![]() |
Camco vortex 6, 1R stable? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Camco vortex 6, 1R stable?Posted: 03 May 2009 at 4:43pm |
what about 4 drives bridged of a camco vortex 6, which is apparently stable to 1ohm. ive often wandered this but not given it a go through fear of killing something... in parralle mono output (can someone explain this?) the peak output is rated at 8180W and 6600W at 1omh mono parralle actully can someone just explain these ratings to me? we did try it once in mono parrallel and the output was HUGE cheers chris |
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 4:43pm |
|
http://www.camcoaudio.com/Vortex.html
|
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
ceharden
The 10,000 Points Club
Joined: 05 June 2005 Location: Southampton Status: Offline Points: 11851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 5:11pm |
|
It can drive to one ohm in parallel mono. Ie it parallels both channels so that each one is seeing 2 Ohms. This is not the same as bridged mono where the channels are run in series.
|
|
![]() |
|
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 5:27pm |
|
ah rite... so if 4 subs where run of the bridged output in para-mono mode it would pressent 1ohm to both channels but these linked in para will pressent 2ohm at the output stage???
the equation for resitances in para is 1/RT= 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3.... by this rule the 2x 1omh reststances would equal 0.5omh surely? have i missed something here? |
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
andyamp
Old Croc
Joined: 21 July 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2119 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 5:52pm |
|
Chris come on
|
|
|
a wise man changes his mind a fool does not.
http://www.matrixamplification.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 6:11pm |
|
what... i realy dont get it
#
what am i missing?
|
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 6:14pm |
|
When you Bridge an amplifier, it will deliver more voltage so, you can use one or two 8-ohm speakers together.
Parallel Mono is good when you are using multiple speakers so the amplifier can send more current to drive four to eight 8-ohm speakers. Bridge Mono = More voltage, half the current. Parallel Mono = More current, half the voltage. Best Regards, |
|
|
Elliot Thompson
|
|
![]() |
|
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 6:45pm |
|
so i may be better of running 6 punishers of it in parallel mono rather then 3 a side?
unless anyone can give reasons why not to do it il give it a try next week... |
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 7:06pm |
|
You could try and see which configuration sounds better to you. Current demands comes into play more when the driver's impedance dip lower than it’s nominal rating. For example three 8 –ohm speakers are 2.666666-> ohms. Pending on the impedance of the cabinet (The Punisher) the source (The music material’s frequencies) and, how the speakers react under those conditions three punishers can be 16 ohms or 1.6 ohms. Best Regards, Edited by Elliot Thompson - 03 May 2009 at 7:08pm |
|
|
Elliot Thompson
|
|
![]() |
|
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 7:08pm |
|
il give it a go and post up the results
|
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
andyamp
Old Croc
Joined: 21 July 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2119 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 7:47pm |
|
these Camco amps class D ?
|
|
|
a wise man changes his mind a fool does not.
http://www.matrixamplification.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
VPAS
Registered User
Joined: 05 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1203 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2009 at 7:53pm |
|
class H
|
|
|
n^2 modulo -P = number wang
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |