Behringer inuke NU6000 vs KAM KXD7200 bench tested |
Post Reply | Page <12345 12> |
Author | |||||||
teslaman
Registered User Joined: 11 June 2009 Location: Huntingdon Status: Offline Points: 302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
As far as the current draw goes its not going to be any worse than any other amplifier that doesn't have PFC built in, and that includes virtually all of the heavyweight units and a lot of the switch mode supply ones too. With no PFC they all use rectification into a set of capacitors which will always pull peaky currents. Hence I wouldn't be worried, it's not a case that the Behringer is poor, more that the Kam is Good! For domestic appliances the rules are changing such that anything above a certain power needs PFC but for "professional applications" it's not mandatory, hence multi-kW amplifiers with no PFC. I have amps from QSC, Void, Matrix and Ohm and none of them have PFC so will all draw peaky current from the mains....... As for the sustained output, I may re-visit that and see if it does eventually limit the power or not but as I've shown, for music signals it should be just fine.
U.Viktor I've noticed that you have a very black or white view of things! I agree that pulling hot air across the capacitors is a bad idea and they are only 85 degree rated types too. The generally accepted rule of thumb is that if the rated life of the capacitor is, for example, 2000 hours at 85 degrees then the life will double for every 10 degree reduction in temperature. Ultimately it's going to depend on what temperature they run at but thanks to the efficiency of the amp and taking account of the nature of music signals I doubt they will run that hot. I'll take a guess (for the sake of calculating a number) at 65 degrees in which case life might be 8000 hours which is the equivalent of 333 days of continuous running or 1000 days at 8 hours a day. Lets remember this amp is targeted at musicians, DJ's etc. and not touring companies! I suspect their usage might be a few hours a week in which case I don't think they have much to worry about, do you? With regard to the iNuke, the IRS20957S is hardly entry level, it is used in some reference designs which have extremely good audio performance, I know because I've tested them! Yes, the typical application circuit is a self-oscillating second order delta-sigma type modulator but it happens to work quite well. You can of course use it differently if you wish, it's up to the designer. It can also be synchronised to an external clock if needed but not over it's entire PWM modulation range. If you wanted you could turn it into a UcD type circuit with feedback from after the output filter, maybe that would appeal more to you? The voltage doubler arrangement for 115V supplies is, I agree, a bit (no, a LOT) of a tall order! I can only assume they don't use a 10A IEC socket for the US market, otherwise it's going to be very limited in power before that 12A breaker goes! Stick to 230V I think...
During those particular test yes it is but I'm not saying that's the best the amplifier can do, that's just the result of the 33% test signal I used to represent worse case audio abuse. As I stated I think the Behringer will probably do about 1~1.2kW per channel continuous sine wave, limited by its 12A circuit breaker. For music it will happily produce 2kW into 4 Ohms per channel. The Kam can only do 650W into 4 Ohms continuous sine wave but its happy to deliver 1.6kW under music conditions. Should be absolutely fine for most people...
Hi Mik, I think the traces I put up for the limiter operation will give you some idea of the output under just clipping conditions since the limiter holds the output at the just clipping point. If you'd like to see some more detail i can use a phosphor scope and zoom in to see it properly The current probe I use is a Honeywell CSNR161, DC-150kHz with 0.5% accuracy, it's nice little device I have a 0.65mH inductor here that will take 50A plus (an air cored beast from an old UPS) so I could use that but I don't have anything around 2mH. I don't suppose it would matter much, I could just change the test frequency to get the phase shift needed. I would expect the class-D to be very good with inductive loads (and capacitive ones) owing to its 4-quadrant operation. If I get the time i'll try something, what conditions would you suggest?
Edited by teslaman - 24 July 2012 at 6:56pm |
|||||||
teslaman
Registered User Joined: 11 June 2009 Location: Huntingdon Status: Offline Points: 302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
As already mentioned there are a lot of products out there just as bad, why would this one be any worse? I doubt that a flatted-top sine wave caused by this kind of load would cause any harm to other equipment, why would it?
Yes, I think it does and for the "weekend warriors" like myself £270 gets you a powerful, efficient bass amp! Since it's not bad run full range either then it could get you out a tight spot if your mid-top amp went down too but I'd stick with class-AB for that myself I think.
Whether 1% THD is OK or not depends very much on what the spectrum of it is. 1% of low-order (2nd, 3rd, 5th harmonic) is normally fine but if it was huge amounts of 9th, 11th, 13th, etc. then it would sound horrible, especially as a mid-top amp. The iNuke does have "real" feedback, its whole topology depends upon it to function, but I guess you mean it's taken before the output L-C filter. I don't agree that's always a big problem, the DCR of the inductor is likely 20-30 mOhms and the output impedance of the closed-loop power stage will be very low, especially at low frequencies. The output impedance of the amp is therefore going to be very low until the highest audio frequencies and so it doesn't matter what the load impedance swings are like they will not significantly affect the response of the amp. To calculate a number let assume the output impedance of the amp is bad, say 100 mOhms. If the load impedance went from 2 Ohm to 1000 Ohms then the output level would vary by just 0.21dB, I wouldn't say that's a disaster! The resistance of the speaker cable is likely to be far more significant so the amp is pretty blame-free all of a sudden.... On the Kam PFC inductor I would entirely agree it looks a bit weedy and badly constructed, I would at least expect it to be dipped in varnish to stop the windings vibrating.
If there are any "interesting" amps out there that people want testing then I will consider it. The only problem is time as I don't have much and it takes quite a while to do all this stuff. The reason I was keen with the iNuke and Kam is because they are cheap and yet promise great power, if they lived up to their names then they are game changers for the weekend warrior types like myself. As it is I think they are good for bass, especially at 8 Ohms per channel, and not too bad for full-range or mid-top use though I would still prefer a class-AB in this role.
Yes sorry for that, I'll re-read and make it clearer. My listening tests were a bit flawed due to the venue but I may still give an opinion, maybe
Already covered the current thing but can you elaborate on your disappointment with the linearity. I guess you mean the THD? I didn't think it was too bad but certainly no decent class-AB! The energy figures I used included the primary side capacitor storage as that is very relevant for switch-mode supplies, that energy is just as accessible from the secondary side as from the secondary caps directly. Yes there are some small losses in the transformer and switching devices but that energy is still available to the amp. How it compares to a 4kW class-AB is a relevant point but I dont really have one I can take figures from. If it were to have say 40,000uF per rail and a rail voltage of 150V then the class-AB would have an energy storage of 900J. From that perspective the Class-D's are a bit lightweight and hence cannot generate the same power at 31Hz as they can at 1kHz. They're not disastrous by any means though.
Ultimately for the period of time between refreshes (100Hz for our 50Hz mains) its the energy stored that will be used to fill the gaps. A smaller stored energy will lead to a faster lowering of voltage, or more ripple, hence the two are related. Its just easier for people to comprehend I thought, ripple is of no concern to the end user, just the available undistorted output power. EDIT for spelling
Edited by teslaman - 25 July 2012 at 9:23am |
|||||||
audiomik
Old Croc Joined: 06 April 2010 Location: Bath, UK Status: Offline Points: 2962 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
David
thanks for your replies Re: "he current probe I use is a Honeywell CSNR161, DC-150kHz with 0.5% accuracy, it's nice little device Firstly your current probe may struggle with it's bandwidth limit to really see what's happening to the current output with an Inductive component in the load. Do you have a differential input Analog 'scope with a 'third' input such as simultaneous trig view or better still 4 Channel? If so, then use the differential input to look at the current by using a low value non-inductive power resistor (a number of 2 Watt metal film type in parallel for approx 0.1R) and the third/fourth inputs to look at the Amplifier Output Voltage and act as a sync source. Your 0.65mH should be fine, try 2kHz input signal to start with when you have 4 Ohms resistive in series.... it still gets nearer than purely resistive to simulate a 'real driver'. You won't need high output levels to see what's happening and an FFT/Spectral analysis of the Current waveform at different Amplifier Output Voltages if you can do that will be interesting keep up the good work! Mik |
|||||||
Warning! May contain Nuts
plus springs, washers, screws, etc, etc. |
|||||||
simonh
Old Croc Joined: 07 November 2010 Location: Essex Status: Offline Points: 1773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Have to agree with spongebob Dave and thank you for taking the time out to carry out such a detailed analysis. Now I must confess it's way over my head but it's clear to see that's it useful and beneficial to the guy's in the know. Cheers S.
|
|||||||
Nick Sasquash
Young Croc Joined: 24 June 2006 Location: North West UK Status: Offline Points: 1408 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Telslaman.... quality work, keep the amp tests coming
|
|||||||
https://operationsoundsystemrecords.bandcamp.com/
https://www.facebook.com/OperationSoundSystem/ |
|||||||
vibez
Registered User Joined: 21 January 2010 Location: wolverhampton Status: Offline Points: 316 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Having read this thread yesterday i decided to try my inuke (that usually run monitors ) on sub just for the fun ofit. I must confess that i was quite suprised by the result. i hung two 1850 loaded scoops off each channel and this little budget amp spanked them pretty well. I must admit that i wouldn't feel absolutely comfortable using this on sub long term but for emergency situations i wouldn't hesitate to use this to get me out of trouble. The only thing i did notice was that when it hit clip level the limiting was very audible but once limiter on dcx was set to prevent this it sounded pretty good and certainly delivered more bang per buck than i have ever heard from an amp in this price range. Haven't tried the dsp yet but will have a play at the weekend when i have more time.
Top review and suprisingly good budget amp |
|||||||
MessyM2k8
Young Croc Joined: 29 October 2008 Location: Norwich Status: Offline Points: 690 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Nice report.
Out of interest, what test gear are you using? |
|||||||
VentureSound
Young Croc Joined: 18 October 2009 Location: London N20 Status: Offline Points: 950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Teslaman, thanks for all your tests, it was a very interesting read indeed. I would be keen to see some similar results on a Peavey IPR series, as I guess they are somewhat comparable being class D, 'new generation' and cheap.
I've heard an IPR on subs and was suprised as well, sounded pretty good to me! Cannot remember the model, but it was one of the lower ones like 1-2KW. Edited by VentureSound - 26 July 2012 at 12:24am |
|||||||
mini-mad
Old Croc Joined: 13 July 2012 Location: london Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
i think what you have done is superb.
as suggested a few more "compare-the-power-amp.com"s would be very welcome by one and all. you are a true soldier to the cause and i wish to thank you for all your hard work and the right up has been a damn good read.... gotta love those thermal pics too!! keep up the good work and we all thank you for your time.
|
|||||||
bitSmasher
Old Croc Joined: 23 June 2012 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 2295 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Timebomb
Old Croc Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2717 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Id be interested to read that if you've got a link BitSmasher?
I would be very keen to see measurements of the Peavey IPR and the Crest Prolite, it seems only the smaller 2 models are available though, the larger ones have been forthcoming for several years now, and in the UK we haven't even got the IPR3000 yet i dont think. They are defiantly on the short list for budget lightweights though. |
|||||||
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
|||||||
MessyM2k8
Young Croc Joined: 29 October 2008 Location: Norwich Status: Offline Points: 690 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Peavey IPR 1600 Tested here |
|||||||
Post Reply | Page <12345 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |