EQ Advice! Ashly GQX-3102 or BSS Opal FCS-966 |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
audiomik
Old Croc Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 2962 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 25 December 2011 at 12:36am |
all of this discussion between two specific types of Graphic EQ's and no mention of the classic Klark Teknik DN27's which have proper individual passive filters for each band... these have become something of an industry standard from when they were first available
Mik |
|
Warning! May contain Nuts
plus springs, washers, screws, etc, etc. |
|
SamV
Old Croc Joined: 21 October 2008 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 8711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ah the ADF4k, been after one for a while. I'd like to see how it handles.
The KT stuff is lovely though. And you're right the majority of 2nd hand BSS do have faults but I think that could be down to the sheer number of them about. I do often wonder why the Ashlys were never so mainstream, I wonder if it was original purchase price or lack of marketting. Edited by SamV - 24 December 2011 at 11:30pm |
|
a1dl
Young Croc Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1016 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Haven't used the Ashly, but have several of the BSS units and have always liked them. Broken faders seem to be a common problem with the 966, have seen many like that over the years, although ours don't get dry hired so possibly get treated with more tlc, and all faders & knobs still intact! |
|
http://www.eventpahire.co.uk
|
|
shagnasty
Old Croc Joined: 30 July 2007 Location: Guildford, UK Status: Offline Points: 7685 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have to say for £100 each I'd go Ashley in a second, the lot of 966s I bought were £250 each and all had bust cadets ( apparently comon, but not to me) so the Ashley is a much better deal, cost aside, DN410, adf4000 or if you really don't understand EQ and want it clumsy, a DN 360, but TBH graphs are dead, para every tone for me!!!
|
|
SamV
Old Croc Joined: 21 October 2008 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 8711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've used upto -12db at 3.15k in a stone church once. Sorted it right out.
|
|
shagnasty
Old Croc Joined: 30 July 2007 Location: Guildford, UK Status: Offline Points: 7685 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Do you have kit that sounds so bad it needs -16dB?? on a graphic that is gonna punch a MASSIVE hole in your frequency response, prob better using a para on the LMS or inserting a dn-410...
|
|
mk2_ginger_biscuit69
Old Croc Joined: 03 November 2008 Location: Brighton Status: Offline Points: 7801 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
theres got to be something SERIOUSLY wrong to need -16db on an EQ... i EQ in the +-6db range when i can and thats still plenty |
|
''Remember that the object of a subwoofer is to enhance the output of your main speakers, not overpower it''
''Dubstep - an elongated electronic fart'' |
|
philw44
Registered User Joined: 27 December 2009 Status: Offline Points: 496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I liked the 966, thought it had a pleasing colouration to the sound too.
I preferred it as a FOH EQ for sculpting rather than cutting notches on wedges. Edited by philw44 - 24 December 2011 at 1:04pm |
|
OllieMan
Registered User Joined: 02 March 2006 Location: Midlands, UK. Status: Offline Points: 992 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I love the Ashleys!
The have up to 16db of gain reduction, do the BSS do this much? Genuine units are easy to find, you just by from the US! |
|
DOJO MEDIA.
PA HIRE/ RECORDING STUDIOS/ BACKLINE HIRE. |
|
spiffing
Young Croc Joined: 17 August 2006 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 634 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
i've never used ashley (or heard of) but i'd consider the BSS 960 as well as the 966 maybe you should dry hire some in to see what you prefere
Cheers
|
|
Robbo
Old Croc Joined: 05 December 2005 Location: Shropshire Status: Offline Points: 4226 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You have to be very carefull at the moment buying Ashley gear as it is one of the ranges of gear that the Chinese have decided to clone---Lots of it about but very few genuine--bit like the Shure SM58 cloning problem---They are made to look the same in all respects but they certainly do not sound the same.
|
|
SamV
Old Croc Joined: 21 October 2008 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 8711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I picked up all my Ashleys for about £100 each! That said I've had the opposite results, the Ashleys seem to sound better than the Opals when you move more than a few faders. Other than that I've not noticed any differences. Occasionally I do get engineers asking for the BSS when I've taken the Ashlys out but most soon accept them when they use them. They just need reassuring that they're just as good/better. It's weird how they just accept the speakers though knowing their our own design.
As for not really using eqs, how do you eq for a venue then? Our system in a good room is fairly flat. Edited by SamV - 24 December 2011 at 4:31am |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |