Punisher II
Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Plans
Forum Name: Punisher and X-tro
Forum Description: Discussion / Questions about the Punisher and X-tro
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1912
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 7:10pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Punisher II
Posted By: Contour
Subject: Punisher II
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 6:37am
|
Since the introduction of the Punisher horn Ciare has developed a new model 12.00SW driver with even more powerhandling than the 2004 model. But this is at the expense of extra depth of the chassis. When mounting the 2005 model in the Punisher there is very little clearance behind the magnet vent.
With a few days there will be an new set of plans available on www.speakerstore.nl for the new Punisher II design which is designed for the Caire 12.00SW 2005 version.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Replies:
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 6:59am
|
that's just great
awaiting plans
------------- general manager & head designer at nexus-acoustics research http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research
Ex Nexus_3
|
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 7:44am
|
Well, I think this was something I actually had to do. The Ciare 12.00SW 2004 version fits in the Punisher I quite well. But the 2005 version has a deeper frame so that way it became a very tight fit with little room behind the magnet vent.
The Punisher II has solved this problem. Also I changed a few other small things such as an extra reinforcement panel in the backchamber nose.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 7:50am
|
will there be some CAD plans to help us cut the Plywood easier, and with more precision?
how many people would a system with 2 punisher + 1 X-tro / side cover?
Don't forget to take into account the grill & foam that must fit onto the front of the cabinet, because the first plans didn't.
------------- general manager & head designer at nexus-acoustics research http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research
Ex Nexus_3
|
Posted By: Lyndon A
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 9:09am
|
How many watts RMS will the new 2005 driver take? Fingers crossed we will start building ours soon.
|
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 10:13am
|
Hello,
In the new plans for the Punisher I again did not plan for a grill and foam. I wanted to keep the outer dimensions of the Punisher the same. In fact the changes to the Punisher I are small. They are detail improvements needed for the Ciare model 2005 driver.
A system with 2x Punisher + 1x X-tro would cover up to 400-500 people. But that all depend on how loud you need the music to be.
For the 2005 driver mounted in the Punisher I still think 1500W is about as optimal as it can get. It should be enough to really move the Ciare cone. If you put in even more power most of that will turn into heat. Just as with the LAB-horn LAB-12 drivers there comes a point where they simply just start to fall apart.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: Jez_Ultra
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 4:47pm
hey Nexus_3 just add whatever you want to the depth of the sides,
bottom and top panels to allow for a grill etc. Its hardly rocket
science.
|
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 5:03pm
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 6:15pm
|
Plans for Punisher II are ready:
http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=nl&pg=11&c=21 - http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=nl&pg=11&c=21
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: efreak
Date Posted: 24 May 2005 at 10:11pm
|
thanks Walt, I have finished 2 punishers already and plan to start building 2 more tomorrow. Thank you for your hard work on the punisher. Its is an awsome horn and i cant wait to hear my stack of 4 once finished :)
a.j
|
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 25 May 2005 at 5:11am
|
Hello Efreak,
The effect of two punishers stacked compared to a single one is large. Also going from 2 to 4 is a big difference. You really notice the coupling effect.
Please use the new set of construction drawings as can be found at the http://www.speakerstore.nl - www.speakerstore.nl site. I don't know if you are using Ciare 2005 or 2004 driver but with an eye on the future (if you might ever need to install a new driver) it would be wise to build the Punisher II version. Outer dimensions are all the same. There is some difference in horn mouth however so you cabinets will look a bit different. Punisher II will allow for a somewhat better cooling of the Ciare driver due to a little more free space behind the magnet vent.
The 2004 12.00SW version has a 4 spoke basket
The 2005 12.00SW version has a 8 spoke basket
Pictures of both driver can be seen on the speakerstore site.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: efreak
Date Posted: 25 May 2005 at 3:15pm
|
Yes i have the 2005 model Ciare. I built the first 2 punishers from the original Punisher design therefore i may also build the next 2 from the same design so they will be the same, when stacked in 4. I also have the Cad plans for the first design which makes the build easy. Maybe i will build 4 more punisher II as soon as the cad plans become available!!
When i stack my first 2 punisher horns together they sound very nice. This is why i must build another 2.

|
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 25 May 2005 at 5:07pm
|
Thank you for the picture! Very nice to hear you are happy with the design.
You are using front loaded cabinets for the mid/high section. In that case it is best to delay these top cabinet with 2.3 metres so that the sound from the Punisher and tops arrives at your ear at the same time. In that case the efficiency in the crossover range is optimal.
I am working on a cut list for all panels of the Punisher II. That should be helpful in the construction proces. What do you mean with CAD plans? The construction plans at:
http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=en&pg=11&p=sp&c=21&prjID - http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=en&pg=11&p=sp &c=21&prjID =
are already changed. These are the plans for the Punisher II.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 25 May 2005 at 5:22pm
|
Contour wrote:
What do you mean with CAD plans |
I think he made CAD plans that help him cut every panel to the ideal dimension like those on the selenium website.
------------- general manager & head designer at nexus-acoustics research http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research
Ex Nexus_3
|
Posted By: efreak
Date Posted: 25 May 2005 at 6:42pm
Contour wrote:
Thank you for the picture! Very nice to hear you are happy with the design.
You are using front loaded cabinets for the mid/high section. In that case it is best to delay these top cabinet with 2.3 metres so that the sound from the Punisher and tops arrives at your ear at the same time. In that case the efficiency in the crossover range is optimal.
I am working on a cut list for all panels of the Punisher II. That should be helpful in the construction proces. What do you mean with CAD plans? The construction plans at:
http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=en&pg=11&p=sp&c=21&prjID - http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=en&pg=11&p=sp &c=21&prjID =
are already changed. These are the plans for the Punisher II.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Thank you for your kind words and help Walt. By cad i mean a cut/angle for each board which is really helpfull. If you will have a cut sheet for the punishers II then i will wait and only cut my sides, top & bottom, and baffle for now just to have some of the boards ready since they will remain the same.
Also i will purchase a driverack soon to handle the delay as you speak of..
|
Posted By: tb_mike
Date Posted: 25 May 2005 at 8:20pm
Walt: Youl be aware that I agree with your design idea with the punisher.
What is your opinion of the heating effect in the small rear chamber?
Is it substantial or not worrying? Im interested in any papers on this
subject.
Also im interested in the subsonic filtering action of the sealed rear chamber-and 2HD caused by its tiny volume
http://www.woodartistry.com/linkwitzlab/images/graphics/ai r-distortn.gif
Cheers
|
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 28 May 2005 at 5:58pm
|
have you ever used the 8 ohm version of the ciare driver or only the 4 ohm? I don't have T/S for the 4 ohm version, are they the same except, re, le, Bl
What I'm triyng to say is: will the 8 ohm driver sound the same as the 4 ohm one?
I don't know which one I can get my hands on, here in Romania (if I can )
------------- general manager & head designer at nexus-acoustics research http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research
Ex Nexus_3
|
Posted By: tb_mike
Date Posted: 29 May 2005 at 1:27am
Nexus_3 wrote:
have you ever used the 8 ohm version of the ciare driver or only the 4 ohm? I don't have T/S for the 4 ohm version, are they the same except, re, le, Bl
What I'm triyng to say is: will the 8 ohm driver sound the same as the 4 ohm one?
I don't know which one I can get my hands on, here in Romania (if I can )
|
I bet,that theres no audible difference. Be aware that BL depends on Re,so it will appear different,but it must be the same because the horn is exactly the same,and BL affects the horn alot.
|
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 29 May 2005 at 4:14am
I am aware of certain parameters being automaticly different ,
are they the same except, re, le, Bl |
------------- general manager & head designer at nexus-acoustics research http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research
Ex Nexus_3
|
Posted By: tb_mike
Date Posted: 29 May 2005 at 10:01pm
|
Nexus_3 wrote:
I am aware of certain parameters being automaticly different ,
are they the same except, re, le, Bl |
|
Obviously Re and Le are different(double or half),but that matters little to the horn. I cant remember how BL changes with differing impedence of voice coil...simply because the drivers I see are generally one or the other
|
Posted By: Mircea Bartic
Date Posted: 30 May 2005 at 4:44am
does anybody have the T/S for trhe 4 ohm version of ciare 12.00SW so I can simulate the two and answer the question myself?
------------- general manager & head designer at nexus-acoustics research http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research" rel="nofollow - http://www.facebook.com/nexus.acoustics.research
Ex Nexus_3
|
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 30 May 2005 at 7:41am
|
You can find the T/S for the 4 ohm version over here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hofmanpa/index.html - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hofmanpa/index.html
Unfortunatly this site doesn't allow for direct linking so you have to look in the speaker section yourself.
There will be very small changes in response but you can say both 4 and 8 ohm version give about the same result. So far I have only heard the 4 ohm version.
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: _djk_
Date Posted: 30 May 2005 at 8:01pm
|
BL is a red herring.
The correct formula for comparing woofer drive force is BL^2/Re
------------- djk
|
Posted By: Contour
Date Posted: 31 May 2005 at 5:20am
|
The Punisher II cutsheet is ready, you can find it as a Word document at:
http://www.speakerstore.nl - www.speakerstore.nl
ATTENTION: the measurement on panel 9 should be 27.47cm!
Best regards,
Walt
|
Posted By: Timber_MG
Date Posted: 31 May 2005 at 7:14am
|
or BL/sqrt(Re) (depending on whom you read)
|
Posted By: Lyndon A
Date Posted: 31 May 2005 at 11:15am
Posted By: _djk_
Date Posted: 31 May 2005 at 8:24pm
|
"or BL/sqrt(Re) (depending on whom you read) "
Gives the same relative ranking, but my method uses fewer keystrokes and can be used with a four function calculator.
Whatever you're comfortable with.
------------- djk
|
|