Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Electro Frying Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - PD1850 vs PD1851 - Diffs/Advantages/Disadvantages
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

PD1850 vs PD1851 - Diffs/Advantages/Disadvantages

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>
Author
Message
PauliePaul View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 14 August 2009
Location: Birmingham
Status: Offline
Points: 1485
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PauliePaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 5:15pm
Originally posted by tall_mike tall_mike wrote:

Looks like the 1851 is built to higher excursion tolerances but the compromise is probably lack of cone control at the extremeties of this excursion. Unless the magnet is much deeper, doesn't look it though?

Power handing may be higher, but that's because they're more than a db less efficient - so they generate more heat to get the same output.

I think around 10mm from memory.... don't quote me though....
Back to Top
pfly View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 October 2007
Location: Helsinki, Fin
Status: Offline
Points: 2827
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pfly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 5:19pm
Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:


Originally posted by levyte357- levyte357- wrote:


Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:



Usually 18-inch drivers that offer high sensitivities mean they offer more mid/kick-bass than lower sensitivity 18-inch drivers. That may be a good or bad thing pending on what you are looking to achieve.

Best Regards,


The V18-1000/1850 loaded in, compatible horn loaded cabs, will do the lowest sub notes, but with a peaky response, until at  least 4x cabs in one stack..

Warmer, less sensitive, lower BL drivers, have flatter response, but lower SPL at lowest notes.



If you used the PD 186 it would go even lower than the PD 1850/V18-1000 in a horn. This is due the PD 186 was designed to go lower based on its TS Parameters.

A Peaky response is usually due to the limitation of the cabinet size. It is common with large woofers housed in small horns, reflex, and/or sealed enclosures. This is why some resort to smaller drivers where the loudspeaker chassis does not take up 50% of the cabinet it resides in.

A woofer in a cabinet that delivers a flat response tells you the driver is in a optimum chamber and, will not need to do a lot of work (due to excessive equalisation) to achieve the a lot of SPL. A good example is a high frequency compression driver on a large exponential horn.

Best Regards,




I like to think folded horns (scoops included) as a larger box that is just split into pieces that two to four people are able to lift.  If they are thought like this, if you get peaky response from one box but four or six boxes next to each other smooth it out, then it works exactly like intended. It is not just that peaky response means the box is not optimized for particular driver. When enough boxes are used, those "tight" drivers start to show what they can do.
Back to Top
ape3435 View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 23 August 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 552
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ape3435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 5:21pm


[/QUOTE]

The point I was making is, The PD1851, PD186, V18-1200, Fane 18XB, all have warm musical tone.

The PD1850/V18-1000 have aggressive in your face "gruff", that need "some" param eq to warm them up.


True that Lev, I've got my 1850s under a tube preamp and param eq, so they sound warm enough
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 9:48pm
Originally posted by pfly pfly wrote:

Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:


Originally posted by levyte357- levyte357- wrote:


Originally posted by Elliot Thompson Elliot Thompson wrote:



Usually 18-inch drivers that offer high sensitivities mean they offer more mid/kick-bass than lower sensitivity 18-inch drivers. That may be a good or bad thing pending on what you are looking to achieve.

Best Regards,


The V18-1000/1850 loaded in, compatible horn loaded cabs, will do the lowest sub notes, but with a peaky response, until at  least 4x cabs in one stack..

Warmer, less sensitive, lower BL drivers, have flatter response, but lower SPL at lowest notes.



If you used the PD 186 it would go even lower than the PD 1850/V18-1000 in a horn. This is due the PD 186 was designed to go lower based on its TS Parameters.

A Peaky response is usually due to the limitation of the cabinet size. It is common with large woofers housed in small horns, reflex, and/or sealed enclosures. This is why some resort to smaller drivers where the loudspeaker chassis does not take up 50% of the cabinet it resides in.

A woofer in a cabinet that delivers a flat response tells you the driver is in a optimum chamber and, will not need to do a lot of work (due to excessive equalisation) to achieve the a lot of SPL. A good example is a high frequency compression driver on a large exponential horn.

Best Regards,




I like to think folded horns (scoops included) as a larger box that is just split into pieces that two to four people are able to lift.  If they are thought like this, if you get peaky response from one box but four or six boxes next to each other smooth it out, then it works exactly like intended. It is not just that peaky response means the box is not optimized for particular driver. When enough boxes are used, those "tight" drivers start to show what they can do.

The majority of old small folded horns (scoops included) were designed operate with a minimum of four bins. The DJs I know in the States & the West Indies that use such bins would not use less than 8 - 18 bins.

 

I might add small folded horns (scoops included) are limited to the horn's length. Since those boxes are designed quarter space, you can only get louder by having a larger mouth area once you exceed four bins. However getting a flatter response the lower you go requires a longer horn path (Terror Horn & Lab Sub) which small folded horns (scoops included) cannot offer.

 

Since the length of the horn determines the lower frequency cut-off point and, the driver requires a certain amount of space in order to create lower frequencies, using a small horn will not give you a flat response used in multiples if the if the length of the horn is too short for the driver to deliver the given frequencies. You will attain a peak above the horns cut-off point and your dB level will decline beyond that.

The biggest misconception are many running about with a bunch of small horns assuming  the frequency will go lower and flatter by quadrupling the amount small horns. You cannot get lower with a great amount of SPL below the length of horn's cut-off point.

 

Many have tried using heavy equalisation to force lower frequencies in such cabinets. The end result is finding them selves constantly repairing blown woofers.

 

Best Regards,





Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
pfly View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 October 2007
Location: Helsinki, Fin
Status: Offline
Points: 2827
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pfly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 10:06pm
Yes, I did know all that, I did not mention lower cutoff at any point. f3 probably goes tiny bit lower but main thing that happens with these compromised quarter wave horns is the more even frequency response.

Funny thing is that my scoop (which is almost 10cm deeper than any other "normal" scoop I know) goes almost as low as Lab Sub. I also have a feeling that scoops are slightly more tolerable to too small mouth area

Courtesy of Lasse & Huhts, 1, 2, 4 and 6 Lab subs outside without boundaries, not calibrated for SPL


Four of my Polar Bear design, outside, measured with same software, same settings and same microphone, not calibrated for SPL


Although my scoop lacks the last "peak" of Lab at around 35hz, you could say the response is really similar below 100hz.


Edited by pfly - 15 August 2012 at 7:22am
Back to Top
Elliot Thompson View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elliot Thompson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 10:37pm
It appears your box peaks between 70 - 80 Hz with - 3 dB points @ 50 Hz in addition to 90 Hz.

Best Regards,
Elliot Thompson
Back to Top
pfly View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 October 2007
Location: Helsinki, Fin
Status: Offline
Points: 2827
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pfly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2012 at 7:20am
If you were to take -3dB point like that (from highest point?), four Labs would have it around 55hz, doesn't sound quite right.

I rather take average level between the intended usable range ie. 30-100hz and see -3dB from that.

But anyway, back to original topic, I'd love to test several drivers in my scoops but right now I don't have money nor time for that. I do agree that something like Turbomaxxes could maybe produce a bit more sub than V18-1000 that I use now, specially since my scoops are what is today described as large chamber scoop. PD.1851 would be my prime interest.

You can quite nicely see the behaviour when more horn  boxes are put next to each other in the Lab sub graph


Edited by pfly - 15 August 2012 at 7:21am
Back to Top
levyte357- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 27 July 2012
Location: UK, South East
Status: Offline
Points: 8517
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote levyte357- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2012 at 11:02am
@Pfly, remember Elliot doesn't like scoops, and doesn't think they can do sub.. LOL

But anyway, back on topic, this is all about comparing '50 vs '51.

Really need feedback from people who have upgraded from '50 to '51, in same cab, using same amps.

Who aren't afraid of being subjective, and just reporting back what their ears are telling them. LOL
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.
Back to Top
Adam_Iron_Horse View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 02 January 2010
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Adam_Iron_Horse Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2012 at 11:13am
Electrikal did that levyte might be worth a gander?
Back to Top
ceharden View Drop Down
The 10,000 Points Club
The 10,000 Points Club
Avatar

Joined: 05 June 2005
Location: Southampton
Status: Offline
Points: 11851
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ceharden Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2012 at 12:04pm
Originally posted by levyte357- levyte357- wrote:


Really need feedback from people who have upgraded from '50 to '51, in same cab, using same amps.

Who aren't afraid of being subjective, and just reporting back what their ears are telling them. LOL


Or what their wallet is persuading their ears to tell them!
Back to Top
luton_soundman View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 03 August 2010
Location: Bedfordshire
Status: Offline
Points: 4550
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote luton_soundman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2012 at 12:06pm
Originally posted by ceharden ceharden wrote:

Originally posted by levyte357- levyte357- wrote:


Really need feedback from people who have upgraded from '50 to '51, in same cab, using same amps.

Who aren't afraid of being subjective, and just reporting back what their ears are telling them. LOL


Or what their wallet is persuading their ears to tell them!
 
+10000!
 
 
Sound Hire/Sales new/used equipment.
Back to Top
levyte357- View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 27 July 2012
Location: UK, South East
Status: Offline
Points: 8517
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote levyte357- Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2012 at 12:17pm
Originally posted by luton_soundman luton_soundman wrote:

Originally posted by ceharden ceharden wrote:

Originally posted by levyte357- levyte357- wrote:


Really need feedback from people who have upgraded from '50 to '51, in same cab, using same amps.

Who aren't afraid of being subjective, and just reporting back what their ears are telling them. LOL


Or what their wallet is persuading their ears to tell them!
 
+10000!
 
 


BA '51 price is £348, '50 = £325,  LOL
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.