|
New Push-Pull 15" |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1234 10> |
| Author | |
Tony Wilkes 
Old Croc 
Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 04 October 2011 at 12:34pm |
Exactly, he has convinced me to at least give it a go. |
|
|
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
|
 |
|
|
soundchippy
Young Croc 
Joined: 09 September 2011 Location: Tavistock Status: Offline Points: 770 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 October 2011 at 6:54pm |
|
any thought on whether this driver arrangement would yield any benefit to a double bp6?
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Wilkes
Old Croc
Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 October 2011 at 7:22pm |
|
Different beast altogether, the sole purpose of a BP6 is to make use of the extra gain from the pass band loading. It results in a louder cab than a standard reflex but also comes with a downside.
The cab as shown is optimised for B6 loading which gives good extension in a compact enclosure but requires external processing to achieve this. The so called Push-Pull loading gives the advantage of lower 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion which results in very clean bass. Group delay is also very low in this design. Tony |
|
|
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
|
|
|
|
soundchippy
Young Croc
Joined: 09 September 2011 Location: Tavistock Status: Offline Points: 770 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 October 2011 at 7:37pm |
|
i understand that. what i am curious about is whether the push/pull loading and a bp6 design could be married to create the best of both worlds. low distortion/group delay and higher output thanks to bp6 design.
think of it as having the slot area ported making it the front chamber. i'm not talking about using a b6 alignment. |
|
|
|
|
Steve_B
Old Croc
Joined: 29 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 October 2011 at 11:19pm |
|
Tony I just saw push pull and though of an isobaric type come movement rather than push push where the air in the cabinet and V slot is compressed even if one of the drive units is reversed. |
|
|
|
|
Tony Wilkes
Old Croc
Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 October 2011 at 7:59am |
|
It confused me at first but it does seem to have become a generic name for them.
Hope you are well mate, Tony |
|
|
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
|
|
|
|
geez
Registered User 
Joined: 02 October 2009 Location: Romford Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2012 at 12:44pm |
|
Tony, I've spent some time reading up on these and the B6 alignment for a potential experimental project of my own so this is a really interesting post for me.
How would you do the required processing using a DCX? from what i've read you need +6db of gain at Fb with Q=2. The DCX only gives a Q adjustment on it's bandpass filter. If a potential B6 cab had an Fb of say 35Hz how would you set the low crossover point and an additional filter to correct it to flat? Cheers Tom |
|
|
You don't always get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get.
|
|
|
|
|
neonogin
Registered User
Joined: 11 August 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 March 2012 at 4:45am |
|
Looks very similar to the Ohm Pukk 212 / 215 / 218 box if you look inside.
http://www.ohm.co.uk/download/DATASHEET/PUKK-218%20Datasheet.pdf I wonder if that is B6 loaded too ??? |
|
|
|
|
Tony Wilkes
Old Croc
Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 March 2012 at 7:24am |
Yes AFAIK the Ohms are B6 slot loaded like djk's, they use great drivers as well :) Tony |
|
|
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
|
|
|
|
Disco Stu
Old Croc
Joined: 03 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2487 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 March 2012 at 9:05am |
|
Tony did you say you managed to squeeze 2x15" into 95l?
Stu |
|
|
All you need to know is:
Sensitivity + Power Handling - Power Compression = Max Output My acts: www.myspace.com/thebowiexperience www.myspace.com/scheisseelektronisches |
|
|
|
|
Tony Wilkes
Old Croc
Joined: 02 August 2004 Location: West Midlands Status: Offline Points: 4840 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 March 2012 at 2:09pm |
Yes mate but that's net volume, the total volume of the box is larger because of the chamber. Actual box sizes are 750w x 500h x 550d. Tony |
|
|
www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
|
|
|
|
Chaps
Registered User
Joined: 19 October 2010 Location: Danmark Status: Offline Points: 58 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 April 2012 at 6:07pm |
|
Did this box ever become reality?
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 10> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
mykey- wrote: