Amp Internals 2 |
Post Reply | Page <1 9293949596 260> |
Author | ||
vilsonas
Registered User Joined: 05 May 2013 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Skytec tec6950 Edited by vilsonas - 08 May 2013 at 4:15pm |
||
vilsonas
Registered User Joined: 05 May 2013 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Radeon
Registered User Joined: 22 November 2011 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 277 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
wow pretty god for a skytec .....
|
||
vilsonas
Registered User Joined: 05 May 2013 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Harrison x300 Matrix act 500 |
||
infrasound
Old Croc Joined: 13 May 2011 Location: Brizzle Status: Offline Points: 2276 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Wow, you don't get design engineering more contrasting than that.
I hate to think how much the Harrison would cost to make !!
|
||
Earplug
Old Croc Joined: 03 January 2012 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 7216 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Matrix = KISS amp. |
||
Earplugs Are For Wimps!
|
||
vilsonas
Registered User Joined: 05 May 2013 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Matrix very cheapest amp but all inputs and outputs connector are neutrik :D |
||
Muckerbarnes1
Old Croc Joined: 20 March 2010 Location: Stroud Status: Offline Points: 2654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
ARX SX 3000. Pic from my fone.. ugh!
|
||
Billy Dawg.
|
||
ceharden
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 05 June 2005 Location: Southampton Status: Offline Points: 11776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The Matrix/Harrison comparison isn't entirely fair. Underneath the PCB on the Matrix you will find surface mount circuitry which is all the small signal and driver stages.
There are actually many similiarities between the circuitry on the two amps but the Matrix uses modern manufacturing techniques to fit it into a much smaller space. The Harrison also has several features including (what appears to be) separate rectification and smoothing for the two amp channels. What it shows is how component technology and manufacturing processes has progressed to allow a similar amplifier to be made in a more compact format and less labour intensive manner. |
||
burningbush
Old Croc Joined: 25 May 2009 Location: Pictland Status: Offline Points: 5897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That ARX thing looks a monster!
|
||
music is the message
|
||
Muckerbarnes1
Old Croc Joined: 20 March 2010 Location: Stroud Status: Offline Points: 2654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you Google the ARX SX3000 Gav it is 1K/ch into 4r.
On the bench it was only 940/ch both channels just at onset of clip, so there abouts. Not sure why '3000' though, should be '2000'.
|
||
Billy Dawg.
|
||
jbl_man
Moderator Group Joined: 12 January 2005 Location: London. Status: Offline Points: 11155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have repaired a few of these,has to be one of the worst designs re.actual layout and construction i have seen,at first sight,it looks impressive,as Chris says,dual rectifiers etc,but look at the four little sub boards that mount the output transistors,these sit just above the heatsink base,so the live portion of the underside (the solder ends of the components) is only about 1mm away from shorting the whole lot out...if you look closely at this one,someone has tried to bend the boards slightly upwards to prevent this happening,a bit of rough treatment on the road,or in a rack,and bang when you switch on. |
||
Be seeing you.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 9293949596 260> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |