Print Page | Close Window

FF-8000vsVinf8mk2

Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: General
Forum Name: Amp Forum
Forum Description: The 'Stopping Jake Fielder moaning constantly' forum description...
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18438
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 6:55pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: FF-8000vsVinf8mk2
Posted By: Father-Francis
Subject: FF-8000vsVinf8mk2
Date Posted: 21 July 2008 at 7:39pm
http://www.noisecontrolaudio.com/pdfdatasheets/FULL_FREQUENCY.pdf
http://www.voidaudio.com/product_detail.asp?id=31
i know the prices of the voids what do the FF-8000 cost which would be best to run 8 hogs loaded with v18-1000Cry


-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk



Replies:
Posted By: Tedski
Date Posted: 21 July 2008 at 8:55pm
I know what your vans suspension and your back thinks about that LOL


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 21 July 2008 at 9:13pm
Originally posted by Tedski Tedski wrote:

I know what your vans suspension and your back thinks about that LOL


Big%20smileBig%20smile i think they weigh like 100kgs (the hogs)can´t fit them in the van
back to the amps

Big%20smile

-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 21 July 2008 at 10:54pm
do you mean FFA8000? http://fullfataudio.com/ - http://fullfataudio.com/


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 21 July 2008 at 11:00pm
Just save your pennies and buy a new FFA8000..!!! 4k per channel @ 2ohms.. job done,
 
  http://www.sound-services.co.uk/FFA%20datasheet.pdf - http://www.sound-services.co.uk/FFA%20datasheet.pdf
 


Posted By: Marios
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 3:30am
Whats the price on these?


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 5:18am
Originally posted by simo69 simo69 wrote:

do you mean FFA8000? http://fullfataudio.com/ - http://fullfataudio.com/


this is what I was looking at
FF8.0 8KW
Producing up to 4000W per channel and
with ability to really drive 2 Ohm impedance
loads without sacrificing sound quality
Noise Control Audio amplifiers deliver awesome
performance in lightweight standard 2RU
packages. Three amplifier models are available
using high efficiency cool operation Class D
amplifier topology
All FF amplifiers are ideally suited to drive ' 2 Ohm'
loads in the most demanding applications thus giving
best amplifier to loudspeaker ratio. The FF-8.0
offers ultimate low frequency amplification for
specialist high power sub bass systems.
Designed and manufactured in England.


looks like the one you show there but this one´s from
WWW.NOISECONTROLAUDIO.COM
how do they cost?


-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: Phil B
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:10am
Same amp, different faceplates.

Talk to Dave M ( or via the FFA site) on here or give NCA a ring...?
Both will give you a price.

.p.

-------------
Mostly harmless.... except if catering is shut.

Solar Sound System Shennanigans.. http://diyhifi.biz/" rel="nofollow - http://diyhifi.biz/


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:42am
The FF8.0 is identical to FFA-8000 performance wise. They manufacture the FF3.6 FF6.0 FF8.0 for Noise Control Audio as an OEM product. It has a grey front panel and handles with blue leds to match the speakers they make.


Posted By: Peter Moller
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 12:15pm
Originally posted by FAO FAO wrote:

http://www.noisecontrolaudio.com/pdfdatasheets/FULL_FREQUENCY.pdf
http://www.voidaudio.com/product_detail.asp?id=31
i know the prices of the voids what do the FF-8000 cost which would be best to run 8 hogs loaded with v18-1000Cry
 
If you want to try the Inf8V2 - give me a shout - I have got one sitting in my garage near Aarhus..
 
/peter


-------------
real phone no: +45 four zero six two four four nine eight ( using obvious anti phone spam encryption )


Posted By: sKs01
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 1:06pm
well i think a shootout is needed at some point as looking at it on paper the infinite wins, the smps per chanel on the FFA are rated at 10A max, the infinite can draw 32A and is 90% efficient, unless FFA have made some insane level of efficiency from their offering that limited current draw will let it down, peak to peak performance seems to still be gained by the caps not by a massively supped up psu IMO, having only ever seen the specs for the ffa8 though this is nothing more than conjecture so id still like to see a proper dub condition test


-------------
You're a big man, but you're in bad shape. With me it's a full time job. Now behave yourself.


Posted By: Dave M
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 2:32pm
FFA amplifier's output watts are measured rms volts across resistive load  2/4/8 ohms and are not measured peak to peak. Both channels are independant, so when both are driven power performance is not affected when both channels driven simultaneously.
 
All the best
 
Dave


Posted By: SteveAATW
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 3:28pm
Dave, this will probably look like I'm having a go, but as an electrical engineer I do believe this is one area where the lightweight manufacturers do themselves no favours.
 
Can you explain the methodology behind the ratings testing because whichever way you look at it you've got a claim of 4000W (RMS) at 2 ohms on a single channel which is drawing 10A (RMS) from 240V (RMS) mains supply. Thus your apparently turning 2400W into 4000W, which conservation of energy laws would have a few problems with - i.e. its impossible.
 
Is the 4000W continuous, peak, or burst and does it measure 4000W at 30Hz as well as 1KHz. If its burst whats the time constant of the burst and how long does it take to recharge the dc-link?
 
Those of us that know about the ratings know to de-rate some switch mode brands when specifying them, its not a big deal. But if the way the ratings are derived are different to how they've been derived for amps in previous years wouldn't it be wise to add a caveat in the spec sheet explaining this, because you will get people who don't know trying to draw direct comparisons.


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 8:26pm
Originally posted by SteveAATW SteveAATW wrote:

 
 
Can you explain the methodology behind the ratings <snip>


Its all gone quiet ... Confused

But then again, this can be seen in specs for most switchmode/lightweight amps.


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 9:12pm
Interesting??Big%20smile
QSC PL 380

QSC PL 380, Power amp,19"/2HE,

2x 2500W/4 Ohm,
 
2x 1500W/8 Ohm,
 
Shocked2x 4000W/2 Ohm, sym.
 
XLR Inputs, Speakon and Binding-Post Outputs, Gnd-lift, Protections, fan,
11 kg, 35,6cm depth (from front mounting rails)
 
javascript:openPopup%284732,%20prod_bdb_AR_139138.html?image=0,%20870,%20760,%2050,%2050%29;">QSC%20PL%20380


Posted By: SteveAATW
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 9:24pm
QSC do say though in the specs:

Originally posted by QSC QSC wrote:

The amplifier shall be capable of continuous operation at 1/3 of rated power into 4-ohm loads




Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 9:42pm
What about the 4000w per channel continuous?
 
 


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 9:59pm
Originally posted by SteveAATW SteveAATW wrote:

Dave, this will probably look like I'm having a go, but as an electrical engineer I do believe this is one area where the lightweight manufacturers do themselves no favours.
 
Can you explain the methodology behind the ratings testing because whichever way you look at it you've got a claim of 4000W (RMS) at 2 ohms on a single channel which is drawing 10A (RMS) from 240V (RMS) mains supply. Thus your apparently turning 2400W into 4000W, which conservation of energy laws would have a few problems with - i.e. its impossible.
 
Is the 4000W continuous, peak, or burst and does it measure 4000W at 30Hz as well as 1KHz. If its burst whats the time constant of the burst and how long does it take to recharge the dc-link?
 
Those of us that know about the ratings know to de-rate some switch mode brands when specifying them, its not a big deal. But if the way the ratings are derived are different to how they've been derived for amps in previous years wouldn't it be wise to add a caveat in the spec sheet explaining this, because you will get people who don't know trying to draw direct comparisons.


so what is your opinion our learned friend thats all I was looking forCry


-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: Dave M
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:05pm
Steve sorry for the delayed reply, 4000w is allowed at 2 ohm drive sine wave for as long as the mains fuse will allow to protect the amplifier from continued sine wave power testing. The amp is designed to be used with music signals.   Ouput voltage is 95-97Vrms @ 2 Ohms per channel. We use double the capacitance per channel of any of the pro amps manufactured at this time. I don't come from a reggae music back ground but we have good friends who are very successfull in that scene and have put input into our designs plus reggae systems from all over europe have bought our amps are so far very pleased and have re-ordered. 
 
I am pleased there is so much passion with audio and people are searching for the ultimate audio or bass experience!
 
cheers
 
Dave


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:08pm
Dave uses his own amps on his own Funktion-One System.
 
I have heard his system and seen what is powering it 12hrs continual at a time.. faultless quality my friend.
 
Speaks volumes..  so to speak!!! Big%20smile
 


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:21pm
Originally posted by Dave M Dave M wrote:

Steve sorry for the delayed reply, 4000w is allowed at 2 ohm drive sine wave for as long as the mains fuse will allow to protect the amplifier from continued sine wave power testing. The amp is designed to be used with music signals.  


Does that mean the amp won't do 4kw per channel @ 2ohms with a sine wave input?




-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:24pm


Does that mean the amp won't do 4kw per channel @ 2ohms with a sine wave input?

 
Just hire / borrow or buy one and find out.. getting boring now gents.. Smile


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:34pm
Originally posted by simo69 simo69 wrote:

 
Just hire / borrow or buy one and find out.. getting boring now gents.. Smile


Don't believe the question was for you to answer simo.. LOL

Rog was very happy to answer this regarding the Inf8 Mk2. As he had already tested it under these conditions.

The EV P3000 will also perform to spec with sine wave input, so it is not an unreasonable question.Wink


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Tekasis
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:38pm
Originally posted by sKs01 sKs01 wrote:

well i think a shootout is needed at some point as looking at it on paper the infinite wins, the smps per chanel on the FFA are rated at 10A max, the infinite can draw 32A and is 90% efficient, unless FFA have made some insane level of efficiency from their offering that limited current draw will let it down, peak to peak performance seems to still be gained by the caps not by a massively supped up psu IMO, having only ever seen the specs for the ffa8 though this is nothing more than conjecture so id still like to see a proper dub condition test
 
I agree too - Clash them! LOL
 
Once & for all. It's been long overdue!
 
While your at it, fling a JTS UA up there Wink
 


-------------
**Heavy Weight-Line**
A home without books is like a body with no soul.


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:42pm
Originally posted by Tekasis Tekasis wrote:

Originally posted by sKs01 sKs01 wrote:

well i think a shootout is needed at some point as looking at it on paper the infinite wins, the smps per chanel on the FFA are rated at 10A max, the infinite can draw 32A and is 90% efficient, unless FFA have made some insane level of efficiency from their offering that limited current draw will let it down, peak to peak performance seems to still be gained by the caps not by a massively supped up psu IMO, having only ever seen the specs for the ffa8 though this is nothing more than conjecture so id still like to see a proper dub condition test
 
I agree too - Clash them! LOL
 
Once & for all. It's been long overdue!
 
While your at it, fling a JTS UA up there Wink
 


I was thinking of gettin one of each and test them myself.


-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:44pm
Ouch.. that hurt...Sleepy


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:48pm
Originally posted by simo69 simo69 wrote:

Ouch.. that hurt...Sleepy

think about it no one here I know is like doing this cost me money to get there
hotel and thing might as well buy two ampsTongue


-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:51pm
yeh, it is a shame ya live so far away...CrySmile


Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 10:56pm
true I´ll try make some big event later this yearSmileSmile

-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: sKs01
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:02pm
even with a couple of farads of caps on the input, if your really ragging the amp an a heavy duty cycle they'll empty, if the psu doesn't support the power required youll loose power over time, for me ill take a back breaking (though thats a cost issue as much as anything)  one day proberably quite soon smps will be able to deal with the silly amounts of power needed for ridiculous duty cycle music at 2r but i dont think today is the day, and caps don't make up for the fact imo (10A inputs are usefull in most cases but dub isn't most cases)


-------------
You're a big man, but you're in bad shape. With me it's a full time job. Now behave yourself.


Posted By: andyamp
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:20pm
Hi every one, the duty cycle (average)powere of audio when driven music into a loudspeaker is approxamatly 30% off rms power.
as music is made of dynamic information,it is true that the dynamic power is what matters.
However i get to see and test a lot of amplifiers.
the amps that can realy do rms power are the ones that do the biz.
There are not many of them.Question
any one is welcome to come here and have there amp tested.
providing they are prepaired for a disapointment in most cases.
 
Don't bother with bringing the FFA8 to me as It is the most powerful UK made amplifier out there.StarClap
I have held that position for 8 years untill the FFA8Star
if any one has a uk made amp that they recon can chalange my xp3k for the 2nd biggest uk amp please bring it to me for testing.
and post the test resaults.Cool
 
a 10amp slow blow fuse will take the full power when playing music as this sort of fuse will take peak's of about twice the continus current.
I am working on my next f-off big ampLOL
and maybe regain the No1 spot.
 
Hug


-------------
a wise man changes his mind a fool does not.
http://www.matrixamplification.com/ - http://www.matrixamplification.com/


Posted By: Mark James
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:22pm
so you rate the ffa then andy? 

-------------
insert silly sentence here


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:28pm
Originally posted by sKs01 sKs01 wrote:

even with a couple of farads of caps on the input, if your really ragging the amp an a heavy duty cycle they'll empty, if the psu doesn't support the power required youll loose power over time,


Example of an amp  performing to specs. Wink

http://speakerplans.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=14937&PN=1 - http://speakerplans.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=14937&PN=1

Originally posted by Rog Mogale Rog Mogale wrote:


Varoius frequencies were tested but both amps can put out the same from 20Hz up to 20KHz, so 50Hz sine wave was use for all testing.


Originally posted by Rog Mogale Rog Mogale wrote:


Next the Infinite 7 v2 bridged into 4 ohms. It gave 140.7 volts which is 4713 watts or 2356 watts per channel. Again if the load was excatly 4 ohms the output would be 4949 watts or 2474 watts per channel. Its specs sheet says 2450 per channel into 2 ohms, so its doing better that its specs say.
 



Dont think we need to summon Inf8Mk2 for this, Inf 7 Mk2 should be good enough comparison. Sine wave or Dub Test.Wink


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: SteveAATW
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:32pm
In terms of British amps MC2 E45 has been on the market for years?

It's fused at 20A and seen it pull a fair bit more, its claimed 2R ratings are a bit suspect for any length of time but its 4R ones are bang on the money from what i can tell

Not dissing the lightweights by any stretch of the imagination, they do a sterling job, but their spec sheets don't add up a lot of the time


Posted By: andyamp
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:49pm
Hi steve
E45 is no3 on the test bench. (UK made)amplifiers
Steve you are quite correct about its ratings i have tested it.LOL
 
The inf 8 by the way is more powerfull than the xp.
i did develop it to be pic up able
and as i have posted before the INF8 is the only amp to exceed the power meters on my dummy load.
i have to build a bigger dummy load
I donot know which amp would win on power,but soud is a different matterCensored
you will have to find outClap
 


-------------
a wise man changes his mind a fool does not.
http://www.matrixamplification.com/ - http://www.matrixamplification.com/


Posted By: andyamp
Date Posted: 22 July 2008 at 11:55pm
mark I rate them both,Thumbs%20Up
for different thingsHug
they are both more powerfull than my xp.Cry
but the next big amp i do will have to sound better than the INF8 and be lighter than the FFA
and then i will be happy and, speakers will need to be made bigger.
 
 


-------------
a wise man changes his mind a fool does not.
http://www.matrixamplification.com/ - http://www.matrixamplification.com/


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 12:14am
Originally posted by andyamp andyamp wrote:

Don't bother with bringing the FFA8 to me as It is the most powerful UK made amplifier out there.


I'll believe that when I see sine wave measurements at 4ohm bridge, and hear it outplay Inf8 Mk2, with 4x cabs a side with "Sub heavy material". Wink




-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: sKs01
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 12:19am
@ lev infinite 8 isn't British built though is it? (i thought it was built in china?)



-------------
You're a big man, but you're in bad shape. With me it's a full time job. Now behave yourself.


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 1:08am
Originally posted by sKs01 sKs01 wrote:

@ lev infinite 8 isn't British built though is it? (i thought it was built in china?)


British Designed, warranty and repairs will be done in England, good enough for me.

Dont think you'll find any "British Built amp", completely built and assembled in Britain. It would cost too much.

They will have some boards made in China, and final assembly in England.

So that "British built" doesn't really mean much.


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Dave M
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 8:51am
Hi levyte - unfortunately for us we do completely assemble and manufacture our amps in England. This includes all metal work, magnetics and pcb population.
 
Our amps are not bridgable as we have individual 2 power supplies.
All the best
 
Dave
 
 


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 9:38am
Originally posted by Dave M Dave M wrote:

Hi levyte - unfortunately for us we do completely assemble and manufacture our amps in England. This includes all metal work, magnetics and pcb population.
 
Well respect to that, must cost a pretty penny though. 
 
Anyway, shall we have a clash of the titans, or just say FFA8 and Inf8 Mk2 are jolly good amps.. LOL
 
 


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Deadbeat
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 10:04am
So, in the purple corner, the FFA 8000
And in the blue corner, the Void Infinate 8 Mk2.

Music test and a 'scientific beard stroking' test (for completeness, please...).  No bridging cos the FFA is a dual monoblock...Sounds like a great one for the records. LOL Just speculation, I only have access to a Void Inf 8 if I chase it up, but if one of you guys decides to do this, please put up the results, i'm sure we'd all like to see. Besides, I'm almost never in the UK.

@andy

Sounds like a challenge - 5000-10000W in 1U...a British Digam K-eater.


-------------
Away on extended leave.


Posted By: Dave M
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 10:05am
jolly good amps is fine for me though if you have a gig i would happy to come and see you so you can have a listen.
 
cheers
 
Dave


Posted By: Timebomb
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 12:46pm
Originally posted by andyamp andyamp wrote:

Hi every one, the duty cycle (average)powere of audio when driven music into a loudspeaker is approxamatly 30% off rms power.
as music is made of dynamic information,it is true that the dynamic power is what matters.
However i get to see and test a lot of amplifiers.
the amps that can realy do rms power are the ones that do the biz.
There are not many of them.Question
any one is welcome to come here and have there amp tested.
providing they are prepaired for a disapointment in most cases.
 
Don't bother with bringing the FFA8 to me as It is the most powerful UK made amplifier out there.StarClap
I have held that position for 8 years untill the FFA8Star
if any one has a uk made amp that they recon can chalange my xp3k for the 2nd biggest uk amp please bring it to me for testing.
and post the test resaults.Cool
 
a 10amp slow blow fuse will take the full power when playing music as this sort of fuse will take peak's of about twice the continus current.
I am working on my next f-off big ampLOL
and maybe regain the No1 spot.
 
Hug


Sounds good, is this next amp of yours going to run off 2 separate power inputs Andy?  How far along is it?


-------------
James Secker          facebook.com/soundgearuk
James@soundgear.co.uk               www.soundgear.co.uk


Posted By: imageoven
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 12:56pm
When does one amp with two power supplies become two amps that share a case? not that it really matters...

Oh and well done everyone for having an informed, usefull and polite discussion!


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 1:34pm
I'm guessing the FFA8 is bridged internally (H bridge output) so you can't bridge it again
It's also the easiest way to deal with potential "power supply pumping" issues which class D amps can suffer from
 
I've heard both amps (FFA8 and inf8 v2)  in the same venue on the same stack / preamp / tune and there wasn't that much in it


Posted By: toastyghost
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 2:13pm
Originally posted by mskeete mskeete wrote:

I'm guessing the FFA8 is bridged internally (H bridge output) so you can't bridge it again
It's also the easiest way to deal with potential "power supply pumping" issues which class D amps can suffer from
 
I've heard both amps (FFA8 and inf8 v2)  in the same venue on the same stack / preamp / tune and there wasn't that much in it


So are you saying one is better than the other sonically but not by much, or just that it comes down to whether you want to spend the extra to save your back?Wink


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 2:37pm
was only on bass, not a full range test
There was a difference between the amps - not sure how to describe it really (it was a while ago) and you could probably make one sound like the other with a bit of EQ but I would be happy owning either amp (subject to price)
 
Still don;t let me put anyone off doing a shootout and doing measurements


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 2:46pm
Originally posted by Deadbeat Deadbeat wrote:

So, in the purple corner, the FFA 8000
And in the blue corner, the Void Infinate 8 Mk2.

Music test and a 'scientific beard stroking' test (for completeness, please...).  No bridging
 
http://www.speakerplans.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=15897&PN=13 - http://www.speakerplans.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=15897&PN=13
 
Originally posted by Biotec Biotec wrote:

I have confidence in it and would love to save my back with its weight but it wont be replacing my heavy amps until I have compared it like for like with my existing heavy amps.  I'm not comparing it to china watts, prolines, peavys or budget amps. It will be playing the toughest speakers you can put on the end of an amp playing 80Hz down to 30Hz and will be up against 2 of the best sub amps you can buy.  It wont be playing sine waves with measurement mics and beard stroking, I will be comparing it on real sub heavy music.
 
Probably the best quote this year. LOL


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: biotec
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 3:10pm
The last part I feel is a valid point lev. On several occasions you have brought up the fact that the FFA only has 20a fuses/cables (and so can't suply 8000w continuously) but this doesn't matter at all because on real music you won't ever be able to exceed this for long enough for it to be a problem. If a 4000w FFA can produce more power than a 3700w void on real music, then it doesn't bother me that the void can play a sin wave for longer before burning the protective fuse.

-------------
me so horny, me love you long throw.


Posted By: imageoven
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 3:18pm
Originally posted by mskeete mskeete wrote:

I'm guessing the FFA8 is bridged internally (H bridge output) so you can't bridge it again


Does this (if it is the case) still allow stereo operation?


Posted By: levyte357
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 3:39pm
Originally posted by biotec biotec wrote:

The last part I feel is a valid point lev. On several occasions you have brought up the fact that the FFA only has 20a fuses/cables (and so can't suply 8000w continuously) but this doesn't matter at all because on real music you won't ever be able to exceed this for long enough for it to be a problem. If a 4000w FFA can produce more power than a 3700w void on real music, then it doesn't bother me that the void can play a sin wave for longer before burning the protective fuse.
 
Valid point.
 
I guess I'm a bit biased, because of the long list of dissapointing amps I have heard, or amps people have told me about,  and then find contradicting specifications told the story all along.
 
Then Void Inf Mk2 series comes along, with specs that add up, published amp test with sine wave, and also few well known soundsystems belting the amps regularly.
 
Understandably, FFA amps cost more because they are newer technology and are made in UK, but will inevitably be subject to closer scrutiny, because of the price.
 


-------------
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".


Posted By: Jhodas
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 4:03pm
I've heard both in the same room, but with different drivers hanging off them.

The FFA was King Shiloh's pushing 8 (i think) Volts.
The Void was Irations, pushing those turbos.

Neither system was wanting for power. I think if you did a scientific listening test (same speaker, linear mic etc) there would be about 1dB in it, which is pretty much imperceptible at those levels.

I must say I was sceptical about the FFA until I heard Shiloh spanking one.
It's a serious piece of amp, make no mistake.


-------------
Until the Lions have their own historians, tales of hunting will always glorify the hunter.


Posted By: rich21
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 4:13pm
i have heard the FFA amps many times at notting hill driving a shed load of F1 (David /Jason at the controls) and i have always been impressed by the sound, clean defined and never sounds like the amps have run out of stream.
i have ordered a couple of 8's should have them in about a week i will let you know what i think compared to the MA5000 playing music (a sine wave test maybe fun but thats not how i will be using them)
i have no doubt that i will be happy and my back may last a couple more years Approve


Posted By: SteveAATW
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 4:25pm
Originally posted by biotec biotec wrote:

The last part I feel is a valid point lev. On several occasions you have brought up the fact that the FFA only has 20a fuses/cables (and so can't suply 8000w continuously) but this doesn't matter at all because on real music you won't ever be able to exceed this for long enough for it to be a problem. If a 4000w FFA can produce more power than a 3700w void on real music, then it doesn't bother me that the void can play a sin wave for longer before burning the protective fuse.


Agree with Lev, completely valid point, but by the same token, don't put 4000W in the spec sheet when it can't do it for more than a few seconds at best.

Dave didn't reply directly to the question but it is a similar facet of most lightweight spec sheets, the numbers don't add up and it is not stated as to why. If it is the fact that music is has a duty cylce of around 1/3 the RMS rated power, or that the amp is burst rated then thats all well and good but state it on the sheet in large font clear, non tech speak, plain English. We know and are not disputing these amps can do a bloody good job. But given that they perform and are known to perform, why do people attempt to sex up the spec sheets, presumably just to chase numbers that marketing people want?

I know there's no BS or ISO standard for testing audio amplifiers, but by the same token these amps are being designed by some clearly very clever people, who will know that you can't pluck energy out of thin air and given they are being sold to a professional market who equally aren't stupid, it makes a lot of users think twice about what these amps can actually do. Lightweights have a bad rep in some circles and at best unexplained and at worst ficticious numbers on spec sheets do their cause no good whatsoever.


Posted By: andyamp
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 4:32pm
like that steveLOL
and i get to test them

-------------
a wise man changes his mind a fool does not.
http://www.matrixamplification.com/ - http://www.matrixamplification.com/


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 5:08pm
Originally posted by imageoven imageoven wrote:

Originally posted by mskeete mskeete wrote:

I'm guessing the FFA8 is bridged internally (H bridge output) so you can't bridge it again


Does this (if it is the case) still allow stereo operation?
 
Yes, 4 output stages - 2 bridged for each channel


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 5:10pm
Originally posted by Jhodas Jhodas wrote:

I've heard both in the same room, but with different drivers hanging off them.

The FFA was King Shiloh's pushing 8 (i think) Volts.
The Void was Irations, pushing those turbos.

Neither system was wanting for power. I think if you did a scientific listening test (same speaker, linear mic etc) there would be about 1dB in it, which is pretty much imperceptible at those levels.

I must say I was sceptical about the FFA until I heard Shiloh spanking one.
It's a serious piece of amp, make no mistake.
 
Best I heard was shiloh using 1 channel of a FFA on 3 scoops


Posted By: simo69
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 5:23pm
mskeete -- your private messenger is full


Posted By: norty303
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 6:35pm
Quote David Jason at the controls
 
was this Trotters Independant Sound Co, Peckham?


-------------
My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 6:35pm

I've made some space



Posted By: Father-Francis
Date Posted: 23 July 2008 at 7:38pm
Originally posted by andyamp andyamp wrote:

Hi every one, the duty cycle (average)powere of audio when driven music into a loudspeaker is approxamatly 30% off rms power.
as music is made of dynamic information,it is true that the dynamic power is what matters.
However i get to see and test a lot of amplifiers.
the amps that can realy do rms power are the ones that do the biz.
There are not many of them.Question
any one is welcome to come here and have there amp tested.
providing they are prepaired for a disapointment in most cases.
 
Don't bother with bringing the FFA8 to me as It is the most powerful UK made amplifier out there.StarClap
I have held that position for 8 years untill the FFA8Star
if any one has a uk made amp that they recon can chalange my xp3k for the 2nd biggest uk amp please bring it to me for testing.
and post the test resaults.Cool
 
a 10amp slow blow fuse will take the full power when playing music as this sort of fuse will take peak's of about twice the continus current.
I am working on my next f-off big ampLOL
and maybe regain the No1 spot.
 
Hug


Andy you know your sh´´t so I´l take your word,Big%20smileConfused


-------------
Music is the strongest form of magic.(+45 31879997)blakmanpro@gmail.com, foa@sweetboxaudio.dk


Posted By: Peter Moller
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 12:36am
Originally posted by SteveAATW SteveAATW wrote:

 
I know there's no BS or ISO standard for testing audio amplifiers, but by the same token these amps are being designed by some clearly very clever people, who will know that you can't pluck energy out of thin air and given they are being sold to a professional market who equally aren't stupid, it makes a lot of users think twice about what these amps can actually do. Lightweights have a bad rep in some circles and at best unexplained and at worst ficticious numbers on spec sheets do their cause no good whatsoever.
 
Since that 911 thing its been pretty hard getting uranium for civilian purposes, so those light weight amps just dont  perform as well as they used to :-)
 
Re: standardised test procedures:
There was an old DIN standard ( Deutsche Industrie Norm ) that involved driving the amp to near clip ( 1% distortion ) with a sinewave.. This norm also dictated that the amp should be able to deliver full power for atleast 30 minutes..
 
IIRC: Crown used a similar FTC standard
 
I prefer the sinewave test as its relatively simple and easy to reproduce with relatively basic lab equipment..
 
My method involves a 1K sine generator, a scope and a dummyload..
Turn up the gain until the amp starts clipping, then back it down to a point where clipping is not visible on the scope.. leave it running for a few minutes to allow the amp to heat up a bit, then measure the peak to peak voltage and do a bit of math:
 
Vpp*SQR2 = Vrms
RMS output power = Vrms^2 / Rdummy
 
Example: Measure 141V PP on a 4 ohm dummyload
Vrms= 100V
output power is 10000/4 = 2500W RMS
 
A 20-20K sweep should show no notable drop in output voltage..
 
Run the amp hot and repeat the test..
 
/peter
 
 
 


-------------
real phone no: +45 four zero six two four four nine eight ( using obvious anti phone spam encryption )


Posted By: RiddimKid
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 2:22am

How much are these amps new ?



Posted By: imageoven
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 8:59am
Originally posted by mskeete mskeete wrote:

Originally posted by imageoven imageoven wrote:

Originally posted by mskeete mskeete wrote:

I'm guessing the FFA8 is bridged internally (H bridge output) so you can't bridge it again


Does this (if it is the case) still allow stereo operation?
 
Yes, 4 output stages - 2 bridged for each channel


Ah ok, so its 4 amps in one box sharing two power supplies! and the inf. 8 is two amps in one box sharing one power supply.

Was it the chevin A6000 which they stopped making as a stereo, 2 power supply unit and it became the mb4000 (? don't think thats quite right) which was the A6000 cut in half to make a mono, single powersupply  version?

edit; its a mb3000 not mb4000


Posted By: Mark James
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 9:13am
Originally posted by RiddimKid RiddimKid wrote:

How much are these amps new ?

call pap for a guid price on the infinite8



-------------
insert silly sentence here


Posted By: SteveAATW
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 10:08am
Originally posted by imageoven imageoven wrote:

Ah ok, so its 4 amps in one box sharing two power supplies! and the inf. 8 is two amps in one box sharing one power supply.

Was it the chevin A6000 which they stopped making as a stereo, 2 power supply unit and it became the mb4000 (? don't think thats quite right) which was the A6000 cut in half to make a mono, single powersupply  version?


As far as I know the FFA amps are class D, which means the topology is very different to that of the Infinite - you can't compare the two directly. Whilst you could make 2 separate, half-bridge class D amps out of a H-bridge, the FFA-8000 probably uses h-bridges to get the power up as high as it does, thus has probably been designed as a dual h-bridge amp in the first instance rather than being 4 amps stuck together.


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 10:34am
that's what I was saying (two ouput stages (not 2 amps) = 1 h bridge)
Anyone got a picture of the inside of a FFA 8000?


Posted By: tweeter box
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 11:19am
Originally posted by andyamp andyamp wrote:

Hi every one, the duty cycle (average)powere of audio when driven music into a loudspeaker is approxamatly 30% off rms power.
as music is made of dynamic information,it is true that the dynamic power is what matters.
However i get to see and test a lot of amplifiers.
the amps that can realy do rms power are the ones that do the biz.
There are not many of them.Question
any one is welcome to come here and have there amp tested.
providing they are prepaired for a disapointment in most cases.
 
Don't bother with bringing the FFA8 to me as It is the most powerful UK made amplifier out there.StarClap
I have held that position for 8 years untill the FFA8Star
if any one has a uk made amp that they recon can chalange my xp3k for the 2nd biggest uk amp please bring it to me for testing.
and post the test resaults.Cool
 
a 10amp slow blow fuse will take the full power when playing music as this sort of fuse will take peak's of about twice the continus current.
I am working on my next f-off big ampLOL
and maybe regain the No1 spot.
 
Hug
 
ANdy have you tested a JTS amp yet?


-------------
PRECISION SOUND SYSTEM.

Feeding the peoples needs for Roots Music.

Strictly premium grade reggae and dub steppers from the early 70's to present day.


Posted By: SteveAATW
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 12:28pm
Originally posted by mskeete mskeete wrote:

that's what I was saying (two ouput stages (not 2 amps) = 1 h bridge)
Anyone got a picture of the inside of a FFA 8000?


By same token though it could just be one output stage thats a h-bridge by design. People only normally use half-bridges because its cheaper. Be interesting to see if anyone starts using cascaded h-bridges to increase the resolution and decrease the filter sizes in these amps in the future.


Posted By: mskeete
Date Posted: 24 July 2008 at 5:01pm
OK, a H-bridge is one output stage but I always think of it as two Half bridge stages coupled together (subject to how the filter is done) hence my previous comments
 
I Think designs already exist (complicated / overkill) that use output stages running in different phases (so to speak) so that each output stage is switching at a frequency that is lower than the frequency seen by the output filter
 
Crowns BCA runs at 250Khz but has an effective switching frequency of double that (along with it's own issues) IIRC
 
Still, I think self osscilating designs with post filter feedback are the way forward
They already exist and are meant to sound pretty good



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net