Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Plans > New Projects Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - My Sub-Low Reflex Project
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

My Sub-Low Reflex Project

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 1:12pm
The construction of this cabinet will follow the same principals as my Double Eighteens:

Having the proper height to stack my tops

Solidly built to handle elements of the world

Holding 250 – 400 pounds without the slightest bit of strain, all courtesy of my tops.

Moving from 18 to 21-inch drivers, the thickness of the baffle board must be increased. This is due to the weight of the drivers (40 pounds each) and of course the diameter difference amongst the two. So, I’m going to use a 54 mm baffle board (Three 18 mm sheets of wood glued/screwed together) instead of the standard 38 mm for my Double Eighteens. The sidewalls will however remain at 18 mm in addition to the top and bottom. I am still debating to use either 18 mm or 38 mm for the rear wall based on the amount of abuse it will endure once the drives excursion begins.

With my Double Eighteens being 13 years old with not a rattle, I will use the same 2 by 4 bracing scheme I did for the my Double Eighteens on the Double Twenty-Ones. The front to rear brace may be increased to 4 by 4.

My Double Eighteens were designed using the screw and silicone method. Each cabinet was constructed using one box of drywall screws and one tube of GE silicone. The Double Twenty-Ones will use two boxes of drywall screws and, two tubes of GE silicone due to the increase in size.

As you can see weight, is the furthest thing from my mind. I don’t fancy lightweight boxes when it comes to subs. The only benefit I ever saw using lightweight subs is ease to move about.

When producing lower notes (40 Hz – down) you need a cabinet that can withstand the air pressure build up from the driver’s excursion without vibrating itself to the point of moving. Since I am aiming for Sub-Low frequencies a heavier box is needed for a better performance.

I am still torn between going the Double Twenty-One route or Single Twenty One enclosures. The overall depth makes it more troublesome to move about in and out of venues. I will need to further investigate designing one over the other.
Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
mobiele eenheid View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 15 August 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mobiele eenheid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 2:02pm
Quote I am still debating to use either 18 mm or 38 mm for the rear wall based on the amount of abuse it will endure once the drives excursion begins
If weight is not an restriction and you're doubting between two different constructions, there is only one rule of thumb imho; Use the strongest.
 
Regards Johan
Back to Top
biotec View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 07 June 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2932
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote biotec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 2:52pm
Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:

So, I’m going to use a 54 mm baffle board (Three 18 mm sheets of wood glued/screwed together) instead of the standard 38 mm for my Double Eighteens.
 
Surely this is not necessary?
 
Intuition tells me that 36mm is more than enough, even for a double 21inch box. I would be more inclined to brace the baffle board more thoroughly rather than resorting to 54mm wood.
me so horny, me love you long throw.
Back to Top
H... View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 21 July 2008
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1164
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote H... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:05pm
What are you gonna call the cab ?
The back breaker?
I'd go for a single 21" with the cab construction you are talking about.
Back to Top
wafflesomd View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 21 September 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 811
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wafflesomd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 5:16pm
Could always try a 21" scoop :)

That would go pretty damn low.

What about something like the TSW-721

Edited by wafflesomd - 15 September 2008 at 5:16pm
Back to Top
sKs01 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 11 April 2008
Location: sheffield
Status: Offline
Points: 1744
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sKs01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 6:50pm
^ not massively, ever had a look at th response plot of a scoop, aside from the hog theyre only really useful down to 40Hz or their abouts, elliot thanks for the very in depth laying out of your selection process, if you have in mind that level of bracing/construction, unless you have some verry well paid roadies i would definatley suggest singles, i wouldnt be happy lifting one of those up stairs with any amount of people to help personaly. too damn heavy bulky and aquard just my 2p, looking forward to some pics of this Thumbs%20Up
You're a big man, but you're in bad shape. With me it's a full time job. Now behave yourself.
Back to Top
csg View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 17 September 2007
Location: bedford
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote csg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 7:00pm
both a 21" scoop and the tsw721 will struggle much below 35Hz. Reflex loading is predictable, scalable and sounds good on any musical style
 
 
Back to Top
rich_gale View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 18 February 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2697
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rich_gale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 7:19pm
christ! 54mm baffle.  id rather do the whole cab in 24mm and brace accordingly. in a dropping situation those 21's are gonna buckle/break before any damage is done to a 24mm baffle board imo. 
 
with drywall/plasterboard screws i find the thread too sharp and spacing to be too wide meaning they can sometimes overturn in the pilothole when tightening and you loose your grip/material in the pilot hole..   


Edited by rich_gale - 15 September 2008 at 7:24pm
Back to Top
wafflesomd View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 21 September 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 811
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wafflesomd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 7:34pm
Is there a genre that needs below 30hrtz extension? Organ music maybe?
Back to Top
csg View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 17 September 2007
Location: bedford
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote csg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 7:48pm
i would not advise the use of drywall screws - they are made from a very hard but britle steel which is SPAX screws are available in the US try them - they are the best available this side of the pond
 
having built some 21" b&c loaded reflex subs myself this year using 25mm birch ply i can tell you that with the correct bracing, pannel losses are very low indeed.
Back to Top
csg View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 17 September 2007
Location: bedford
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote csg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 September 2008 at 7:51pm
extention below 35hz is a debatable subject. whilst the -3db point of my larger rig is 27hz, i often use a hpf of 36hz as below this little is added to the music, but a lot of power is wasted. for d&b and dubstep only do i run to 27
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 September 2008 at 12:51am


Thanks for the input.

I’ve been visiting sound system forums for around 10 years and within that time period I’ve rarely if any I’ve talked about my sound system.

I own two systems. The larger one consists of Twelve Double Eighteens having two cabinets sitting on one Crown MA 5000. The Dual Twenty-One or Single Twenty-One will be added to this system and, get another 5000. If they perform as expected I will build more and buy more Crown 5000s.

I have no use for Scoops, which I got rid of in the summer of 1995 due to having one Double Fifteen cabinet out shine two Scoops (out of a quantity of 10) from 50 Hertz – Down. My Double Eighteens go much lower than my Double Fifteens (Which I own 8 boxes and provides bass for my smaller system). The whole concept of this design is to exceed the Double Eighteens low-end response and maintain the same SPL or 1 dB less during the process.

The last thing I need is bass. This is evident by having five 18-inch drivers sitting in cartons for over five years and, four W bins sitting in the basement (Loaded with 18 inch drivers) that haven’t been used since 2004.

I am in no way gloating on what I have. I am merely letting everyone know where I stand with subs at the moment.

I’ve used drywall screws, silicone and, glue (very little if any) to build all my subs. The only boxes I’ve encountered losing their strength throughout the years are the ones I never put together myself (Purchased from a store). Please keep in mind that the box will be completely (Skeleton) framed with 2 (inch thick) by 4 (inch thick) bracing. So all the panels are attached to the brace. This is the concept behind my Double Eighteens and, with 13 years of moving them about with no signs of weakening it’s proven reliability that I cannot overlook.

The thickness of the baffle board will either be 36 mm or 58 mm pending if I go for a single 21 or two 21’s in one cabinet. I prefer having 58 mm wood holding 80 pounds (Two Beyma 21 L50s) of speaker than, 24 mm.

I know my method to many may look as overkill but, that is the whole idea of building it your self. You design the box to meet your requirements.


rich gale
The only way I can see drywalls failing in real wood is if you are counter sinking and making pilot holes. If you just drill the drywall in real wood it will remain in place until you use the drill to pull it out.


H…. & biotec
I will more than likely go for one 21 in it’s own cabinet so, the baffle board will be 36 mm. No name necessary for this design. It’s just a basic reflex box designed to low. Save the fancy names for the horns.

mobiele eenheid
strength is definitely the concept behind all my subs so, I might as well go for a 36 mm rear wall.

csg

I can’t say I’ve ever cut off my boxes at 36 Hertz. I’ve used 27 Hertz for a few years until last week when I reduced them down to 25 Hertz (12 dB octave). The driver’s unload (in the cabinet) at 14 Hertz. Yes, I measured them. When I noticed sound was still emitting through the boxes at 20 Hertz (SPL was low of course) I decided to find out how low will they go before the driver unloads.

wafflesomd

Having boxes offering frequencies below 30 Hz, usually means you are relatively flat @ 30 Hertz. For those tracks that sweep into 30 Hertz, a box offering a – 3dB in the upper twenties will do a far better job producing 30 Hertz than, a box offering a – 3dB point in the mid 30’s.

There is a shop in NYC that sells Beyma's so, that will be the next step.

Best Regards,


Edited by Elliot Thompson - 16 September 2008 at 12:56am
Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.