![]() |
JF Vented Horn (P-audio E18-600a) |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 7> |
| Author | ||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: JF Vented Horn (P-audio E18-600a)Posted: 04 April 2008 at 10:14am |
|
|
Ok, im have a final design for a ported horn, im going to prototype it in about a month, if anyone knows of any reason i should re-design this or scrap it let them speak now or forever hold their peace!
The design looks a little like this: But picture the port folded so you can get the driver out of the top, (outer dimentions will be something like 818mm x 636mm x 636mm)
The mouth is 3600cm2 not 4800 as the diagram states.Input Parameters:
![]() Sensitivity 1w/1m: (bear in mind the idea is to EQ the tuning freq up (37Hz) as there is V low excursion at this point)
![]() Driver excursion plot at 700w - probably the most i'll put through these....
![]() I know the xmax isnt rated at 10mm, but i've been talking about this before and i was thinking of giving it a try anyway....
Heres the little fellas!:
![]() Edited by Jake_Fielder - 08 April 2008 at 3:39pm |
||
![]() |
||
jethrocker
Old Croc
Joined: 07 June 2006 Location: Chiapas, Mexico Status: Offline Points: 1942 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 10:32am |
|
|
Just wondering when looking at the plots how the eq will work out. The problem is in order to get a flat response down to the port tuning frequency you're going to need to apply boost from just under 37 up to about 55Hz...this is taking you into the area of peak excursion above the tuning frequency, so your excursion might be worse than predicted. It's always said HR excursion plots are exaggerated, but I'm never sure by how much, I'm guessing it's not likely to be worse overall in reality than the 11mm on the plot.
You're other option is to eq with a bit of a dip around 55Hz, might give you higher overall safe output, but also a particular sound, which might be what you want.. |
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 10:34am |
|
|
Yes, i think there will be a dip, i'll just find what i wrote about it before... i also think i drew a pic of what it might look like.....
|
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 10:40am |
|
|
This is what i predicted it may look like:
![]() Obviously when i prototype it i will work out the best EQ to get the plot as flat and low as possible without increacing excursion beyond the highest it is now.
|
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 10:46am |
|
Thats what i thought originally, and i know its a risky buisness, but if this works and has a reasonable flatish output from 35-180 with a bit of EQ and sound half decent then it'll be a great result for a single cab of that size....
|
||
![]() |
||
darkmatter
Old Croc
Joined: 26 February 2005 Location: LDN Status: Offline Points: 2419 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 1:19pm |
|
|
Will using eq affect the phase around that point, or is that not something you really need to worry about?
|
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 1:32pm |
|
|
I'm not sure, if it did affect the phase what would happen?
i was just going to use delay to match the top frequency ~Hz to what ever mid tops i use, then not worry about what happens bellow the crossover point. I haven't prototyped any of my designs yet so i don't know if I'm doing it right,
I think that the tuning of this cab will be different to whats been predicted, so 'I'll just have to work it out after i build it, i defiantly don't want to eq the wrong bit! IE anywhere thats not the tuning frequency!
Come to think of it, this design is also a parallel 6th order bandpass with a flared port.
|
||
![]() |
||
darkmatter
Old Croc
Joined: 26 February 2005 Location: LDN Status: Offline Points: 2419 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 3:14pm |
|
no idea i was hoping you could tell me ![]() i guess i was just wondering whether you'd effectively be changing the group delay by having to eq the signal that goes into the cab. but im probably worrying about nothing as the difference would no doubt be imperceptible - people like scoops so... yeah would kind of destroy the point in going for a good value driver if you have to go through 4 just finding the eq point lol ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 3:27pm |
|
|
When i build it im going to put a tone from a signal generator through an amp (about 200w) and go up and down until i find the tuning point (where the driver moves least), then EQ the hell out of it at that point!!
|
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 3:30pm |
|
As far as i know, using any EQ or limiter or crossover will shift the phase slightly, depending on what type of filter is used...
Ha, yep, im gonna have to be careful, Hopefully once i have done all the complicated stuff i can draw up a design that anyone can use, as a simple buget speaker, with a good frequency range! (fingers crossed!) Edited by Jake_Fielder - 26 August 2009 at 6:03pm |
||
![]() |
||
Disco Stu
Old Croc
Joined: 03 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2492 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2008 at 6:11pm |
|
|
Hi Jake I would be tempted to do a couple of things to try and even out the cone loading, as I remember the E18 driver has quite a thin cone.
1) Reverse the driver to aid heat escaping 2) Mount the driver parallel to the back wall of the cab if possible to prevent some uneven stresses caused by one side of the cone being closer to a surface than the other. Stu |
||
|
All you need to know is:
Sensitivity + Power Handling - Power Compression = Max Output My acts: www.myspace.com/thebowiexperience www.myspace.com/scheisseelektronisches |
||
![]() |
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc
Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 April 2008 at 10:14am |
|
|
The loading will be better than the pic i put up, i have since drawn it out to scale and it looks much better, the chamber in front of the driver is almost symetrical (in 2d) and the port is folded in such a way that the rear chamber isnt too bad. I thought as its ported it would be better that way round? especially at the tuning freq, as all the air is moving through the port, but i would have thought that above the tuning freq the horn side was cooler....? what do you think?
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 7> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |