![]() |
Midrange compression driver development |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 5> |
| Author | |||
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 April 2024 at 4:02pm |
||
Thanks for the input, Elliot :) Its true that 4-5kHz is still a bit rough. But as one can see from the modal analysis of the compression chamber, most of it is probably just the second resonant mode <- So the same problem as in the 2,5kHz range. But i think i would be happy if there was some destructive interference around 5kHz in the final build. The FR and Impedance of the 6nsm51 shows severe cone breakup at that frequency and it would be nice to filter that out acoustically. Regarding the dispersion: I am more than happy with my construction. I just mentioned it as a reason for the reduced hf-output <- it will need the typical constant directivity eq correction when it is finished.
Could you explain why that should help me? I simulated and build quite a lot of prototypes before this and most had a plug reaching inside the horn. But to my knowledge this is only needed if the circumference of the horn-throat is too big for the desired hf-dispersion, or when the wavefront at the throat is not shaped in the desired way <- so the extended part of the plug acts more like a waveguide.
No worries! I totally understand why you thought that....its because i never mentioned that there is a 3D-printed throat-adapter on the horn. The exit of my Compression Driver is 80mm wide and the throat of the horn is 96mm wide. So i printed a conical adapter from 80 to 96mm with a length of 12mm. So just from the information that i gave you it is clear that you interpreted the pictures in that way....there is just too much 3D-print visible at the horn throat :D ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc
Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2024 at 3:08am |
||
So I would imagine you are planning to use a compression driver to fill in the gap (4 kHz - 5 kHz) housed on a 60 x 40 horn to keep things uniform (seamless)? Best Regards,
|
|||
|
Elliot Thompson
|
|||
![]() |
|||
snowflake
Old Croc
Joined: 29 December 2004 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 3443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2024 at 10:33am |
||
|
why have you chosen the crossover point to be 3.5kHz? plenty of 1" compression drivers can be crossed at 1.5kHz or 2khz...
|
|||
![]() |
|||
smoore
Young Croc
Joined: 30 March 2011 Location: N.Devon Status: Offline Points: 966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2024 at 11:38am |
||
|
Hi Julian,
Great to see someone doing some proper R&D! Well done for taking the step! I just wondered, have you got any pictures of your measurement set up and how you have analysed the data? The measurements of your driver on it's own are making me suspicious and you may be measuring reflections rather than your horn, and compression/phase bung. Both look great by the way! Cheers, Sam
|
|||
![]() |
|||
RoadRunnersDust
Young Croc
Joined: 03 December 2013 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 617 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2024 at 12:32pm |
||
Have you missed the point of nearly all professional mid-range solutions for the past 40 years?
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MarjanM
Old Croc
Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2024 at 1:26pm |
||
^^^^^THIS!!!^^^^^
|
|||
|
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
|||
![]() |
|||
fudge22
Registered User
Joined: 26 July 2022 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 April 2024 at 7:53pm |
||
|
Whilst I agree that a smooth transition between the “compression driver” exit, and the horn throat is essential, JulianDA, the OP, has clarified that this is the case. Given that there are no discontinuities, some explanation of why extending the central part of the plug is beneficial would be useful. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Teunos
Old Croc
Joined: 23 November 2008 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1832 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 April 2024 at 12:52pm |
||
|
The project looks great, kudos for the work done.
I agree with TimeBomb and Marjan, extend the plug further into the throat. You write the throat is 80mm 50cm^2, consider that a standing wave in the throat would have its first null at ~2140Hz, which ligns up almost exactly with the first measured null. In the simulation, did you do a full BEM analysis of waveguide including horn?
Edited by Teunos - 28 April 2024 at 12:53pm |
|||
|
Best regards,
Teun. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Timebomb
Old Croc
Joined: 11 October 2004 Location: Lancaster Status: Offline Points: 2761 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 April 2024 at 9:10pm |
||
|
Its hard to tell from the photos but is the expansion rate smooth from the end of the phase plug smooth into to the throat of the horn? The geometry is quite different as you change from radial slits to the flat side walls of the horn, if the plug was extended the reflections across the throat would be reduced and diffused by the round plug.
Did you aim for a curved wavefront or planar at the exit of the phase plug?
|
|||
|
James Secker facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk www.soundgear.co.uk |
|||
![]() |
|||
JulianDA
Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2018 Location: Soest, Germany Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 April 2024 at 11:46pm |
||
|
Thanks for all the replies! They sparked more thoughts on the matter for sure! In a few days i will post more pictures of the complete CAD model of the driver, the phaseplug and the horn. Hopefully this will clear thinks up a bit. After many suggestions of, in my eyes, knowledgeable persons to expand the centre of the plug, this will probably be my next try in getting a flatter FR. But first i will try the new plugs with slightly different channel entry positions. This test will probably be done tomorrow, so i can update you on that in a few days, too.
Thanks :) Yes, a standing wave at 80mm would have a null at that frequency. That could be a possibility. But i have to ask why there should be a standing wave there and not at all other parts of the horn with different dimensions? Would it just be because of the miniscule part of the throat were the outer walls change from a negative to a positive expansion and create a zero expansion segment by diong that? Would the only effect of the plug-extension be then to block the path for this particular standing wave until the outer walls of the horn start to expand? Lots of questions, but i am excited to learn more! For the simulation: i did a full bem analysis in AKABAK of the membrane (with the shape as close to the real one as a pair of calipers and some tricky measuring could get me) driving the compression-chamber (just the shape of the membrane and surrounds shifted by 2mm to the front) then the phaseplug (with interfaces at each end) connected to a model of the horn in use, which is then coupled to the outside via another interface. All that in 4pi with 180° polar measuring points at 1,5m distance. I did some pre-meshing of my models in gmsh and remeshed certain parts again in AKABAK if they needed a finer mesh as indicated by the standard deviations calculated by the solver. I didn't use the model of the horn in the simulations for the initial design of the phase plug. For that i used a model of a plane wave tube (with a 100% absorbant boundary at one end) and later a conical horn shape with the same boundary at the end. <- this was just to get a more accurate look at the achievable FR. But after my phase plug was designed, i simulated it with the horn that i had from previous tests. <- just as with hf compression drivers, the horn shouldnt be critical for the performance as long as there is no large impedance missmatch at the throat |
|||
![]() |
|||
snowflake
Old Croc
Joined: 29 December 2004 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 3443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 April 2024 at 12:14am |
||
there's several reasons you might do it - I just wondered what the thinking is in this design. thanks for your insightful reply
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Earplug
Old Croc
Joined: 03 January 2012 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 7752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 April 2024 at 10:43am |
||
|
An interesting project - but really shows that the physics is difficult and simulations obviously have some severe limitations. Measurement and experimentation is the way - but also, in the end, using a decent DSP unit with several parametric corrections may be the only solution. And generally, the simplest. You can really drive yourself mad trying to tweak and tweak and tweak. Ultimately a bit of a waste of time. There has to be a point where you say enough is enough, and just use some electronics to get the thing sounding good. All the big manufacturers do that, even going back decades. I just picked up some EV S200's that a friend found while clearing out his shed! I really love those cabs, but they also need their processor to really sound good. |
|||
|
Earplugs Are For Wimps!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 5> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |