Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Advanced Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - If Xmax shouldn't be exceeded, why have a Xlim?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

If Xmax shouldn't be exceeded, why have a Xlim?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>
Author
Message
S DeXter View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Location: Moon
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote S DeXter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2011 at 8:16pm
Originally posted by IanD IanD wrote:

Once you exceed the real linear Xmax where the coil starts to leave the gap there's less force so the cone moves less additional distance for each amp of current -- of course this is why the distortion increases.


I am aware of that Ian.

Originally posted by IanD IanD wrote:



It's still not a good idea to drive beyond the rated Xmax if you want decent sound...

Ian



For tops, I have to agree 100%.

For sub, I agree to differ.
Enjoy your self...... It's later than you think.......
Back to Top
greeef View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 25 June 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote greeef Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 January 2011 at 9:36pm
I'm going to throw in my baseless opinion here.

As you drive air harder, it's elasticity and thermal compliance and all the physics stuff becomes relevant. An absolutely perfect pistonal speaker is still going to distort at high volume because it's going to get mounted in a real space, not a theoretical anechoic one, and cos that's the nature of air and ultimately, eardrums.

Yes it's distortion, but it's not hard high order clipping, it bears more similarity to power compression. I'd much rather hear a dynamic system that exceeds xmax on the transients than one that used outboard processing to bring everything below xmax at the same rms level.

EDIT - like above poster, i mean this applies to subs. Sounds rough on top where linearity properly matters.


Edited by greeef - 25 January 2011 at 9:38pm
Back to Top
IanD View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 17 January 2009
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 400
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote IanD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 January 2011 at 8:43pm
Originally posted by greeef greeef wrote:

I'm going to throw in my baseless opinion here.

As you drive air harder, it's elasticity and thermal compliance and all the physics stuff becomes relevant. An absolutely perfect pistonal speaker is still going to distort at high volume because it's going to get mounted in a real space, not a theoretical anechoic one, and cos that's the nature of air and ultimately, eardrums.

Yes it's distortion, but it's not hard high order clipping, it bears more similarity to power compression. I'd much rather hear a dynamic system that exceeds xmax on the transients than one that used outboard processing to bring everything below xmax at the same rms level.

EDIT - like above poster, i mean this applies to subs. Sounds rough on top where linearity properly matters.


Nonlinearity due to air heating/compression is only ever an issue for compression drivers with huge power density in the throat, not in bass horns even at very high levels -- look up the numbers if you don't believe me.
Back to Top
TechnoChef View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 23 April 2009
Location: Oxfordshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TechnoChef Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 February 2011 at 10:38am
From what I understand from all the above, driving a sub past xmax has more of a compression than distortion effect - like an analog tape deck. Obviously within reasonable power levels!
I've produced/written dance music for a good few years now and the best method I've found for making basslines sound Phat (with the capital P!) Is by adding a little soft tube compression. In planning for and designing subs I have always worked within xmax figures but now I think my mind has changed, maybe an extra couple of mm will add some warmth without necessarily destroying equipment???
^^^^all for sub and nowt else though!
I think I'm in love with your mum.
Back to Top
Matthias View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 22 July 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 206
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matthias Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 February 2011 at 11:08am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhYtHH5JdCA

DC - displacement kills a lot of speakers. It depends on the driver, tho. It will be generated when the coil leaves the gap and the cones 0 point will shift
Back to Top
Rotorbar View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 20 May 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 71
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rotorbar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 February 2011 at 7:25am
This all comes down to how much you want to hear distortion and how much equipment you want to cook.  Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment.  You can exceed your xmax at the expense of some driver distortion during the musical transients.  Since they're transients, you can musically get away with considerable driver distortion, so long as the amplifiers don't clip.  That's another kettle of fish.  Eventually, exceeding xmax far enough, for long enough, will rip apart the surround or burn the voice coil, and after a recone job, you will have a new feeling for how much you can exceed those limits.  Since I go entirely with vented bass cabinets, the mechanical limits in that 1/3rd octave above Fb get to me first.  I try to stay in the 6-10dB-down range for running power at the amplifiers.  It seems to be a good trade-off between ruined voice coils and torn surrounds.  As a side note, I have never had a spider fail.  In the mids/tops, I see thermal limits first.  Got another lesson on that recently.  The photo's I see of burned voice coils mostly show that some part of the coil was out of the gap.  Some of them suggest poor reconing techniques, meaning the voice coil wasn't centered magnetically during the recone job.

The nice thing about a large xlim is having the ability to survive some monstrous transient, like when a mike gets dropped or a signal processor gets accidentally turned off.  If the driver can take that transient physical abuse, great.  You made it through another day.
Back to Top
snowflake View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 29 December 2004
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 3118
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote snowflake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 February 2011 at 7:55pm
if you read up an the psycho-acoustics of the missing fundamental this suggests that if the 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion is in the right proportion the distortion will be indistinguishable from the fundamental and make it sound a lot louder. if a driver were designed with this in mind it will have slight asymetry in the suspension or motor field to introduce 2nd order distortion at high excursion and to keep it higher than the 3rd order distortion. as below 200Hz the human ear rapidly loses sensitivity (at 24dB/octave I think) a couple of percent distortion will make the perceived sound twice as loud.

amp clipping will not introduce the right sort of distortion to sound good so generally if you have to choose a big amp overpowering fewer speakers will sound better than a small amp clipping into a greater number of speakers.

other than for subs distortion does sound terrible, especially on human voices
Back to Top
S DeXter View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Location: Moon
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote S DeXter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 February 2011 at 7:12pm
+1 snowflake and rotorbar!

Edited by S DeXter - 15 February 2011 at 7:13pm
Enjoy your self...... It's later than you think.......
Back to Top
cooky1257 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 16 February 2011
Location: Wirral
Status: Offline
Points: 241
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cooky1257 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 February 2011 at 11:59am
There's two halves to a waveform, if the coil is out of the gap on the upstroke then isn't the downstroke dependent on the surround and spider returning the coil to a driven position in time?. The pistonic behaviour is only guaranteed within xmax limits as I understand it. Start approaching xmech and you'll bottom your drivers, quite possibly wrecking them.
Back to Top
S DeXter View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Location: Moon
Status: Offline
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote S DeXter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 February 2011 at 12:45pm
Originally posted by cooky1257 cooky1257 wrote:

There's two halves to a waveform, if the coil is out of the gap on the upstroke then isn't the downstroke dependent on the surround and spider returning the coil to a driven position in time?.


Do you mean there will be an assymetry of motion? The surround and spider are always responsible for driver position, not just out of xmax...?

Originally posted by cooky1257 cooky1257 wrote:

The pistonic behaviour is only guaranteed within xmax limits as I understand it. Start approaching xmech and you'll bottom your drivers, quite possibly wrecking them.


Pistonic behaviour relates to cone breakup modes (cone flexing and resonating) rather than xmax effects . Loudspeaker modellers assume the driver to act like a perfect 'piston' (unless you are using FEA!).

Alot of newer drivers have quite large Xmechs....

Enjoy your self...... It's later than you think.......
Back to Top
cooky1257 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 16 February 2011
Location: Wirral
Status: Offline
Points: 241
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cooky1257 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 February 2011 at 2:57pm
Originally posted by S DeXter S DeXter wrote:

Originally posted by cooky1257 cooky1257 wrote:

There's two halves to a waveform, if the coil is out of the gap on the upstroke then isn't the downstroke dependent on the surround and spider returning the coil to a driven position in time?.


Do you mean there will be an assymetry of motion? The surround and spider are always responsible for driver position, not just out of xmax...?

Originally posted by cooky1257 cooky1257 wrote:

The pistonic behaviour is only guaranteed within xmax limits as I understand it. Start approaching xmech and you'll bottom your drivers, quite possibly wrecking them.


Pistonic behaviour relates to cone breakup modes (cone flexing and resonating) rather than xmax effects . Loudspeaker modellers assume the driver to act like a perfect 'piston' (unless you are using FEA!).

Alot of newer drivers have quite large Xmechs....

 Mr Flemings rule only applies if the coil is in the magnetic field, so yes if hit with a huge sine wave say, it wouldn't be producing that sine wave correctly. 

Of course the surround and spider's job is to position the vc correctly about the 0 position with applied signal creating the +/-'movement', they are not responsible for playing the undriven parts of a tune;-)


Back to Top
snowflake View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 29 December 2004
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 3118
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote snowflake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 March 2011 at 2:31pm
there is also the possibility with horn loaded subs of using the front chamber to roll-off the HF at right frequency to drastically reduce the amount of third harmonic. if the third harmonic is kept to about a third of the level of the second harmonic the distortion will sound a lot more musical. so if the horn has a low cut-off of 40 Hz it will have high excursion around 60Hz. Second harmonics of this will be 120Hz and third will be 180Hz. so if the front chamber can be sized to begin HF roll-off after 120Hz and to be at least 6dB down (in addition to the mass roll-off of the driver) at 180Hz there could be some improvement to the sound. this is all in theory BTW but will try it in my next prototype
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.