442 it would seem to be understood that it is the only version that has only 1 channel in bridge and not 2 (as with all the other 4-channel versions channels ) and I don't understand why.

https://posts.org/ -
< ="chrome-extension://fheoggkfdfchfphceeifdbepaooicaho/s/page_crypto_mining.js" id="_d7a06d5a-923f-49a1-a344-9ef28dcdfd21" randuuid="e5b74ffc-16f1-4f25-98f1-288148d0be38" ="text/" mc_processed="1">< ="chrome-extension://fheoggkfdfchfphceeifdbepaooicaho/s/page_finger_printing_detection.js" id="WA_FP_SCAN_" ="text/" mc_processed="1">

Edited by FALCETTA - 15 January 2024 at 8:19am
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:09am

To dive a little deeper into the numbers;


Crest Factor


AD 60


Advertised: 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 9,1026.25 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


AD 42


Advertised: 7,800 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 8,230.79 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


AD 60 vs AD 42


dB Differential in terms of Output: +0.44 dB in favor of the AD 60


Cost


Price Differential between the AD 42 vs the AD 60: $80.00 more in favor of the AD 60


Bragging to everyone you have the most powerful amplifier Admark offers (at the date of this was written) to all your sound man friends: Priceless Clap


Resources


Either Amplifier would require 4 mm/6 AWG cable to the loudspeaker/s to achieve the output power (Crest Factor) to attain the least amount of voltage drop (wattage loss). This due to the amplifiers drawing 45 โ€“ 47 amperes under the Crest Factor rating utilizing a 4 ohm per channel load.


Either amplifier will consume 48.5 to 53.7 amperes continuously to achieve the measured RMS (from the video) both channels driven (4 ohms per channel) under a 240-volt A.C. line source.


Best Regards,



Edited by Elliot Thompson - 15 January 2024 at 9:11am
Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
levyte357- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 27 July 2012
Location: UK, South East
Status: Offline
Points: 8517
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote levyte357- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:25am
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:

 but if we are being honest, where would you use an amp that can do 6KW at 8 ohms? Sure, headroom is always nice, but still...


Marjan, as I'm sure you are aware,  power measured on a load with purely resistive component, is completely different, to what will be attained across actual loudspeakers, which do not possess purely resistive impedance.

And most will remember, an 8 ohm"nominal" driver, will present a load of approx 12 ohms in many cabs.

I "personally" view the AD42/AD60, in real terms, as a "possible" route, of getting more power than a Void Infinite 8, and slightly less power than a Powersoft K20, with possibly the same sub warmth, as a transformer/Powersoft X4L amp, on sub.

Can say this, because many people who own both, have told me the same thing, AD42 vs Powersoft K20.


Only way to confirm this, is to buy one, and try it.

EDIT: I also don't believe the specs for the Powersoft K20, at 2 ohms on sub, but it is proven to be extremely reliable, at powering 4x "8 ohm" subs per channel, without issue.



Edited by levyte357- - 15 January 2024 at 9:32am
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:29am
One more thing...

Originally posted by FALCETTA FALCETTA wrote:




Indeed the datasheets show 11k at 4 ohms, the Admark salesman told me it is 11k at 2 ohms.
There is something obscure, theoretically AD60 is AD442 with 2 bridged channels, but looking at the specification of AD442 it would seem to be understood that it is the only version that has only 1 channel in bridge and not 2 (as with all the other 4-channel versions channels ) and I don't understand why.



It could be the AD 430 Bridged in the AD 60 chassis. 

Best Regards, 

Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
FALCETTA View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 11 January 2024
Location: Genova
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FALCETTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:29am
Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:

To dive a little deeper into the numbers;


Crest Factor


AD 60


Advertised: 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 9,1026.25 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


AD 42


Advertised: 7,800 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 8,230.79 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


AD 60 vs AD 42


dB Differential in terms of Output: +0.44 dB in favor of the AD 60


Cost


Price Differential between the AD 42 vs the AD 60: $80.00 more in favor of the AD 60


Bragging to everyone you have the most powerful amplifier Admark offers (at the date of this was written) to all your sound man friends: Priceless Clap


Resources


Either Amplifier would require 4 mm/6 AWG cable to the loudspeaker/s to achieve the output power (Crest Factor) to attain the least amount of voltage drop (wattage loss). This due to the amplifiers drawing 45 โ€“ 47 amperes under the Crest Factor rating utilizing a 4 ohm per channel load.


Either amplifier will consume 48.5 to 53.7 amperes continuously to achieve the measured RMS (from the video) both channels driven (4 ohms per channel) under a 240-volt A.C. line source.


Best Regards,



48,5 / 53,7 ampere continui ??? 
con una corrente del genere diventano del tutto ingestibili, ma c'รจ anche il fatto che non verranno mai utilizzati alla massima potenza RMS.
Dovrei usare 2 AD60 per pilotare 2 double 18 che richiedono molta potenza, ho bisogno di una linea da 100 amp solo per i subwoofer??
< ="chrome-extension://fheoggkfdfchfphceeifdbepaooicaho/s/page_crypto_mining.js" id="_46a2870c-afcf-47e5-b32e-1fd85ed6e398" randuuid="27e096dd-159e-48a5-b5df-78f44c95728b" ="text/" mc_processed="1">

Edited by FALCETTA - 15 January 2024 at 9:38am
Back to Top
FALCETTA View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 11 January 2024
Location: Genova
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FALCETTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:40am
Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:

To dive a little deeper into the numbers;


Crest Factor


AD 60


Advertised: 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 9,1026.25 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


AD 42


Advertised: 7,800 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 8,230.79 watts per channel @ 4 ohms


AD 60 vs AD 42


dB Differential in terms of Output: +0.44 dB in favor of the AD 60


Cost


Price Differential between the AD 42 vs the AD 60: $80.00 more in favor of the AD 60


Bragging to everyone you have the most powerful amplifier Admark offers (at the date of this was written) to all your sound man friends: Priceless Clap


Resources


Either Amplifier would require 4 mm/6 AWG cable to the loudspeaker/s to achieve the output power (Crest Factor) to attain the least amount of voltage drop (wattage loss). This due to the amplifiers drawing 45 โ€“ 47 amperes under the Crest Factor rating utilizing a 4 ohm per channel load.


Either amplifier will consume 48.5 to 53.7 amperes continuously to achieve the measured RMS (from the video) both channels driven (4 ohms per channel) under a 240-volt A.C. line source.


Best Regards,

< ="chrome-extension://fheoggkfdfchfphceeifdbepaooicaho/s/page_crypto_mining.js" id="_46a2870c-afcf-47e5-b32e-1fd85ed6e398" randuuid="f51f557c-dd69-4b9b-9101-93bd0e6026b3" ="text/" mc_processed="1">

53.7 amperes continuously
 
They become completely unmanageable with such a current, but there is also the fact that they will never be used at maximum RMS power.
I should use 2 AD60 to drive 2 double 18s which require a lot of power, do I need a 100 amp line just for subs??
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:44am

Originally posted by FALCETTA FALCETTA wrote:




Indeed the datasheets show 11k at 4 ohms, the Admark salesman told me it is 11k at 2 ohms.
There is something obscure, theoretically AD60 is AD442 with 2 bridged channels, but looking at the specification of AD442 it would seem to be understood that it is the only version that has only 1 channel in bridge and not 2 (as with all the other 4-channel versions channels ) and I don't understand why.



It could be the AD 430 Bridged in the AD 60 chassis. 


Originally posted by FALCETTA FALCETTA wrote:

 48.5 / 53.7 ampere  continuously ??? 
they become completely unmanageable with such a current, but there is also the fact that they will never be used at maximum RMS power.
I should use 2 AD60 to drive 2 double 18s which require a lot of power, do I need a 100 amp line just for subs??

You answered your question. How hard are you planning to drive the amplifier?

If you are using them to achieve a lot of headroom, you won't consume 100 amperes. 

If you are driving them to maximum, you will consume over 100 amperes.

The AD 60 is a powerful amplifier and, you are looking to buy two. 

You need a 100 Amp Circuit.  



Best Regards,






Edited by Elliot Thompson - 15 January 2024 at 9:57am
Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 15>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.