Driver choice reasoning |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
CMS
Registered User Joined: 31 October 2013 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 25 November 2013 at 5:22pm |
|
Hey yall, dunno if im placing this in the wrong section as im fairly "unadvanced" :)
None the less, il give it a go. I've been looking at a pair of 8" drivers to sit below the BMS 4592Nd For the purpose of this question i'l restrict the drivers layed out to: From what i can see and with my limited capability interpret by the data, my reasoning would tell me that the 8N519 has all the pro's and no con's going for it.. Most linear FR, Lower Fs, Higher Xmax, More power handling Do neodymium magnets not in general have smaller voicecoil gaps and therefore lower distortion factors, than with a larger more resonant gap? Carbon fibre (Kevlar?) diaphragm which i've been told in "public" opinion seems to exceed the audiophile performance of paper cones? With all this in mind, disregarding prices (which obviously makes the 8S215 desirable) is the slightly higher moving mass and the slightly lower sens in the 8N519 that unwanted, as to make the 8N515 better despite the immediate visual inferiority? I did notice the differences in distortion's however is that what might wheigh heavy on the choice? Is this a question of me over / wrongly analysing measurements compared to real life tonal qualities, or where are we at here?.. If anyone could possibly help me, id much appreciate it :D
PS. Why would BMS go about measuring the 8N515 in 10L compared to the 25L of the other two, or are we just talking typo? |
||
corell
Young Croc Joined: 19 August 2013 Location: Berlin Status: Offline Points: 1161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
nobody will dare to say something before tony does i think :D
just two thoughts: if you rate a light cone/low moving mass and a high sensitivity as a pro, then you should not look for a low fs. these things are contrary. for your needs (as far as i understood it in your other thread) you are not interested in a low fs at all, because imo there is no advantage of it if not used as a sub. And how about getting all 3 and testing them, then keep the one you like most? nothing can compensate your personal preference when hearing them ... note that i have not heard any of them so far. |
||
CMS
Registered User Joined: 31 October 2013 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I might be spending a fair bit on this project, but i aint no Arabian oil khalif :D
|
||
Mikkel
Young Croc Joined: 17 May 2013 Location: Huddersfield Status: Offline Points: 549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
[/QUOTE]
I might be spending a fair bit on this project, but i aint no Arabian oil khalif :D [/QUOTE]
|
||
corell
Young Croc Joined: 19 August 2013 Location: Berlin Status: Offline Points: 1161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
there are a lot of shops where you can buy, test it and send back free.
|
||
Meat
Old Croc Joined: 05 June 2009 Location: Manc Status: Offline Points: 1514 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
8s are a waste of that comp. You need to be using something bigger (I'd reckon 12 or 15) before its paying its way.
|
||
Don't test the champignon sound
|
||
bass*en*mass
Old Croc Joined: 03 September 2009 Location: "unknown" Status: Offline Points: 4009 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
exactly what i was going to say..
"almost any" 1" could meet a 8" perfectly, no need to spend the cash and get one of the best coax comps just to use such a small driver for lowmids.. |
||
CMS
Registered User Joined: 31 October 2013 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Maybe i should have added that this does not present the whole system... Its a part of a larger 4-way application in which (so far theoreticly) the low end is handled by 4x12"... The question was put mainly to get a grasp on what the topic states too, the reasoning for choosing drivers compared to the data presented without having actually heard it...
Edit: Thank you for your input tho.. Edited by CMS - 25 November 2013 at 10:38pm |
||
Tony Wilkes
Old Croc Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you go back to the original thread you will see that the OP wanted Hi-Fi sound. To that end I suggested he used a particular Bass driver which I then could see he had already considered.
Now for the Mids to have a real sense of Hi-Fi I would nearly always prefer an 8" to most 10" & 12" drivers. I know what 2 x the above mentions 8" jobbies mentioned will do and a pair of them will work very well with the bass drivers to allow a 150hz(ish) X-over to the bass. I would then cross the 4592 around 900hz. I agree that the 4592 is capable of more but look at the loads of folks that use them for home hi-fi, hundreds in the States :) Tony p.s. OP use the 8S215:) |
||
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
||
corell
Young Croc Joined: 19 August 2013 Location: Berlin Status: Offline Points: 1161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Most of them cross it at ~400Hz to something like a Klipsch La Scala or similar o.O |
||
Tony Wilkes
Old Croc Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That is because they are often used solely with a 15" bass driver. IMHO they will work better for the OP with the 8's |
||
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |