Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Plans > Scoops
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fane scaled up
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Fane scaled up
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 13>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
mykey- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 03 March 2010
Location: ID/UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6114 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote mykey- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Fane scaled up
    Posted: 21 December 2012 at 7:53am
Hi Chaps

I had 16 of these around 1989. I had great pleasure with them. They were loaded with the Fane 400 Colossus. Pretty scary when all 16 were running....ask Tre4u2nv LOL

Anyways, I have drawn up 2 versions. One as standard and the other with a double baffle and segmented scoop.

Second version is also slightly deeper, as well as a deeper chamber to receive deeper drivers

Width should be 61cm (24'')... do the cab wider to gain a larger chamber

chamber is 57 litres without the driver

Handle placements and cut off rear for castors is up to you to do

I'm 100% sure that with the Royals and the new monster Fanes these will sing







  EnjoyTongue


Edited by mykey- - 04 January 2013 at 7:26am
Back to Top
vragas View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 29 July 2007
Location: Cyprus
Status: Offline
Points: 148 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vragas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 8:41am
Thumbs Up
Back to Top
JR.junior View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 14 December 2009
Location: Slovenija
Status: Offline
Points: 1789 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JR.junior Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 8:49am
Very good, sir! Thumbs Up
Support the scoop technology, larger mouth plays louder!
Back to Top
Nitz V1505 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 16 September 2009
Location: UXBRIDGE
Status: Offline
Points: 1719 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nitz V1505 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 10:22am
Cheers Mykey!!!!
LET THE BASS ROLL LIKE THUNDER
& THE TOPS LIKE LIGHTNING.....
Back to Top
mykey- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 03 March 2010
Location: ID/UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6114 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mykey- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 5:38pm
No probs....

For those who want a bigger chamber but want to keep the 61cm wide (24'') you will need to play with the rear baffle length (450mm) if you make this shorter to 425 this will give you a rear chamber volume of 70 litres minus the driver. So subtract your driver volume from 70. 


Edited by mykey- - 04 February 2013 at 2:25pm
Back to Top
JR.junior View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 14 December 2009
Location: Slovenija
Status: Offline
Points: 1789 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JR.junior Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 5:50pm
Dimension of the throat and rear pannel (450mm?)?
Support the scoop technology, larger mouth plays louder!
Back to Top
mykey- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 03 March 2010
Location: ID/UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6114 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mykey- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 6:02pm
Not sure what you're asking Junior?

if you want a larger chamber of 70 litres the rear baffle length would be 394mm as above post

do you need both throat areas of both chamber sizes?
Back to Top
mykey- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 03 March 2010
Location: ID/UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6114 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mykey- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 6:23pm
standard scoop throat area is 539

larger chambered throat area is 861

You can't just shorten between the 2 numbers and expect a larger chamber though.
    I'll explain.....lets say you wanted to shorten the rear baffle to give a throat area of 700, you won't be gaining any volume of the rear chamber, just gaining throat area. You will have to go to 861 throat area to gain more volume of the rear chamber. Nothing wrong with gaining throat area, it's all about tuning to what you want with what driver you have.

if crossed over high the standard scoop will play more like a PA bin. If the rear baffle is shortened and crossed at the same point it will play as if it's crossed lower.......giving that psycho acoustic feeling as if it's playing lower.....taking the hard edge off the sound, bit like the sound of a Wattco scoopWink

But I don't want to confuse things and the standard scoop sounds great. The larger chamber is there for people that have drivers like 1850 etc
Back to Top
scott_fury View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 28 October 2012
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 319 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scott_fury Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 6:30pm
....and I was only expecting socks this Christmas. Nice one....!

Edited by scott_fury - 21 December 2012 at 6:57pm
Back to Top
JR.junior View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 14 December 2009
Location: Slovenija
Status: Offline
Points: 1789 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JR.junior Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 6:30pm
if you shorten rear baffle you get larger throat so more lows, but you shorten the horn pathz very  and the chamber size decrease. Side effects: less overall SPL and one-notish scoop.

Support the scoop technology, larger mouth plays louder!
Back to Top
mykey- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 03 March 2010
Location: ID/UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6114 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mykey- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 6:43pm
Not really because we are only talking shortening the horn by very minor amounts. This design scoop will never be one-notey. And chamber size will increase not decrease.

Here's an easier one.....if you shorten/adjust the bottom of chamber panel that is now 209mm to 123mm wide this will give you a rear chamber size of 58 litres minus the driver and a throat area of 780.

SBC who is Saul has just had some Fane scoops built. Don't suppose he would tell us what mod he has done but it would be interesting if there are any of the above been usedThumbs UpWink






Edited by mykey- - 04 February 2013 at 2:29pm
Back to Top
JR.junior View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 14 December 2009
Location: Slovenija
Status: Offline
Points: 1789 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JR.junior Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 December 2012 at 6:57pm
Originally posted by mykey- mykey- wrote:

Not sure what you're asking Junior?

if you want a larger chamber of 70 litres the rear baffle length would be 394mm as above post

do you need both throat areas of both chamber sizes?


I mean this dimension, see arrows.
Support the scoop technology, larger mouth plays louder!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.062 seconds.