Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Electro Frying Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - dbx rack360...opinion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

dbx rack360...opinion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
levyte357- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 27 July 2012
Location: UK, South East
Status: Offline
Points: 8128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote levyte357- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 October 2016 at 3:04pm
Originally posted by shagnasty shagnasty wrote:

The sad truth is the DCX is 90% product and 10% brand name, DBX is 90% brand name and 10% product, if you want a real improvement on a DCX then you are looking BSS or XTA sized money, people think a DBX is better because of the brand and the fact it cost more, but in truth it is just blind snobery.

No one on here is going to say a DCX is a good a 4 series XTA, but no one in their right mind would say a the XTA is 10x better than the DCX, you have just spent a lot of money to get a bit better..

A DBX on the other hand is a definite down grade, awful interface, silly feature set and IMHO a vague sound..


Aye.

Proven it for myself.. Had Berry for years, then BSS 388, dbx 360 for 48hours, now much happier with DBMark.

DBMark has slightly better sound quality than Berry, but 4I/8O channels settled it.

But as previously said, you'd need to spend XTA/Klark "dollah", for effective improvement on that.
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.
Back to Top
_Natty_ View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 01 April 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 663
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote _Natty_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 November 2016 at 9:26am
xta dp226
sound like a good update option?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.