Compact 2 way fullrange cabinet |
Post Reply | Page <1 234 |
Author | ||
Monkeys
Registered User Joined: 30 August 2012 Location: Melbourne - Aus Status: Offline Points: 429 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
What, really? So what is the quoted 45w per channel referring to then??
|
||
APW
Young Croc Joined: 13 November 2012 Location: Kent, UK Status: Offline Points: 1174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
24 volt battery
|
||
Monkeys
Registered User Joined: 30 August 2012 Location: Melbourne - Aus Status: Offline Points: 429 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Oh, right. Yeah ok so they will do that quoted power if powered by 24v DC, that's fine. |
||
Monkeys
Registered User Joined: 30 August 2012 Location: Melbourne - Aus Status: Offline Points: 429 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I do appreciate all the advice, I really do. I'm not sure that I'm making clear the priorities for this project though. And I do understand that what I am suggesting is going to require significant sacrifices in efficiency and loudness for the sake of a bit of low end. I have a fairly massive 240v rig (12 x Punishers, 4 x MKB12's, 6 x TSE111's, 2x TMS4's) and access to generators already =P I'm really not looking to throw parties with the speakers from this project, I would use my rig (or part thereof) for that. This project is meant to be an attempt to make a really nice bluetooth speaker. To be able to have some easy, fairly compact, high quality, portable speakers which will take seconds to set up, will still produce a fairly full range sound (albeit at reduced volume). They don't need to be able to play for days on end, 8 hours at max volume (100ish db) would suffice, I think... If I really need them to run for longer than that I can bring an extra battery or a small generator. Thinking, more a portable studio monitor rather than PA speaker? |
||
Monkeys
Registered User Joined: 30 August 2012 Location: Melbourne - Aus Status: Offline Points: 429 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ok, update and advice pleas? I have done some further research in an attempt to find some middle ground and gain efficiency, without compromising too much on box size and bass extension.
I have come to the conclusion that I think will use a high efficiency 8" bass-mid driver, in a 25L (internal) volume box. This should get me around 90-92db efficiency and a fairly flat response to 50hz with the right driver. I have narrowed it down to 4 driver choices, which I would appreciate any advice on. Beyma 8P300Fe/N - Pros - Best efficiency (92.5db), Looks very durable and heavy duty (should be resistant to power compression?), reviews say it can be crossed around 1500-2khs with the right tweeter on a waveguide. Cons - Slightly lower bass response than most of the other options (90db from 50 - 100hz), quite expensive ScanSpeak Classic P21WO20 Pros - Very good bass response, flat to 50hz. Tried and tested classic driver, great sound quality based on reviews Cons - Lower efficincy (89.5db) SEAS - Ca22RNY
Pros - Quite good efficiency (91.5), smooth bass rolloff from 100hz. Great reviews, relatively affordable Cons - Very light construction, looks like it may not be very durable? Peerless - HDS-P830869 Pros - Best bass response, nice hump at 50-100 hz. Easily the cheapest Cons - Lower efficiency (90.5db), nomex probably not be the most durable? Unsure about crossover frequency. Any advice on the above greatly appreciated =) |
||
Monkeys
Registered User Joined: 30 August 2012 Location: Melbourne - Aus Status: Offline Points: 429 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ok I am thinking I will go with the Seas Ca22RNY, but in a larger cabinet size of 36L internal volume. I plan to crossover to the tweeter at 1.5khz. The tweeter I am looking at is the Wavecor TW030WA11
I've modeled the CA22RNY in WinISD in a 36L box, tuned to 53hz, with a 6.8cm diameter and 5.77cm length port. This gives the following results: Sensitivity of 91.5db F3 of 50hz and F9 of 40hz 1st port resonance is 2979hz Maximum rear port air velocity at 50w is 26 m/s. Response curve shows a hump at around 70hz up to 92.5db. Can anyone see anything fundamentally wrong with this design? The port length seems fairly short, shorter than it is long, is that right?
I would have preferred to go with a lower tuning frequency to get slightly more bass extension but since I am planning to cross over at 1500hz, I need to get the port resonance up to around double that (or greater). Is this really necessary? Edited by Monkeys - 10 February 2020 at 9:35pm |
||
Monkeys
Registered User Joined: 30 August 2012 Location: Melbourne - Aus Status: Offline Points: 429 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Can anyone please advise if there appears to be anything wrong with this design? Apart from the obvious lack of efficiency for an "ideal" 12v system etc. I am OK with that, I just want to know if the cabinet design and sim etc looks OK.
Would it be possible to reduce the port resonance to say around 2khz without too much issue? I have read that damping the port can significantly reduce port resonances. This would be ideal for me if it is possible since it would mean I could get away with a smaller box.. |
||
Post Reply | Page <1 234 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |