Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Plans > MT122
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 121 vs 122
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

121 vs 122

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Blackmarket View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 16 October 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Blackmarket Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 121 vs 122
    Posted: 25 October 2007 at 7:17am
Hey hey

So i've searched and I'm finding odd results... looking for views on a simple question. Is the MT122 worth it (some seem to think not) or is the 121 the way forward.

Looking for cabs to form part of a PA that'll be used predominantely for house and techno.

Also, suggestions on subs? Really dig the 1850 vibe, 4 per side minimum!

Feedback appreciated, please send all derogatory/negative/useless comments to info@bbc.co.uk
Back to Top
Disco Stu View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 03 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Disco Stu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 10:48pm
Depends whats going on underneath - MT122 will get down to around 140Hz, MT121 probably more like 200Hz - if you need lower you either need a different mid top, or you need a good kickbin between the subs and tops.
 
Stu
All you need to know is:
Sensitivity + Power Handling - Power Compression = Max Output

My acts:
www.myspace.com/thebowiexperience
www.myspace.com/scheisseelektronisches
Back to Top
Richard Hart View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 08 November 2005
Location: Leeds
Status: Offline
Points: 643
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Richard Hart Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 4:20pm
That's what I would have thought, but the recent shootout plots show the 121 to be capable of playing down to around 130 ish.
 
Edit: Link


Edited by Richard Hart - 26 October 2007 at 4:27pm
Back to Top
Disco Stu View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 03 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Disco Stu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 11:19pm
Assuming that measurement was taken at 1W/1M it doesnt display the driver excursion so I cant be sure but I would suggest that below the bottom bump at 170 the driver excursion starts to go up quite rapidly
 
The average sensitivity in that area would cause me to cross it over at around 140
 
Either way - still a difficult frequency to reach with most wide bandwidth horn subs without colouration, its not a HUGE problem if you have the right bin
 
Stu
All you need to know is:
Sensitivity + Power Handling - Power Compression = Max Output

My acts:
www.myspace.com/thebowiexperience
www.myspace.com/scheisseelektronisches
Back to Top
Heathrow_B_line View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 January 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Heathrow_B_line Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 October 2007 at 2:00am
measurements were indeed taken at 1W/1M
Produce a killer sound. Take no prisoners.
Back to Top
Disco Stu View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 03 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Disco Stu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 October 2007 at 12:00pm

I think a better result would have been obtained 100W @ 10M

Has anyone done an excursion plot for the MT121?

Stu
All you need to know is:
Sensitivity + Power Handling - Power Compression = Max Output

My acts:
www.myspace.com/thebowiexperience
www.myspace.com/scheisseelektronisches
Back to Top
tb_mike View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 01 October 2004
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2744
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tb_mike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 October 2007 at 8:55pm
I agree stu, Important point. Excursion will increase greatly at cutoff,which you dont see on the SPL 1/w graph.

Crossing higher would be sensible.Perhaps a mutation of the 121 single 12" with slightly longer path length is in order?
Back to Top
adambomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 10 April 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3220
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adambomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 October 2007 at 11:04pm
I agree that the measurements should have been done at a greater distance.. then converted to 1w/1m for ease of comparison.
 
Should have been 2m/2w atleast... hindsight is a wonderful thing!
 
What I can say is all of the boxes on test that day took one channel of an ep2500 hitting it's limiter (light flickering most of the time) into 8ohms for over 10mins each... approx 300w... without any signs of harm... and for the most part sounded good doing it...
 
Never any hint of breaking up, over excusrion or distortion from the mt121... which was crossed (under Rog's instruction) at 140hz.


Edited by adambomb - 31 October 2007 at 11:08pm
Back to Top
Jhodas View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 04 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jhodas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2007 at 12:26am
so 121s can play that low. nice.
I smell a system...

MT121s
HD15s
Scoops

ouch....
Until the Lions have their own historians, tales of hunting will always glorify the hunter.
Back to Top
adambomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 10 April 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3220
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adambomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2007 at 9:14am
I well tried and tested system! That setup has been done before... but most would opt for X1s over scoops.
 
Are you SURE you want scoops??
Back to Top
adambomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 10 April 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3220
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adambomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2007 at 9:20am
hmm.. reading this thread again...
 
If your going for 1850s.. then I would build MT122... for the extra height and more balanced sound.
Back to Top
norty303 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: Eastbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 8800
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote norty303 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 November 2007 at 6:05pm
The reason for building the MT121 was primarily due to size and weight considerations.  They're not light in 121 format.  It was then found that you didn't often need the second 12" in situations where it was dance music.
 
With HD15's underneath I struggle to see why you'd need the 2 12" drivers, especially as most mid/top boxes these days seem to make do with a single 12" and either small format cone driver or large format comp driver.


Edited by norty303 - 03 November 2007 at 6:07pm
My laser stuff: Frikkin Lasers
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.