Difference between HD15 & HD215 |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
qmastah
Registered User Joined: 28 October 2011 Status: Offline Points: 138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 21 November 2011 at 3:39pm |
Hey Everyone,
Debating on a kick design and right now considering both options. Is there a noticeable difference between the HD15 and the HD215 in term of frequency response and efficiency? Sounds like the HD15 would be easier to transport. Q |
|
djeddie
Old Croc Joined: 26 April 2004 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 4125 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As an HD215 is two HD15 cabinets in a single cab, the frequency response will go very slightly lower and you should get an extra 3dB provided you have the extra power. And yes, the HD15 would be easier to transport.
|
|
Chas n Dave : it's like Drum and Bass but with beards. E=mc² ±3dB
|
|
james4001
Registered User Joined: 30 September 2010 Location: Northumberland Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Do 2 HD15 cabs placed together like the HD215 perform the same? I would personally just build HD15s but i must admit the 215 does look pretty cool!
|
|
toastyghost
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 09 January 2007 Location: Manchester Status: Offline Points: 10919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
A single HD15 is an awkward heavy cube with a PD154. Build HD215s, put a wheelbarrow style handle and castor set in them, and thank me later.
|
|
Risc_Terilia
Young Croc Joined: 15 December 2007 Status: Offline Points: 699 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've always thought of an HD as a pretty light box. |
|
Tocooltom
Young Croc Joined: 07 March 2011 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thats what i thought, its just a cube with 2 main panels and 2 small panels with a driver, it doesnt get much lighter than that for a bass cab does it? I would go for the 215, less trips to the van with a slight increase in weight, a 215 is big enough to put wheels on which IMO is much better than lifting and carrying boxes around! |
|
qmastah
Registered User Joined: 28 October 2011 Status: Offline Points: 138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm thinking about using the HDs on top of 18" Super Scoopers.
What do you guys think would be a good x over frequency for the hd215 compared to the hd15 to take advantage of the extra boost at the lower end. This is what I'm thinking about: 0-70hz: 18" Super Scoop loaded with Fane colossus 70-160hz: HD215 with Eminence kappa |
|
Tocooltom
Young Croc Joined: 07 March 2011 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
not much point in changing the xover freq, especially if you runing them above scoops, the extra low end you get from the HD215 will be covered by the scoops anyway. Leave the crossover as it is, but you dont want to be running your drivers down to 0hz do you?
|
|
qmastah
Registered User Joined: 28 October 2011 Status: Offline Points: 138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
right, I meant
30-70 70-160 Even though the super scooper can pick up the lower HD215 frequencies, I'm thinking the HD might be better at the 70-90 range and generate a harder kick. so the extra boost from the HD215 would really be overhead. anways, I agree that the HD215 looks cooler! |
|
Tocooltom
Young Croc Joined: 07 March 2011 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
there's not much point building loading and running a set of cabs to cover 20hz of mid bass is there?
Run the HDs up to 160 like they are supposed to, let your mid tops do the rest, nothing will be strained unless you push it and the system will sound fine. if you want slightly more kick once the system is built, use your EQ to add it in. They will not generate a "harder kick", they will just handle more watts within a smaller freq range |
|
qmastah
Registered User Joined: 28 October 2011 Status: Offline Points: 138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That's what I meant: 30-70: Super Scoops 70-160: HD215 160 Up: MT121 I was just saying that HD215 might be better at 70-90 range than scoops. |
|
toastyghost
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 09 January 2007 Location: Manchester Status: Offline Points: 10919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's not the weight, it's the distribution of it and the opportunities for handle placement plus lack of castors. You end up hand balling a lot more than you really need to, and there's almost no benefits over doubles because you wouldn't really ever use them in singles. |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |