![]() |
CVR VS ADMARK VS OTHER |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 15> |
| Author | ||
MarjanM
Old Croc
Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 January 2024 at 6:17pm |
|
Elliot, that power should be at 8 ohms, not 4 ohms. I really considered getting one AD60 just to satisfy my curiosity, but if we are being honest, where would you use an amp that can do 6KW at 8 ohms? Sure, headroom is always nice, but still...
|
||
|
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
||
![]() |
||
FALCETTA
Registered User
Joined: 11 January 2024 Location: Genova Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 January 2024 at 8:14pm |
|
|
no, in the video it uses resistance at 4 ohm
|
||
![]() |
||
MarjanM
Old Croc
Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 January 2024 at 8:20pm |
|
|
But stated power of AD60 is 6000W at 8 ohm.
|
||
|
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
||
![]() |
||
FALCETTA
Registered User
Joined: 11 January 2024 Location: Genova Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 January 2024 at 9:15pm |
|
|
yes, but it's peak power, not RMS. that measurement was made at 4 Ohms
|
||
![]() |
||
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 3:15am |
|
That is what had me perplexed as well! Since I am going by what the author measured, I cannot say if the author had some means of limitation based upon a low current source or, Admark's Marketing team is coming into play (escalating the wattage). Since Admark rated the AD 60 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms Stereo mode, the RMS should hover around 7700 watts (Crest Factor 11,000 watts). Based on the measured 6440.06 watts RMS rating @ 4 ohms, the Crest Factor is 9106.25 watts.
The only solution is to buy one and conduct the same test as I did the Morin K 30. The harsh reality is I don't need it. This is why I haven't bought one.
Best Regards, Edited by Elliot Thompson - 15 January 2024 at 3:25am |
||
|
Elliot Thompson
|
||
![]() |
||
FALCETTA
Registered User
Joined: 11 January 2024 Location: Genova Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 8:04am |
|
That is what had me perplexed as well! Since I am going by what the author measured, I cannot say if the author had some means of limitation based upon a low current source or, Admark's Marketing team is coming into play (escalating the wattage). Since Admark rated the AD 60 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms Stereo mode, the RMS should hover around 7700 watts (Crest Factor 11,000 watts). Based on the measured 6440.06 watts RMS rating @ 4 ohms, the Crest Factor is 9106.25 watts.
The only solution is to buy one and conduct the same test as I did the Morin K 30. The harsh reality is I don't need it. This is why I haven't bought one.
Best Regards, Indeed the datasheets show 11k at 4 ohms, the Admark salesman told me it is 11k at 2 ohms. There is something obscure, theoretically AD60 is AD442 with 2 bridged channels, but looking at the specification of AD442 it would seem to be understood that it is the only version that has only 1 channel in bridge and not 2 (as with all the other 4-channel versions channels ) and I don't understand why. https://posts.org/ - ![]() Edited by FALCETTA - 15 January 2024 at 8:19am |
||
![]() |
||
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:09am |
|
|
To dive a little deeper into the numbers;
Crest Factor
AD 60
Advertised: 11,000 watts per channel @ 4 ohms
Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 9,1026.25 watts per channel @ 4 ohms
AD 42
Advertised: 7,800 watts per channel @ 4 ohms
Calculated based on the Measured RMS (from the Video): 8,230.79 watts per channel @ 4 ohms
AD 60 vs AD 42
dB Differential in terms of Output: +0.44 dB in favor of the AD 60
Cost
Price Differential between the AD 42 vs the AD 60: $80.00 more in favor of the AD 60
Bragging to everyone
you have the most powerful amplifier Admark offers (at the date of
this was written) to all your sound man friends: Priceless
Resources
Either Amplifier would require 4 mm/6 AWG cable to the loudspeaker/s to achieve the output power (Crest Factor) to attain the least amount of voltage drop (wattage loss). This due to the amplifiers drawing 45 โ 47 amperes under the Crest Factor rating utilizing a 4 ohm per channel load.
Either amplifier will consume 48.5 to 53.7 amperes continuously to achieve the measured RMS (from the video) both channels driven (4 ohms per channel) under a 240-volt A.C. line source. Best Regards, Edited by Elliot Thompson - 15 January 2024 at 9:11am |
||
|
Elliot Thompson
|
||
![]() |
||
levyte357-
Old Croc
Joined: 27 July 2012 Location: UK, South East Status: Offline Points: 8517 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:25am |
|
Marjan, as I'm sure you are aware, power measured on a load with purely resistive component, is completely different, to what will be attained across actual loudspeakers, which do not possess purely resistive impedance. And most will remember, an 8 ohm"nominal" driver, will present a load of approx 12 ohms in many cabs. I "personally" view the AD42/AD60, in real terms, as a "possible" route, of getting more power than a Void Infinite 8, and slightly less power than a Powersoft K20, with possibly the same sub warmth, as a transformer/Powersoft X4L amp, on sub. Can say this, because many people who own both, have told me the same thing, AD42 vs Powersoft K20. Only way to confirm this, is to buy one, and try it. EDIT: I also don't believe the specs for the Powersoft K20, at 2 ohms on sub, but it is proven to be extremely reliable, at powering 4x "8 ohm" subs per channel, without issue. Edited by levyte357- - 15 January 2024 at 9:32am |
||
|
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.
|
||
![]() |
||
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:29am |
|
|
One more thing...
It could be the AD 430 Bridged in the AD 60 chassis. Best Regards, |
||
|
Elliot Thompson
|
||
![]() |
||
FALCETTA
Registered User
Joined: 11 January 2024 Location: Genova Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:29am |
|
48,5 / 53,7 ampere continui ??? con una corrente del genere diventano del tutto ingestibili, ma c'รจ anche il fatto che non verranno mai utilizzati alla massima potenza RMS. Dovrei usare 2 AD60 per pilotare 2 double 18 che richiedono molta potenza, ho bisogno di una linea da 100 amp solo per i subwoofer?? Edited by FALCETTA - 15 January 2024 at 9:38am |
||
![]() |
||
FALCETTA
Registered User
Joined: 11 January 2024 Location: Genova Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:40am |
|
53.7 amperes continuously They become completely unmanageable with such a current, but there is also the fact that they will never be used at maximum RMS power. I should use 2 AD60 to drive 2 double 18s which require a lot of power, do I need a 100 amp line just for subs?? |
||
![]() |
||
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2024 at 9:44am |
|
It could be the AD 430 Bridged in the AD 60 chassis.
You answered your question. How hard are you planning to drive the amplifier? If you are using them to achieve a lot of headroom, you won't consume 100 amperes. If you are driving them to maximum, you will consume over 100 amperes. The AD 60 is a powerful amplifier and, you are looking to buy two. You need a 100 Amp Circuit. Best Regards, Edited by Elliot Thompson - 15 January 2024 at 9:57am |
||
|
Elliot Thompson
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 15> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |