Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Newbie Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Double 10" Sealed Enclosure Advice please
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Double 10" Sealed Enclosure Advice please

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 12>
Author
Message
APW View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 13 November 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Online
Points: 1174
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote APW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2020 at 10:58am

there is already several threads on cabinet stuffing, Basically you don't need to worry about the stuffing volume…. Again this is a personal thing but I prefer to use polyester wadding (the Duvet stuffing stuff!!)  rather than the foam

https://forum.speakerplans.com/acoustic-wadding_topic45924.html

PS… I have just found a thread regarding stuffing the box vs effective volume and you are the OP.

https://forum.speakerplans.com/speaker-enclosure-size-affecting-damping-foam_topic104999.html



Edited by APW - 18 April 2020 at 11:01am
Back to Top
Jack1991 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 05 February 2020
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jack1991 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2020 at 11:05am
Cool cheers man. 

Yes i know i made a thread asking about damping volume. I am just was seeking others opinions. As you literally just said the opposite to Peter Jan earlier about the centre panel. So i like to ask others just to get there opinions on things too.

Thanks again man appreciate the help 😀👍🏼


Edited by Jack1991 - 18 April 2020 at 11:06am
Back to Top
APW View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 13 November 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Online
Points: 1174
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote APW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2020 at 11:19am

Peter isn't wrong about the panel, both arguments are correct and will work just fine,  I just pointed out that are some possible benefits in keeping the panel in place and it’s down to personal preference.

 When building speakers there are many trade-offs that have to be made, you have to build to your requirements and taste ….. One size most certainly does not fit all in the audio world!!

Back to Top
Jack1991 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 05 February 2020
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jack1991 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2020 at 12:06pm
Of course yes, i understand, pros & cons and also personal preference to it all, thats why i like to get various peoples views as im very new to it all.

A lot more to it than i first realised but its really interesting learning about it all. So i appreciate your help 
Back to Top
Peter Jan View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 16 December 2008
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 1019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Peter Jan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2020 at 3:55pm
Originally posted by APW APW wrote:

Peter isn't wrong about the panel, both arguments are correct and will work just fine,  I just pointed out that are some possible benefits in keeping the panel in place and it’s down to personal preference.

 When building speakers there are many trade-offs that have to be made, you have to build to your requirements and taste ….. One size most certainly does not fit all in the audio world!!


Yes, I just meant you can leave it out from a strict technical standpoint, determining cab volume, tuning,...
But the bigger a cab is, the more some kind of bracing is needed to avoid large surface panels from unwanted resonating, so put some ribs in or a whole panel and cut some “meat”, because that works just as well as a whole panel.. and saves a bit of weight.
By the way, you’re not going to find many commercial available cabs pro/hifi/car/... with seperate chambers for each speaker doing the same frequency band and/or connected to the same amplifier channel. While it is possible a speaker going bust, because it’s brother cuts out for some reason, but it’s very, very unlikely, even when flogged hard. Besides open circuit is just one way of going wrong, but what about burned/shorted and/or coil mechanically blocked in the gap ? The connected amp is much more lickely to protest. 
I agree many decisions are more personal preference, than true technical need.
Back to Top
APW View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 13 November 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Online
Points: 1174
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote APW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 April 2020 at 5:23pm

I agree with you that not many commercial designs have separate chambers for each driver, technically it makes very little difference to the performance of a well braced design and removing the centre reduces the size and weight slightly….

…. however I have had this exact mode of failure in the past: For many years I ran 8 dual 18, shared chamber cabinets (classic G-sub style enclosure but a little larger) that were loaded with Fane 18XB Colossus 600 drivers, on one of the drivers the tinsel wire failed mid gig (probably due to the age of the drivers), shortly afterwards the 2nd driver failed in the same cabinet, this time with mechanical damage to the VC (Voice coil detached from bobbin and damage to the end of the bobbin from contact with the back of the pole plate), the 14 other drivers in the other 7 cabinets were  all OK as was the driver with the broken tinsel once the tinsel had been replaced, the other driver had to be re-coned!   



Edited by APW - 18 April 2020 at 5:24pm
Back to Top
Chris Grimshaw View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 10 September 2018
Location: Sheffield
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chris Grimshaw Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2020 at 6:10pm
Originally posted by Jack1991 Jack1991 wrote:

Cool okay yeh that makes sense too. Thanks 

How about the egg box lining displacement? Or do I not need to account for that as its like a open cell, rather than solid mass?


I did some measurements recently - I'll see if I can dig them out.

Anyway, I use wool carpet underlay. One layer over most of the internal walls, and added a couple of extra layers at the top and bottom, since there was a fairly strong standing wave in that direction.

The impedance curve went from bumpy (lots of small peaks) to smooth in the 700-1kHz range, indicating those resonances had been damped out.
In terms of frequency response, there had been a narrow dip/peak combo in that region, which also disappeared. Cleaner midrange immediately.

Chris
Quality sound from Sheffield
www.grimshawaudio.com
Back to Top
Jack1991 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 05 February 2020
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jack1991 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2020 at 8:28pm
Oh cool thats good to know thanks Chris 🙂👍🏼

Im surprised at the different materials people use and seem to work well. Pillows, Duvets, Carpet underlay. All a fair bit cheaper than "branded" damping materials too. Dead handy
Back to Top
Chris Grimshaw View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 10 September 2018
Location: Sheffield
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chris Grimshaw Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2020 at 9:16pm
Yeah, I just picked up a big roll of the stuff and use it as/when needed. It does shed a little, but shaking it out gets most of the loose fibres out before installation.

Chris
Quality sound from Sheffield
www.grimshawaudio.com
Back to Top
Jack1991 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 05 February 2020
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jack1991 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 April 2020 at 4:45pm
To save making a new thread for 1 question. For my tops im building a seperate box. This will house 2x 1" compression drivers mounted on horns and also the 2x passive crossovers. Id like to know if they can be fitted quite close together as there wont be much room inside. The comp driver is like a big magnet so i was worried that it might do something to the crossover??

Or would i be best to fit a ply panel between the 2 like the second photo.


Back to Top
DMorison View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 14 March 2007
Location: Aberdeen
Status: Offline
Points: 1649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DMorison Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 April 2020 at 1:21pm
A ply panel will do nothing to stop a magnetic field, FWIW.
Back to Top
Jack1991 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 05 February 2020
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jack1991 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 April 2020 at 1:32pm
Originally posted by DMorison DMorison wrote:

A ply panel will do nothing to stop a magnetic field, FWIW.

Oh okay it would be 15mm the same as the rest of the enclosure. I did put a piece of 15mm ply between the driver and a piece of magnetic metal and it doesnt get pulled to it. So im not saying your wrong but i dont understand why that wouldnt work?

What would you suggest instead then please? Or does it not matter anyway?

There will be a 50mm gap between the crossover and the comp driver magnet.


Edited by Jack1991 - 29 April 2020 at 3:14pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.