Print Page | Close Window

18sound kit18 question

Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Plans
Forum Name: Ported Enclosures
Forum Description: Post all your reflex and bandpass and 'other' boxes with holes in stuff here...
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=109412
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 6:54pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: 18sound kit18 question
Posted By: twosteps
Subject: 18sound kit18 question
Date Posted: 30 January 2026 at 2:22am
i've come up on 6x 18lw1400 drivers and id like to make some reflex cabs for em. 
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/caja-acustica-de-18-sound-kit18/65765469" rel="nofollow - https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/caja-acustica-de-18-sound-kit18/65765469

the kit18 seems like the right choice considering it was designed around the driver. however it seems like the cab volume is a bit low, which is probly contributing to the 35hz fall off and i'd like a bit more low end extension. 

i'm wondering if i extend the baffle 68mm to the face of the cab instead of being recessed, should i keep the same port length (moving it up with the baffle)? or should i extend the port by 68mm so the port begins in the same place in the cab (but is longer)? 

i've never tried to modify a plan, and cant seem to get winisd to work, so i'm unsure how it'd effect the performance/tuning. some insight would be greatly appreciated. 

also, i'm not married to the kit18, so if theres other plans available that'd be a good/better fit for the 18lw1400 that can meet my midtops at 100/120hz, please give em a shout =D

thanks



Replies:
Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 30 January 2026 at 6:15am
What about this one? I think its the updated version for HP drivers 

https://www.eighteensound.it/media/W1siZiIsIjIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMTRfMDVfNTlfMzA3XzE4U3ViX3YxXzEucGRmIl1d%20" rel="nofollow - https://www.eighteensound.it/media/W1siZiIsIjIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMTRfMDVfNTlfMzA3XzE4U3ViX3YxXzEucGRmIl1d

I'm heavily considering building 4 of them. 


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 30 January 2026 at 7:31am
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

What about this one? I think its the updated version for HP drivers 

https://www.eighteensound.it/media/W1siZiIsIjIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMTRfMDVfNTlfMzA3XzE4U3ViX3YxXzEucGRmIl1d%20" rel="nofollow - https://www.eighteensound.it/media/W1siZiIsIjIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMTRfMDVfNTlfMzA3XzE4U3ViX3YxXzEucGRmIl1d

I'm heavily considering building 4 of them. 

i’ve checked that out but like the cab shape of the kit18 and it also seems like a simpler build than this newer design. i currently have 4 of the drivers in eaw sb180’s which have very similar dimensions to the design you posted. seeking something a bit deeper for stacking purposes. 


Posted By: DMorison
Date Posted: 01 February 2026 at 2:56pm
Originally posted by twosteps twosteps wrote:

the kit18 seems like the right choice considering it was designed around the driver. however it seems like the cab volume is a bit low, which is probly contributing to the 35hz fall off and i'd like a bit more low end extension. 

i'm wondering if i extend the baffle 68mm to the face of the cab instead of being recessed, should i keep the same port length (moving it up with the baffle)? or should i extend the port by 68mm so the port begins in the same place in the cab (but is longer)?

Hi there,
The 35Hz corner is determined by the box volume, port tuning and driver TS parameters all interacting, so while adjusting box size will give you a slightly different response, it might not be all you want.

Adding 68mm cabinet depth adds ~22 litres to the internal volume, which will only make about 1dB of difference in the half-octave around tuning (yellow curve vs green in the below image. To make a full 3dB difference you would need to increase the cab to around 230l net internal, nearly 60% bigger than the original box (red curve).



The one good thing about increasing the internal volume of a cab is that the required port length for a given tuning actually decreases, so for the 167l option here you would reduce the total vent length to about 260mm - which in turn reduces the total space it takes up in the box so you'd actually end up with about 172l rather than the 167. That 5l difference would only make an extra 0.2dB difference to the response though, so I haven't bothered putting it on the graph.

HTH,
David.



Posted By: cravings
Date Posted: 01 February 2026 at 6:45pm
Don't remember exactly off top of my head, but the plan has a suggested eq bum of something like 6db 12db per octave at 25hz


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 02 February 2026 at 6:08pm
Originally posted by DMorison DMorison wrote:

Originally posted by twosteps twosteps wrote:

the kit18 seems like the right choice considering it was designed around the driver. however it seems like the cab volume is a bit low, which is probly contributing to the 35hz fall off and i'd like a bit more low end extension. 

i'm wondering if i extend the baffle 68mm to the face of the cab instead of being recessed, should i keep the same port length (moving it up with the baffle)? or should i extend the port by 68mm so the port begins in the same place in the cab (but is longer)?

Hi there,
The 35Hz corner is determined by the box volume, port tuning and driver TS parameters all interacting, so while adjusting box size will give you a slightly different response, it might not be all you want.

Adding 68mm cabinet depth adds ~22 litres to the internal volume, which will only make about 1dB of difference in the half-octave around tuning (yellow curve vs green in the below image. To make a full 3dB difference you would need to increase the cab to around 230l net internal, nearly 60% bigger than the original box (red curve).



The one good thing about increasing the internal volume of a cab is that the required port length for a given tuning actually decreases, so for the 167l option here you would reduce the total vent length to about 260mm - which in turn reduces the total space it takes up in the box so you'd actually end up with about 172l rather than the 167. That 5l difference would only make an extra 0.2dB difference to the response though, so I haven't bothered putting it on the graph.

HTH,
David.

thanks! this is really helpful i appreciate you taking the time. im just trying to figure out how to get better low end response without a +6db boost at 30hz. i like the idea of using a box designed for the driver but im not sure if i want to push the drivers that hard. 

maybe something like the sub18 would be better suited for the low end response im after, but i imagine that'd likely benefit from modification to be better suited for the 18lw1400?


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 02 February 2026 at 9:56pm
I was considering oversizing the 18sub slightly to fit my drivers, to get something more like 230 net liters instead of 200, but with the lower vas, higher qts, and the need for acoustic resistance in lots of modern drivers, I feel like just making them "bigger" trades a lot of 40hz and up, probably more overall spl lost than gained, so as usual extension for spl, but I don't think a bigger reflex depending on your driver is just better because they need acoustic resistance. Maybe I'm wrong. Also the drivers im looking at in the 18sub (the updated, not the kit) have slightly higher fs so that could be why a larger box wouldn't work as well for me. The 18lw1400 is listed on the compatible drivers list of the plan I posted, I think its about 200l net 


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 02 February 2026 at 11:15pm
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

I was considering oversizing the 18sub slightly to fit my drivers, to get something more like 230 net liters instead of 200, but with the lower vas, higher qts, and the need for acoustic resistance in lots of modern drivers, I feel like just making them "bigger" trades a lot of 40hz and up, probably more overall spl lost than gained, so as usual extension for spl, but I don't think a bigger reflex depending on your driver is just better because they need acoustic resistance. Maybe I'm wrong. Also the drivers im looking at in the 18sub (the updated, not the kit) have slightly higher fs so that could be why a larger box wouldn't work as well for me. The 18lw1400 is listed on the compatible drivers list of the plan I posted, I think its about 200l net 

yeah i did some more reading since posting this thread and found a few discussions mentioning how this driver sounds best in smaller boxes because of the improved dampening. and maybe this allows for it to be pushed harder safely (thinking about the +6db at 30hz in the kit18 plan which just seems wild to me lol).


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 03 February 2026 at 5:55pm
well the 18lw1400 is not a high xmax driver, but its suggested enclosure size ( https://www.eighteensound.it/en/products/lf-driver/18-0/8/18LW1400" rel="nofollow - https://www.eighteensound.it/en/products/lf-driver/18-0/8/18LW1400 ) is 7.77cuft, larger even than the 18sub, (which is 7cuft) I honestly do not think the project 18 that is even much smaller is a good fit, you want the acoustic loading/resistance to match your driver and its vas, so if you do +6db at 30hz you will reach xmax way quicker than  you think you will, and miss out on the upper response of the driver trying to get more sub tuning db. You won't be able to push it harder safely in a box that far under the recommended size, which is why I posted the updated version for higher power/more modern drivers. If you are chasing more 30hz you will lose a lot in the spl and higher (40-70) bass, especially in a smaller box, from my understanding. 


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 03 February 2026 at 9:29pm
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

well the 18lw1400 is not a high xmax driver, but its suggested enclosure size ( https://www.eighteensound.it/en/products/lf-driver/18-0/8/18LW1400" rel="nofollow - https://www.eighteensound.it/en/products/lf-driver/18-0/8/18LW1400 ) is 7.77cuft, larger even than the 18sub, (which is 7cuft) I honestly do not think the project 18 that is even much smaller is a good fit, you want the acoustic loading/resistance to match your driver and its vas, so if you do +6db at 30hz you will reach xmax way quicker than  you think you will, and miss out on the upper response of the driver trying to get more sub tuning db. You won't be able to push it harder safely in a box that far under the recommended size, which is why I posted the updated version for higher power/more modern drivers. If you are chasing more 30hz you will lose a lot in the spl and higher (40-70) bass, especially in a smaller box, from my understanding. 

oh yeah if i do build these kit18's i'd likely be doing +3db at 30hz, im balling on a budget and cant afford to replace drivers =D

right now i have 4 of the drivers in eaw sb180's (~200l volume i think) and they sound pretty dang good.
however i've been looking for 2 more sb180 cabs to house these last 2 drivers, with zero luck. so its looking like im gonna have to build some cabs if i want to use all 6 drivers. 

now im trying to figure out the best plan to run em 30-100 for dnb/jungle/dubstep (lots of heavy sub material) since it seems like the kit18 may not be ideal for this application. 






Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 03 February 2026 at 11:17pm
the 18sub is ideal for 33-100, that's exactly why I'm considering it for my prospective build with B&C drivers. For continuity sake you could just build 2 more sb180 clone cabs, to be honest that is what I would do since you already have so many, no reason to taint the group delay or phase with a slightly differently tuned and sized cab. Definitely a better idea than building two worse mismatched kit18's. I would only build entirely new cabs for all 6 subs if you are switching to a different design, FLH or BP etc, otherwise build 2 clone sb180's. My opinion. 


Posted By: cravings
Date Posted: 03 February 2026 at 11:26pm
just do more sb180s then?


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 03 February 2026 at 11:30pm
Yes, unless you are switching them all to a categorically different design, like horns or paraflex or something, no reason to mismatch or build all new reflex. Will look and sound better too. 


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 03 February 2026 at 11:52pm
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

the 18sub is ideal for 33-100, that's exactly why I'm considering it for my prospective build with B&C drivers. For continuity sake you could just build 2 more sb180 clone cabs, to be honest that is what I would do since you already have so many, no reason to taint the group delay or phase with a slightly differently tuned and sized cab. Definitely a better idea than building two worse mismatched kit18's. I would only build entirely new cabs for all 6 subs if you are switching to a different design, FLH or BP etc, otherwise build 2 clone sb180's. My opinion. 

i was gonna do 6 whole new cabs for the drivers, def not tryna mismatch. 
and yeah i was considering cubo subs or staiper mk3s for this reason but ive read that they don't sound great crossed above ~80hz, and im trying to meet my tops at 100. also i'd probly need to get a bigger storage unit lol =S

Originally posted by cravings cravings wrote:

just do more sb180s then?

ive been searching far and wide for more of these cabs but no luck. 
hadn't considered diy'ing a pair though. 


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 04 February 2026 at 2:36am
Personally, I have changed my mind countless times about what to build. I will say, I thought I cared more about sub 35hz than I actually do after testing, figuring out that 40hz and up is actually where the weight and tonality kind of is, and bass impact, and that is opening up more options. Actually one cabinet that I am seriously considering if I go the no compromise route (as in, stupid amount of plywood and hard to move, for maybe 6-8 more db, for the price of extension and ease of transit etc) are the sound agency SAPFX-LW118, as it is built around the driver you have, If I was you i'd look into it. I wouldn't be convinced about "40hz horns" earlier but now after more testing I think I prefer as body impact and midbass tonality is my aesthetic preference. which happens more in the 40hz-90. They can go up to 120 very linear so could meet your tops easy at 100. https://soundagency.fr/docs/sapfx118-lw-pratique-performant-et-nerveux/" rel="nofollow - https://soundagency.fr/docs/sapfx118-lw-pratique-performant-et-nerveux/

In your position it would be very tempting to make two clones until recommitted to a full 6 of something new. You could try building a couple prototype cabs out of mdf and pick the one you like best.


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 04 February 2026 at 5:25am
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

Personally, I have changed my mind countless times about what to build. I will say, I thought I cared more about sub 35hz than I actually do after testing, figuring out that 40hz and up is actually where the weight and tonality kind of is, and bass impact, and that is opening up more options. Actually one cabinet that I am seriously considering if I go the no compromise route (as in, stupid amount of plywood and hard to move, for maybe 6-8 more db, for the price of extension and ease of transit etc) are the sound agency SAPFX-LW118, as it is built around the driver you have, If I was you i'd look into it. I wouldn't be convinced about "40hz horns" earlier but now after more testing I think I prefer as body impact and midbass tonality is my aesthetic preference. which happens more in the 40hz-90. They can go up to 120 very linear so could meet your tops easy at 100. https://soundagency.fr/docs/sapfx118-lw-pratique-performant-et-nerveux/" rel="nofollow - https://soundagency.fr/docs/sapfx118-lw-pratique-performant-et-nerveux/

In your position it would be very tempting to make two clones until recommitted to a full 6 of something new. You could try building a couple prototype cabs out of mdf and pick the one you like best.

looks pretty sick and very cool it’s designed around the 18lw1400 but it’s not a good fit for my use case. i’m doin parties for like 50-100 people so 6 reflex bins would be plenty of spl for that. and to be honest, i’ve stood in front of a few paraflex rigs (mostly hoqs type-o’s) and they’ve never really hit right, just seemed unsaturated idk 😅
probly just gonna be patient and try to find another pair of sb180s.

good looking out though ✌🏼


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 04 February 2026 at 5:06pm
hey that's actually very helpful to me as well, as I've never listened to a paraflex rig. I thought maybe since this was technically paraflex loaded but transmission line assisted?not a typical type O etc it might be different. I just am a fan of the Sound Agency designs. The hessbh lookin' bussin.

   To be honest the best rig I've ever heard was a very heavy large well tuned indoor reflex, low end theory at the airliner in LA.  Sounds like you are in touch with your aesthetic and crowd so keep doing what works for you.  You may have heard about these already, but  https://planssystemes.notion.site/" rel="nofollow - https://planssystemes.notion.site/ and  http://hornplans.free.fr/" rel="nofollow - http://hornplans.free.fr/ both have lots of designs, there was also a huge spreadsheet based on driver I forget where that was but could find more if you were looking for more a miniscoop or something, that driver probably sounds great in. Cheers 


Posted By: KDW32
Date Posted: 04 February 2026 at 5:16pm
VBS218  with those drivers? 


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 04 February 2026 at 6:00pm
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

hey that's actually very helpful to me as well, as I've never listened to a paraflex rig. I thought maybe since this was technically paraflex loaded but transmission line assisted?not a typical type O etc it might be different. I just am a fan of the Sound Agency designs. The hessbh lookin' bussin.

   To be honest the best rig I've ever heard was a very heavy large well tuned indoor reflex, low end theory at the airliner in LA.  Sounds like you are in touch with your aesthetic and crowd so keep doing what works for you.  You may have heard about these already, but  https://planssystemes.notion.site/" rel="nofollow - https://planssystemes.notion.site/ and  http://hornplans.free.fr/" rel="nofollow - http://hornplans.free.fr/ both have lots of designs, there was also a huge spreadsheet based on driver I forget where that was but could find more if you were looking for more a miniscoop or something, that driver probably sounds great in. Cheers 

man i miss those low end theory parties, what a time =]
but yeah im constantly reading through planssystemes and hornplans and old sp threads brainstorming lol. seems like aside from reflexes the best fit for these drivers for my use case would be the b&c sub18, cubo subs, or mk3 miniscoops, so if i don't find any sb180 cabs by summer im probly gonna go one of those routes.


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 04 February 2026 at 7:12pm
There are some good martin ws18x plans I have cutsheets for, if you are going that direction, I can post the rest. The b&c 18 plan doesn't have bracing but there's a 3d model of it, I think on speakerplans.eu. The 18sub the first one is actually even closer to your recommended volume/vas. Yea low end theory kind of got me into sound systems, I miss it dearly Smile  would go almost every Wednesday. Had a membership card. Good times. 
 



Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 05 February 2026 at 2:50am
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

There are some good martin ws18x plans I have cutsheets for, if you are going that direction, I can post the rest. The b&c 18 plan doesn't have bracing but there's a 3d model of it, I think on speakerplans.eu. The 18sub the first one is actually even closer to your recommended volume/vas. Yea low end theory kind of got me into sound systems, I miss it dearly Smile  would go almost every Wednesday. Had a membership card. Good times. 
 

i mean maybe the paraflex deal was just operator error idk but it’s 0/3 standing in front of a paraflex rig and the bassweight feeling kinda hollow for dnb/dubstep unfortunately. maybe the sound agency design is better 🤷‍♂️

you still in LA? 👀


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 05 February 2026 at 4:35am
Nope, Been in Colorado for a while now. Definitely miss the ability to go to any kind of shows any night of the week Ouch  from sludge metal at the whiskey to jazz fusion at the baked potato...  low end always had the best system I thought. was into dubstep and dnb and stuff before then but experimental electronic was really hitting in the 2010's.  Around here its all... uhh... bluegrass and very *bad* dj's. Maybe one or two good electronic acts a year, and the venue is really hard to tune, uncomfortable to listen to, not much of a scene. 

I think paraflex takes effort to tame, it doesn't surprise me someone built it as their first rig based on specs and isn't able to run it. Crazy rising response, and I don't like only being able to use a fraction of the drivers power handling. Among other things like step response being wonky for aligning to anything else. But if they sound bad they sound bad, no measurements mean much after that.  I have some other pet theories about paraflex im harboring. Do you get to take your rig out very often in LA?  




Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 25 February 2026 at 10:37pm
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

Nope, Been in Colorado for a while now. Definitely miss the ability to go to any kind of shows any night of the week Ouch  from sludge metal at the whiskey to jazz fusion at the baked potato...  low end always had the best system I thought. was into dubstep and dnb and stuff before then but experimental electronic was really hitting in the 2010's.  Around here its all... uhh... bluegrass and very *bad* dj's. Maybe one or two good electronic acts a year, and the venue is really hard to tune, uncomfortable to listen to, not much of a scene. 

I think paraflex takes effort to tame, it doesn't surprise me someone built it as their first rig based on specs and isn't able to run it. Crazy rising response, and I don't like only being able to use a fraction of the drivers power handling. Among other things like step response being wonky for aligning to anything else. But if they sound bad they sound bad, no measurements mean much after that.  I have some other pet theories about paraflex im harboring. Do you get to take your rig out very often in LA?  


I do little renegade parties once a month, like 25ish people with my friends and I spinning music. For that I just use 2 of the reflexes and a pair of 12+1 powered tops. 

However, I recently got access to a private property desert location though, so we're going to be going out this summer and doing little desert parties which is why I want to make use of all 6 sub drivers I have. 

Not sure how many people I could satiate with just 4x 18" reflexes outdoors. 


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 26 February 2026 at 3:44am
Sounds sick bro. Venue is always the hard part. Definitely depends on which drivers you are talking, reflex isn't that terrible outdoors for the size, especially if under 100 closer up. maybe not ideal, but sounds like you know what you are doing definitely comes down to the engineer not the design. I am pretty sure I'm building the 18sub (updated tall slot port version) because I have a slightly mismatched low end and its a very versatile cabinet, where you can make use of all the xmax your driver has to offer, provided not as efficient. Reflex has more ThD but its very linear and somewhat pleasurable nature, especially in well designed like 18sounds are, but it still has more "distortion" than a horn.  Many like it. This particular cab design seems like a good balance for me, even though I've always been partial to horns they aren't great for the primary listening environment (a studio).

 I was also seriously looking at some tapped horns, it would take over twice as much wood/ply/material for something like the th1821 but less distortion, more efficient. Since you have 6 drivers might spring for something with more coupling, I've been considering building the reflex and then in the future some horn extensions (like levan, infrabass etc) let us know what you decide. I'll have to see which drivers you said you had 


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 26 February 2026 at 6:00pm
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

Sounds sick bro. Venue is always the hard part. Definitely depends on which drivers you are talking, reflex isn't that terrible outdoors for the size, especially if under 100 closer up. maybe not ideal, but sounds like you know what you are doing definitely comes down to the engineer not the design. I am pretty sure I'm building the 18sub (updated tall slot port version) because I have a slightly mismatched low end and its a very versatile cabinet, where you can make use of all the xmax your driver has to offer, provided not as efficient. Reflex has more ThD but its very linear and somewhat pleasurable nature, especially in well designed like 18sounds are, but it still has more "distortion" than a horn.  Many like it. This particular cab design seems like a good balance for me, even though I've always been partial to horns they aren't great for the primary listening environment (a studio).

 I was also seriously looking at some tapped horns, it would take over twice as much wood/ply/material for something like the th1821 but less distortion, more efficient. Since you have 6 drivers might spring for something with more coupling, I've been considering building the reflex and then in the future some horn extensions (like levan, infrabass etc) let us know what you decide. I'll have to see which drivers you said you had 

yeahhh i would love to put these in some staiper mk3's both for like, sonic features/capabilities and just like, a cooler system lol. but then id need to figure out some kicks and then my simple 3 way system with ez processing is now a much more complicated 4 way system so then i lean back towards reflex lol. 

but ye i think (hope) that 6 reflexes in a pile will be healthy for ~100ppl outdoors playing dnb/jungle/dubstep. 


Posted By: Bremen_99
Date Posted: 26 February 2026 at 9:48pm
I'm in the same boat.. about to build 4 reflex and am so tempted to pivot and build some staipers or this "cat40" mykey medium scoop design I found yesterday. But then you need kicks. Also following updates on a skram build journal right now, no kicks needed that is a no compromise bin for sure. I have one HP kick driver and that's good enough for my room lol. If you went for a different design i'd be tempted to build 6 wsx for outdoor in your position (wsx seems like a good match for you driver, maybe?) anyway they look crazy hard to make


Posted By: twosteps
Date Posted: 27 February 2026 at 4:43am
Originally posted by Bremen_99 Bremen_99 wrote:

I'm in the same boat.. about to build 4 reflex and am so tempted to pivot and build some staipers or this "cat40" mykey medium scoop design I found yesterday. But then you need kicks. Also following updates on a skram build journal right now, no kicks needed that is a no compromise bin for sure. I have one HP kick driver and that's good enough for my room lol. If you went for a different design i'd be tempted to build 6 wsx for outdoor in your position (wsx seems like a good match for you driver, maybe?) anyway they look crazy hard to make

ye and i don’t have the transport/storage for wsx’s. 4x minis + kicks or 6 reflexes and the tops i have would be about my current capacity. 



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net