![]() |
18sound in Horn 186 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
dj.elvis
New Member
Joined: 19 April 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: 18sound in Horn 186Posted: 19 April 2010 at 11:59pm |
|
Hello,
I have some question for members. I have two horns 186 and i have problem with drivers. Which Driver is better for this horn: 18sound 18LW1250 or Eminence Omega Pro 18? Please for Answer Thanx alot.. Piter |
|
![]() |
|
noislinger
Registered User
Joined: 01 March 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 147 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 April 2010 at 11:24am |
|
18lw1250
Fs 35 Hz Re 5 Ohm Sd 0,1134 sq.mt. (175,7 sq.in.) Qms 8 Qes 0,28 Qts 0,27 Vas 268 lt. (9,47 cuft) Mms 142 gr. (0,31 lb) BL 23,6 Tm Linear Mathematical Xmax (7) ± 9 mm (±0,35 in) Le (1kHz) 2,73 mH Ref. Efficiency 1W@1m (half space) 98 dB pd186 Fs 27 Hz Xmax 9 mm Revc 5.5 Ohms Vd 1.035 10-4 m3 Qts 0.312 No 2.05% Qms 7.75 Pmx 700 Watts Qes 0.326 Cms 188 µM/N Vas 353 Litres Mms 184 grams Sd 1150 sq cm BL 22.94 T/m omegapro18 Resonant Frequency (fs) 25hz DC Resistance (Re) 5.20 Coil Inductance (Le) 1.67mh Mechanical Q (Qms) 8.81 Electromagnetic Q (Qes) 0.32 Total Q (Qts) 0.31 Compliance Equivalent Volume (Vas) 548.7 ltr/19.4 cu. ft. Peak Diaphragm Displacement Volume (Vd) 556cc Mechanical Compliance of Suspension (Cms) 0.29mm/N BL Product (BL) 18.8 T-M Diaphragm Mass inc. Airload (Mms) 138 grams Efficiency Bandwidth Product (EBP) 79 Maximum Linear Excursion (Xmax) 4.8 Surface Area of Cone (Sd) 1159 cm2 Maximum Mechanical Limit (Xlim) 16mm Qts and Vas determine box volume. For the flattest frequency response in a closed box, Q = 0.7. For less low extension and a boost in remaining low response, the box should be made smaller and Q > 0.7. For a lower extension but a loss in existing low response, the box should be made larger an Q < 0.7. for a sealed box a qts of 0.38 will require a box volume = Vas to produce a -3db low-cut at fs (theoretically). Q = 0.7 for a sealed box a qts of 0.2 will require a box volume well below Vas to produce a -3db low-cut well above fs. Q = 0.7 for a sealed box a qts of 0.5 will require a box volume well above Vas to produce a -3db low-cut well below fs. Q = 0.7 you can see that the 18sound has a lower Qts and a lower Vas than the 186. so it would prefer a smaller rear chamber. the eminence has a similar qts (0.31:0.3) but has a much larger Vas (556:353) so would prefer a larger chamber. the eminence has a low fz but a weak xmax (cannot move much air) so is likely to have a worse bass response than the 186. the 18sound would be better off in the 1850horn. out of the two id go for the omega pro in the 186, unless you can affors the pd. lower qts drivers have stronger motors and are in my opinion better. |
|
![]() |
|
breakdabeat pete
Young Croc
Joined: 10 March 2008 Location: norwich Status: Offline Points: 758 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 April 2010 at 4:43pm |
|
id rather stick the 18sound in a 186 horn than eminence any day!
|
|
|
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
|
|
![]() |
|
ceharden
The 10,000 Points Club
Joined: 05 June 2005 Location: Southampton Status: Offline Points: 11851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 April 2010 at 6:02pm |
|
The 18LW1400 has been used in the 186 horn to good effect.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |