Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Electro Frying Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - pd1850 aes or rms
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

pd1850 aes or rms

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
Message
norty303 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: Eastbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 8800
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote norty303 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 6:04pm
I'm not sure I understand where/why the efficiency stuff has come into this. The AES rating doesn't say 'but obviously stuff will change like when they're in a horn'.

Its about a common set of parameters by which to compare drivers. So if a driver will do 800w under AES conditions then it can do 800w. If it happens to gain different parameters under horn loading then so what? It's different paramters to how other drivers are being measured. I'd guess that the horn isn't a magic horn for just 1850's, therefore you could say that about any of the other drivers too (assuming they're meant for horns)
My laser stuff: Frikkin Lasers
Back to Top
Timebomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2004
Location: Lancaster
Status: Offline
Points: 2763
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timebomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 7:25pm
Exactly, the efficiency of the cab dos not directly affect the thermal power handling.  if you put 150V across a 1850 your going to blow it whatever cab its in.  You may gain better mechanical power handling due to decreased excursion but that depends on the designs your comparing.

If your horn is 6dB more efficient than the reflex, so you put in 1/4 the power to get the same output, then the driver wont get as hot, but that's only because you putting less power in, it hasn't magically been transformed into a driver that can take twice the power. 


James Secker          facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk               www.soundgear.co.uk
Back to Top
Timebomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2004
Location: Lancaster
Status: Offline
Points: 2763
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timebomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 7:34pm
Originally posted by levyte357 levyte357 wrote:

Originally posted by Timebomb Timebomb wrote:


Older Turbo and FK1 stuff is the same, the new FK1 21" has a 6" coil but is only rated at 750W.  ive seen 4" coil drivers rated at twice that.
 
Thought length and guage of VC primarily dictate power handling, not the diameter.
 
Would be possibe to make 3" VC that handles 2Kw, but sensivity would be about as good as deaf man wearing cheap hearing aid, with no batteries.


Just looked it up and its the area of the coil that primarily dictates power handling, so the circumference multiplied by the winding height.  A 2" coil with 20mm depth would have the same power handling as a 4" coil with 10mm depth, assuming everything elce was the same, thermal transfer to the pole peice etc.

I think i read the FK1 6" coil driver i mentiond has 2 coils and 2 magnets and 2 top plates, im not sure how that changes the power handleing compaird to 1 longer coil, id assume its similar though the thermal transfer to the top plates would change.

  
James Secker          facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk               www.soundgear.co.uk
Back to Top
pfly View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 October 2007
Location: Helsinki, Fin
Status: Offline
Points: 2827
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pfly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 9:06pm
Timebomb but you understand my logic behind the question, if the horn/driver -combo transforms more of that power it receives into sound, then there should be less power transforming into heat...
Back to Top
RUS View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 02 September 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 3471
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RUS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 10:19pm
Originally posted by pfly pfly wrote:

Timebomb but you understand my logic behind the question, if the horn/driver -combo transforms more of that power it receives into sound, then there should be less power transforming into heat...
 
 
no i wouldnt say so
Back to Top
Meat View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 05 June 2009
Location: Manc
Status: Offline
Points: 1513
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Meat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 10:32pm
I assume theres something peer reviewed that'd settle it. If anyone knows the paper or has a reference that looks like it could I'll download it.

I'm not an engineer. All I know is that thing about free lunches and that the energy input = useful output - losses. If I'm wrong I'd like someone to explain why. I've heard about more horn drivers being consistently overdriven than just the 1850. I love being wrong because then I can learn and move on however I'm going to bark up the wrong kettle of fish until I find out otherwise.

Is it possible that PD have actually underrated their driver on purpose because a blown driver is a bad advert for that driver and they'd rather have the reputation of dependability, being built like a tank than just have a bigger number for the marketing department willy waving competition that is spec sheets?

Maybe the mark 3 will be like the 'new' fane XB ie. exactly the same but with the less conservative number on it?
Don't test the champignon sound
Back to Top
norty303 View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Location: Eastbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 8800
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote norty303 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 10:41pm
I think what you're referring to is not a function of the horn allowing them to be overdriven so hard thermally, but the fact (as someone commented on previously in the thread) that other factors DO NOT prevent such heavy use, most usually Xmech.

In a vented box there will be less resistance to the cone movement so it'll bottom out probably long before the VC burns. In fact, you may well expect the vented box to take more power (if you could control the other factors) as it'll be cooling better with the increased cone movement.
My laser stuff: Frikkin Lasers
Back to Top
RUS View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 02 September 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 3471
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RUS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 10:54pm
i personally dont think pd would under spec there drivers even tho some amp companys do
its not like they've ever made it know
 
 
Back to Top
toastyghost View Drop Down
The 10,000 Points Club
The 10,000 Points Club
Avatar

Joined: 09 January 2007
Location: Manchester
Status: Offline
Points: 10932
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote toastyghost Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 11:10pm
How many of the people saying that the PD1850 can take more than it's AES spec are actually putting all that extra power in as a continuous sine wave?
Back to Top
Timebomb View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2004
Location: Lancaster
Status: Offline
Points: 2763
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timebomb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2009 at 11:19pm
To do a proper power test you want to use bandwidth limited pink noise,  if you used a sine wave it will depend on what frequency.

EG it could well be 50 ohms at 40 Hz so that will throw things way off.

I bet 5 internets it would take 1000W
James Secker          facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk               www.soundgear.co.uk
Back to Top
Meat View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 05 June 2009
Location: Manc
Status: Offline
Points: 1513
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Meat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 November 2009 at 2:02am
I see your 5 internets and raise you a jelly snake.
Don't test the champignon sound
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.