Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Plans > Po rn Horns
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Porn horn plots?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Porn horn plots?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
matt andrews View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 15 September 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 501
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote matt andrews Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Porn horn plots?
    Posted: 17 March 2006 at 7:20am
I cant find any 1w/1m response plots of the porn horn mids

Anyone have some?

Cheers
Back to Top
Dom View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1700
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2006 at 10:23am
Ask and you shall receive....



Pink line is nearfield.

Blue line is some watts at some metres (maybe 2 metres from the horn mouth) and is the one you really want to pay attention to...
"It sounded like a million fire engines chasing ten million ambulances through a war zone and it was played at a volume that made the empty chair beside me bleed."
Back to Top
tendril View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 22 July 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 334
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tendril Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2006 at 2:37pm
Nasty dip just above 250 
Tendril

A mistake is a mistake only if one learns nothing from it.
Back to Top
Dom View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1700
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2006 at 3:12pm
If you speak to Dave nicely he might even post up the acabak simulation he did and see how they compare...  Pretty sure the sim has the same dip...

That plot was with a 15l (not including driver displacement) rear chamber.  Definately needs to be smaller. 
"It sounded like a million fire engines chasing ten million ambulances through a war zone and it was played at a volume that made the empty chair beside me bleed."
Back to Top
davey t View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 March 2004
Location: Bristol UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1428
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote davey t Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 March 2006 at 4:21am

 did you check coherence for this plot? it could have been off at 250hz, especially if you are indoors.

My back chamber is as small as it could be to fit the driver in.

What frequency does the low roll off? its not too bad really - i've seen much worse from "pro" cabs.  i'l try a 3db dip centred at 500hz next time i get them out as the plot suggests.

Back to Top
davey t View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 11 March 2004
Location: Bristol UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1428
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote davey t Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 March 2006 at 4:22am
was that taken with crossover filters in place?
Back to Top
Dom View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 25 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1700
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 March 2006 at 1:39pm
Plot was taken outside and was the same on the off axis plots as well.  Since the dip is also present on the nearfield (at horn mouth) measurement I can't see that it's anything to do with cancellations.

It's a long time since we did the plots but I think there will of been some filters in place, but at a frequency above/below the natural roll off.
"It sounded like a million fire engines chasing ten million ambulances through a war zone and it was played at a volume that made the empty chair beside me bleed."
Back to Top
Dave Slater View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 28 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 373
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dave Slater Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 April 2006 at 10:04am

not the best simulation in the world but it's reasonable

this is with an 8l rear chamber and what we've used in the final build but the results from other sims show that between 3 and 5l is best (8l being the upper limit before it starts getting ugly)

on a side note i used 12Kg of rice to find out that the SN-12B displaces 3l and there's 1.5l contained within the cone itself

Back to Top
zALTEC View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 May 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote zALTEC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2006 at 8:28am
Dave: i made a Akabak sim but it looks different to your, mine rolloff at 1khz much like the plot and i only have 1dB of ripple.

Dom: did you use a ECM8000 for the measurement? Honestly i tought PH had a better response but i see it's useable only to 800hz. i was thinking to buy 4 porn mids but looking at this plots i think i'm not sure as before to use them.
What about sound quality? They're good for rock? Is that 250hz dip audible?
Anyway i was thinking to use 18 Sound 12MB700 because i already have 4 of them and using a 4L sealed rear chamber made of alu. Maybe 18 Sound could be better than P.Audio and with a such small rear chamber the plot would be much more linear.

What do you think?

Regards,
Giorgio
Back to Top
Mark James View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 15 January 2006
Location: rig side
Status: Offline
Points: 5306
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mark James Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2006 at 1:17pm
we tried playing metal through some porns we borrowed, and decided v,quickly that for guitars and that kind of music in general they just didnt cut the mustard. maybey we just dont hav e enough experience to get the best out of them but realy i wasnt impressed. [hides behind wall]
insert silly sentence here
Back to Top
zALTEC View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 May 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote zALTEC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2006 at 5:05pm
Coner can you tell me more info about the system you played? Driver used, xover freq, amp used, etc.
And what did you not like of the sound of the porn? the low-mid, the mid, the mid-high, the high, the overall performance, lack of transients, too much distorsion, canny or "horny" sound, etc.

Thank you :)
Back to Top
Mark James View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc
Avatar

Joined: 15 January 2006
Location: rig side
Status: Offline
Points: 5306
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mark James Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 April 2006 at 7:03pm

well i dont know too much we just borrowed [well a mate brought a pair along] im pressuming they were standared porns [sn12 or whatever the driver is] i think we only realy messed around with the x-over [mid - hi] a little between 800hz and 1.2 khz [where there seemed to be a gap] we were runing em over 4 v-18 loaded 1850s powered [iirc i might be wrong i wasnt too close to the rack that much that night because i was alitlle worsce for wear] i think they on ly played with the x-over between the bass and mid at around 120hz<160hz. they seemed to have a reasonable kick but strugled i felt around the upper end [700hz and up im guesing you need something inbetween the comp and 12, other wise your putting alot of the guitars through the comp, and if you use a 6 or 8" inbetween you risk [well not risk you do] x-ing over in the vocal area maybey twice [depends on how heigh your upper mid will get before the comp]

i believe the porns are due a 6.5" upper mid soon [dont quote me]

and i believe we didnt give them a fair test. we had a bad selection of amps [old pv cs800 for mids and a carlsboro 500 for tops both on the way out] and we run in mono . so realy im v.biased. they are a damn good box if you know how to use em, and i will reconsider them when the 6.55" upper mid becomes availabe.

insert silly sentence here
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.