Outdo B&C 21DS115 and upgrade to modular subs |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 8> |
Author | |||
gen0me
Young Croc Joined: 20 February 2016 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 999 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I meant maximum displacement available to driver from its Xmax. And maximum of excursion on simulation of cone excursion characteristics. In everything else we seem to agree. Anyway those drivers have so strong motors their excursion is small: So: Edited by gen0me - 11 December 2018 at 10:15pm |
|||
I appreciate every like :)) https//www.facebook.com/genomesoundsystems
Mixes: https://www.mixcloud.com/gen-ome/ |
|||
Elliot Thompson
Old Croc Joined: 02 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5175 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Two Double Twelve Bins (Eminence LAB 12) offer a displacement of 2610 cc Vd One B&C offers a displacement of 2483 cc Vd This is what you wrote:
I offered multi-sub solution that fell within 180 Litres per unit, achieved 25 Hz and, offered more output in multiples than a single B&C 21 DS115 and, does not weigh a lot. That is what you requested based on your quote above. If you want to talk about price, only someone who lives in Czech Republic will be able to determine the exchange rate of importing drivers. I live in the States. However, I do recall stating
Best Regards, Edited by Elliot Thompson - 12 December 2018 at 1:23am |
|||
Elliot Thompson
|
|||
Crashpc
Registered User Joined: 26 February 2008 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 465 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Elliot: 21DS115: Sd: 1680cm^2; Real Xmax 11mm, Real Vd 1848cm^3; Usable Vd based on Xvar 2772cm^3. I have used that speaker extensively, and it behaves very well at Xvar. See that B&C shows greater Xmax (15mm) for smaller Real Xmax. It´s because they have different methods, and also distortion VS cone excursion is different between speakers. Eminence Lab12: Sd 506.7cm^2, Real Xmax 11,7mm, Real Vd 592,8cm^3; Usable Vd based on Xmax (so they say - I don´t mean it negatively here) 770,6cm^3. Four speakers make Vd of 3082.4 cm^3 Therefore you´re right here. Let me follow with sims: One DS115 versus four labs. DS115 gives 125db down to 26,5Hz, LABs go 125db down to 22Hz. That is 4,5Hz difference. About adequate upgrade. I do not know If we account for speakers coupling, but the DS rules in the upper 30-40Hz range anyway. It looks like four pieces of LABs would about win those 4,5Hz. Okay, I take it. BUT, two bins and four LABs in 360l box volume are 1600$, the 21DS115 in 180l was for $800, and does about keep up all the way down to 27Hz. Only gets wrecked in four-five Hz territory. It does not feel like worthy upgrade to me. I need moar for the volume and money. I guess two pieces of 18DS115 would still win volume vise and price vise, compared to Labs, with 3300cm^3 of displacement volume. For under $1400 total. I take your proposal, it has some merits. Thank you for that. Yet I am not totally pushed by time or money, so I will look around if there is another possibility with better value. Again, I think I really DO want too much from what is possible (to buy)... gen0me: Yes. That´s the case here. Now Once one has cone excursion "to spare", there is no easier way than push it where needed (using EQ) and squeeze additional SPL from it. For example at, or under the bassreflex port tuning. Weaker driver with lesser Xmax cannot do that. So it will lose on both max SPL and range. English is not my native language. It seems we have little misunderstanding between each other from time to time. And that is solved after longer discussion, but nobody gets back to re-agree once again what has been said.
Edited by Crashpc - 12 December 2018 at 8:28am |
|||
Nikon and Canon people should not be married to each other. Why did you let this happen?
|
|||
MarjanM
Old Croc Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7816 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Forget Lab12. BMS 12S330 is much more affordable, more powerful and more sensitive.
|
|||
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
|||
toastyghost
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 09 January 2007 Location: Manchester Status: Offline Points: 10919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Are you only looking at reflex? You need to get into unconventional shape tapped horns if you want to go this low and use small cones.
|
|||
Crashpc
Registered User Joined: 26 February 2008 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 465 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
MarjanM: Thanks. I will look into that. It has smaller Xmax, but it is cheaper, and has more powerful motor. I´ll do some sims etc...
toastyghost: many other box types are allowed, except for BP. I did some sims and it seems that some 8"-12"s could do the job in small THs.
|
|||
Nikon and Canon people should not be married to each other. Why did you let this happen?
|
|||
toastyghost
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 09 January 2007 Location: Manchester Status: Offline Points: 10919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
There are some DIY versions of the TH-Spud that would put you in the right ballpark.
|
|||
Crashpc
Registered User Joined: 26 February 2008 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 465 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I´ve played with tapped horns. Firstly with very, very "unusable" driver, then 8$ 6.5" driver, and it turned out quite well, and I might experiment some more. Handling of those horns is not best, due to its dimension, but it is still way better than 21DS115.
Here is the second try: Go to 1:00 and further. It worked quite well for just quick brute assy with random components laying on the ground waiting to get trashed... I can only imagine that with good long-throw 8", it would be serious worker. In stack of 4-8, it should do... Only if it could have more cubical design.
|
|||
Nikon and Canon people should not be married to each other. Why did you let this happen?
|
|||
mobiele eenheid
Old Croc Joined: 15 August 2004 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1568 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If the average sensitivity is 1.5 dB lower, you'll have to compensate this with more Watts. 1.5 dB at these power levels translates to 500 - 1000 W more power, for the low Qes driver, to get the same SPLmax. |
|||
Crashpc
Registered User Joined: 26 February 2008 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 465 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
mobiele eenheid: The description is rather up to you. I´m trying to follow and understand why you say this. From your current response, I cannot agree in general. Keep in mind, that this driver, giving for example 1.5db less output power doesn´t give it at the same input power as the high Q driver. It is more likely than not, that the driver is just underpowered (for example due to the higher impedance in that particular frequency) so if you EQ it up 1.5db, it will get to the same power as the high Q driver.
So no more power is pushed/drawn by the driver. I.E. that thesis you presented is not very valid.
|
|||
Nikon and Canon people should not be married to each other. Why did you let this happen?
|
|||
mobiele eenheid
Old Croc Joined: 15 August 2004 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1568 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
However I do feel I'm wasting time trying to explain something that I think will help you reach your goals and as my effort seems not appreciated, I will leave it at this. |
|||
Crashpc
Registered User Joined: 26 February 2008 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 465 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I´m saying that there is no reason why would the low Q driver need to get 1000W more than the high Q driver, when you attempt to level out the frequency response by 1.5db EQ as in your example. The driver with less SPL output plays less because it gets less power, not because it doesn´t work as well and efficiently as high Q driver. I believe I got your explanation right, it´s just that it is of no use for my case. Therefore we both waste our time.... Best regards.
|
|||
Nikon and Canon people should not be married to each other. Why did you let this happen?
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 8> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |