Hd15 - Beyma 15LX60 loading
Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Plans
Forum Name: HD 15 horn
Forum Description: Discussion / Questions about the HD 15 horn
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2312
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 8:37am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Hd15 - Beyma 15LX60 loading
Posted By: norty303
Subject: Hd15 - Beyma 15LX60 loading
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 9:37am
|
Has anyone tried this or modelled it?
Just looking through the T/S parameters and it looks like they should be good however i'm probably missing some major point here. The PD154 is considered to be a great driver in these and the LX60 looks better in a lot of areas.
PD154
| Fs |
39 Hz |
| Xmax |
6.5 mm |
| Revc |
6.2 Ohms |
| Vd |
5.78 x10-4 m3 |
| Qts |
0.205 |
| No |
3.94% |
| Qms |
4.32 |
| Pmx |
500 Watts |
| Qes |
0.216 |
| Cms |
133 µM/N |
| Vas |
149 Litres |
| Mms |
125 grams |
| Sd |
890 sq cm |
| BL |
29.65 T/m |
Beyma 15LX60
Resonant Frequency, fs 35 Hz
D.C. Voice Coil Resistance, Re 5.5 ohms.
Mechanical Quality Factor, Qms 8.7
Electrical Quality Factor, Qes 0.36
Total Quality Factor, Qts 0.35
Equivalent Air Volume to Cms, Vas 215 l
Mechanical Compliance, Cms 175 µm/N
Mechanical Resistance, Rms 2.9 kg/s
Efficiency, ço (%) 2.3
Effective Surface Area, Sd (m 2) 0.091 m2
Maximum Displacement, Xmax 9 mm.
Displacement Volume, Vd 820 cm.3
Voice Coil Inductance, Le @ 1kHz 1.2 mH
------------- My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers
|
Replies:
Posted By: ben influence
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 5:27pm
shouldn't it have a low qts and high bl to work in a horn?
pd 154:
qts - 0.205
bl - 29.65
15LX60
qts - 0.35
bl - 20.35
?
Ben
|
Posted By: norty303
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 5:41pm
Yeah, but its not strictly a horn is it, that's why i'm curious, and the LX series are supposed to be good in BP boxes
------------- My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers
|
Posted By: rastaman
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 5:56pm
Probably, but then there's the whole, it's not really a horn, it's a
horn bandpass cab. Whats the rule a true horn has to be at least a
quarter of the lowest wavelength it's trying to produce (path length
from driver to mouth) I think.
Pulling stuff out the FAQ:
Rog wrote:
With short folded horns, or bandpass horns like the HD15 the effect is
even more pronounced. A short folded horn with horn length of around 85
cm and a mouth area of 3300 sq cm, so a horn with an 85 Hz cutoff (quarter
space) will sound really hard with high EBP drivers in them. The PD 1850
will rip your head of in one of these bins, but lower EBP drivers (though
not as low as the PD 186) will smooth the sound out and make it more
listenable.
|
Rog wrote:
Drivers like the PD 184 will work in a short folded horn because the cab
is not really a horn. For the driver to be properly loaded by a horn
means a horn length of over 5.5 feet, something none of the Turbo or
Funktion bins have. When the horn is less than 5.5 feet long we have
what I call a horn assisted design. Basically the horn just adds a bit
of gain from around 80 to 150 Hz, the cab will produce notes above and
below these frequencies, just at a lower volume. You want a driver with
a low resonance a powerful motor system and good damping, the PD 184 has
all of these. Most of my short horn designs will work down to 50 Hz
because I design them to be sealed boxes first that just have a bit of
extra gain and kick from the horn in the 80 to 150 Hz range. Below the
horn cutoff most of these short horns will still produce a useful output
down to the cutoff point of the sealed box |
So it looks like there may be some middle ground, but the Beyman may
not be in it. That said, the rule of thump was below 0.28 Qts for a 18"
driver, but that may not hold for a 15" driver, you'd expect a higher
Qts (I think).
The Kappa Pro 15 LF has a Qts of 0.31 and a BL of 20.36
Fane Colossus 15XB has a Qts of 0.32 and a BL of 37
The JBL E-140 has a Qts of 0.17 and I can't be bothered to calculate
the BL, check the spec sheet here
http://www.jblpro.com/pages/pub/components/eseries.pdf - http://www.jblpro.com/pages/pub/components/eseries.pdf
Looks like the Beyma maybe just inside the ballpark for BL, but just
outside it for Qts. Don't forget though driver specs are never
absolute. Suck it and see when it's close I suppose.
It may even be with a bandpass horn whatever it actually is, the
parameters required change, it's got a nice low resonance, and an
average BL and below average Qts.
|
Posted By: norty303
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 6:04pm
|
Yeah, it was just a thought as i can get them cheap and PD are out of stock of PD154's and factory is off on hols until 23rd August......
...and i wanted them for a gig for the 12th but i'll make do with 4 until then as the dancefloor is only 4m x 6m but i wanted puke factor bass if needed.
Thanks for your time Rastaman 
------------- My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers
|
Posted By: rastaman
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 6:13pm
Hey don't take my word for it, it's not like I've ever built them yet.
Was just offering what info I have gleaned from this site and others.
What about the MaxPro drivers from
http://www.pa-direct.co.uk/drivers.htm - Nightfire they
usually have similar specs to the PD's you can probably find a useable
15" there, thats what I'm aiming for when I finally build some 1850's,
they seem to be close to the PD line, at least the 18"'s do.
|
Posted By: norty303
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 6:51pm
Nah, i'm just being stupid really, i'd like to keep them all the same loading and i do love the PD's 
------------- My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers
|
Posted By: soundgodwannabe
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 7:49pm
|
Is it just me? Or is everyone trying to build speakers of their own, trying to do it cheaper rather than better? Almost every subject has got one or more members trying to build these designs with cheaper speakers than what the plans call for (myself included). Is there not someone out there that is building better speakers rather than cheaper speakers? I had to ask myself this question. Do I want cheap speakers (which I have bought and have blown). Or will I take pride in building the speakers in these plans. I am with the understanding that if you build these plans with the recommended speakers that are given that you will not only have great speakers, but you will have great speakers you will be proud to say "Yeah, I built these". This is just my opinion and my soapbox time. If I have offended anyone, it was not my intention. I have spent hours upon hours trying to find cheap woofers for the plans. The time I spent looking for cheaper speakers I could have used building them.
|
Posted By: Dom
Date Posted: 02 August 2005 at 8:19pm
|
soundgodwannabe wrote:
Is it just me? Or is everyone trying to build speakers of their own, trying to do it cheaper rather than better? |
Well said...
The way I see it is by building my own cabs, I can spend my money on components... Why people insist on taking great designs and sticking the cheapest possible drivers in them is beyond me...
------------- "It sounded like a million fire engines chasing ten million ambulances through a war zone and it was played at a volume that made the empty chair beside me bleed."
|
Posted By: norty303
Date Posted: 03 August 2005 at 4:20am
|
Hey, when i said cheap, they're still a £100 driver and a good one at that.
Just perhaps not the most suited to the box which is why i asked.
And if you look, i'm asking because of lack of availability rather than price - i've got no problem sticking my hand in my pocket (deep though they are!)
------------- My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers
|
Posted By: rastaman
Date Posted: 03 August 2005 at 9:46am
soundgodwannabe wrote:
I am with the understanding that if you build
these plans with the recommended speakers that are given that you will
not only have great speakers, but you will have great speakers you will
be proud to say "Yeah, I built these". |
Just curious, but you're in the US too, where PD drivers are very hard
to come by, almost all the Speakerplan designs have a PD driver as
their first choice, so what do you use instead? Or do you import PD
drivers?
|
Posted By: Dom
Date Posted: 03 August 2005 at 3:32pm
|
norty303 wrote:
i've got no problem sticking my hand in my pocket (deep though they are!) |
Lucky you have long arms then...
------------- "It sounded like a million fire engines chasing ten million ambulances through a war zone and it was played at a volume that made the empty chair beside me bleed."
|
Posted By: norty303
Date Posted: 03 August 2005 at 3:34pm
|
Lucky you have long arms then... |
Yup....
Really must get deeper pockets!
------------- My laser stuff: http://www.facebook.com/SubsonicSystems" rel="nofollow - Frikkin Lasers
|
Posted By: soundgodwannabe
Date Posted: 03 August 2005 at 9:55pm
|
I have bought Eminence in the past. I love 'em. But I have also used Carvin speakers. I am finding that the theil measurements are almost identical and the Carvin's are at a lower price. I sacraficed quality by buying some Madison speakers a while back. Great little speakers until something blew the voice coil. It is stuck in open circuit. I bought two more and the went in a matter of days. I think this is where my thread started off and just ended up differntly.
APOLOGIES go out to anyone if I offended them. Was not my intention.  
You know my hairline is starting to look like this guy !!!
Sorry, just thought I would try and share some laughter. But, really looking in the mirror is starting to get scary!
------------- Make the soundman mad and I WILL press the suck button for your band.
|
|