21" reflext enclosure needed |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | |
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thank you Walter for your excellent detailed reply that helps me a lot, one problem I have is, Beyma measured the peak SPL output at 137db using pink noise with a 6db Crest Factor I can't see how you could get more output from a single 21" reflex sub than that. So making the ports bigger would you say it's reasonable that even doing that would result in SPL output being not even noticeably higher? Unless it's gonna get 3db or more higher output it's probably not worth taking the time to design an enclosure with bigger ports as it'd mean pretty much re-designing the whole enclosure and testing it out once built then adjusting all for less than for example 3db output.
Edited by Mel_Gibson - 05 December 2020 at 11:02am |
|
Contour
Young Croc Joined: 03 March 2004 Status: Offline Points: 620 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The ports indeed may be perfectly sized for the required optimal reflex tuning, but same tuning can be achieved using larger area, but longer port. The larger port area results in less port losses and higher output. In some cases however, the ports are designed so small on purpose, it effectively changes the cabinet tuning to a higher frequency when the driver warms up and it T/S parameters change, resulting is a more optimal design when the driver is working on its limit.
Best regards, Walter
|
|
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
By the way I was joking with that little kid and her face, lol. But seriously ok if the ports ARE too small what size ports would be ideal? Plus also i'm rubbish at carpentry so would getting a cabinet maker to make me up the enclosure be a good idea? If I had a decent plan for him to follow I mean. I've tried using WinISD and I have no idea so rather than take months to learn how to use it and learning to understand the results i'm seeing i'd rather get an enclosure designed as well as made.
Edited by Mel_Gibson - 04 December 2020 at 9:59pm |
|
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well they tested the enclosure and got peaks of 137db with pink noise with a 6db crest factor so all I can say to you is : Edited by Mel_Gibson - 04 December 2020 at 7:58pm |
|
smitske96
Young Croc Joined: 16 February 2016 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1085 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This.
|
|
Noyzmunky
Young Croc Joined: 10 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
''We can assure you the cabinet is tested and the ports size is 100% correct when you consider the compromises inherent in the design...''
There, I fixed their reply for you. I can well imagine your email to them having read your replies on here... Were you expecting anything else to come back from them than ''it's fine'' |
|
my name is Inigo Montoya...you killed my father, prepare to die!.
|
|
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Right I received an email reply from Beyma about the ports on the 21LEX1600nd enclosure plans supposedly being too small as said on this forum and they said word for word :
Good morning
I paste below the answer from our R+D Department.
Thanks a lot for your interest in our products and for your question. We can assure you the cabinet is tested and the ports size is 100% correct. If there is any doubt we would appreciate a reason to claim the ports design are “too small”. According to our measurements and listening tests the ports are correct. We hope this information helps.
Kind regards Rebeca Rodríguez Edited by Mel_Gibson - 04 December 2020 at 3:14pm |
|
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Would rectangular ports located at the bottom give me better performance?
|
|
smitske96
Young Croc Joined: 16 February 2016 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1085 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Going for a smaller and triangle port is a compromise on itself. What you get in return is the bracing the port provides, and the easier practical tuning. Same goes for some older B&C S18cn design. Port area is around 122 cm2 and you want something in the sd/2 range. This combined with the triangle layout, you will get bad performance with large signals.
|
|
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
How would you say they're compromised? When I said Youtube I didn't mean people who make designs and upload videos of the designs I mean videos of people who've made subs using designs from B&C, Beyma etc..and then uploaded videos of them testing their subs out. |
|
smitske96
Young Croc Joined: 16 February 2016 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1085 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The Beyma designs are compromised. Its was a choice on their behalf. Going for a different port would be more difficult which then again costs more money.
9/10 times the youtube designs aren't particularly good. Most are really garbage. A good design will cost time (and knowledge), after that you need to test and verifiy which again can take a lot of time. Maybe watch the enclosure design page of B&C for a while, they just put out some new designs and more are coming.
|
|
Mel_Gibson
Registered User Joined: 02 December 2020 Location: Peterborough Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I live in Peterborough sorry i'll put my location on my profile now. I don't mind about ports not being triangular but I just figured Beyma should know what shape and sized ports would work best as they design the enclosures for their own drivers.
I've seen on Youtube people have used Beyma, RCF, B&C etc...drivers to build their own subs and as far as I could see most are bottom rectangular ports. Edited by Mel_Gibson - 03 December 2020 at 1:46pm |
|
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |