Print Page | Close Window

X3 - Hybrid Horn

Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Plans
Forum Name: New Projects Forum
Forum Description: Forum for new speakerplans projects, in memory of Tony Wilkes, 1953 - 2014
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=38722
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 8:46am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: X3 - Hybrid Horn
Posted By: andariel
Subject: X3 - Hybrid Horn
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 3:59pm
Hello,
 
maybe an interesting project. I got 15" drivers which were a special design for a horn loaded contstructions with very strong magnet system, a large Voice Coil and more than 1/2 inch linear excursion each direction.
 
I did the woodcutting while a friend did the calculations and measurements for my project. After 6 prototypes the fineal result.
Useable up to 200Hz, extreme hard kickbass and also very tight and deep. -6db point at 42Hz.
I prefer the crossover at 160-180Hz. 190Hz is a lambda/4 resonance which should be EQed -3db. Otherwise the system doesn`t need any equalizing.
 
X3 is the name because of 3000W amping power used for one cabinet. With 35Hz lowcut the driver is kept within its linear excursion. The sensitivity is measured with 2V, because 2 drivers parallel so with 1W.
 
Max. SPL calculated around 140db. Even 4000W are possible, but my amps are not capable of this and the benefit is the rise the lowcut to 40Hz... so I prefer deep bass ;)
 
 
 
 
 
And nearly forgotten through the hornloading it becomes more flatten in stacks of 4. Stack of 4 has a sensitivity of 107db flat to 45Hz. -6db at 38Hz.
 
Keep smiling,
Andi.



Replies:
Posted By: space-face
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 5:53pm
What drivers you using?


Posted By: login4
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 5:55pm
looks really good, what drivers were you planning to put in them?




-------------
CELTIC SUBSONIC SOUND SYSTEMS


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 6:05pm
I wrote it above. I`ve used special OEM Horn drivers which aren`t really expensive luckily. I got it from the designer of this Hybrid.  Normally this speakers used for front loaded horns with extreme high compression. Because of this the strong magnet system and a totally stiff cone.
 
Bevor I`ve tested 18Sound 15LW1401. Very good speakers but not as good as the new ones. Now I get 1db more sensitivity, 1db more power handling and below 50Hz 3-4db more max. SPL becuase of excursion. I`d like to say it sounds like a few db, but it`s a difference as day and night.


Posted By: space-face
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 6:22pm
Why'd you go for no expansion at the start of the horn? also do the drivers load in with magnet facing the horn mouth?

sorry for loads of questions!


Posted By: jbl_man
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 6:53pm
Originally posted by space-face space-face wrote:

Why'd you go for no expansion at the start of the horn?
 
I was going to ask the same question.


-------------
Be seeing you.


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 7:20pm
Because it told out to was the best efficiency over bandwith on a given volume. It`s not a typical horn. Also sensitivity is below a good horn. But is goes deep beginning with one cabinat extending when using more. And it`s extremley compact. Output/Truckspace ratio is enourmous.
 
As I remember the original design with that driver on a front loaded horn was flat from 45-200Hz and had an efficiency of 107db with 1x15". But it was a 500 Liter design. This has less than 250 Liter!
 
So for comparison on same volume:
One Horn (500l): 140db max. SPL                    (with 1500W amping)
2 x X3 hybrid (500l): 146db max. SPL               (with 6000W amping)
 
But with given amping of 6000W, you can supply 4 Horns => 150db! but 4 times bigger for transportation. For this I`m talking about max. Output/Truckspace size. And with this efficiency of the hybrid you can do a funeral for a lot of normal frontloaded horns. There are not too many designs delivering more around 100db sensivity at 50Hz in single mode operation. And most of them are limited in low frequency output due to excurision...
 
 


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 8:09pm
102db from two 15's is not that good in my book. 

-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 8:37pm
@MarjanM, maybe you should compare more exactly or measure real subs by yourself. On datasheets you easily can find 102db for 2x15" but not in real world.
 
Compared to this size it`s very good. You must include that this are high excursion drivers with a lot of move mass. Beeing capable of 6db more LF output than a conventional driver.

One driver tested in Bassreflex with same corner frequency and roughly 125l has 94-95db. So there is a gain of 4db only by the enclosure. This it more than double power output!



Posted By: Ibex
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 9:41pm
What are the external dimensions of this 6th order hybrid?
What driver would you recommend for this design, which everybody can buy?


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 10:04pm

I can see nothing to be meant 6th order in this construction.

Rough dimensions by head. 75x75x42cm
 
When using another driver you need a new enclosure. The LW1401 was close in construction, but not exactly the same. But it was the best driver I could find before! For a few drivers feel free to contact, I bought a lot to get em cheap. For all who planning more of them I can give you an TSP Set you have to achieve.


Posted By: MarjanM
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 10:35pm
Originally posted by andariel andariel wrote:

@MarjanM, maybe you should compare more exactly or measure real subs by yourself. On datasheets you easily can find 102db for 2x15" but not in real world.
 
Compared to this size it`s very good. You must include that this are high excursion drivers with a lot of move mass. Beeing capable of 6db more LF output than a conventional driver.

One driver tested in Bassreflex with same corner frequency and roughly 125l has 94-95db. So there is a gain of 4db only by the enclosure. This it more than double power output!



So basically you have a box that have no exact plans, with the unknown driver and some graphs.
Great, that will help us a lot.
Can you explain to me how having a big excursion figures helps in increasing the output for 6db?
If you take any 99db driver and put two of them in a big enough box and tune it correctly you can have 102db with ease. And it can go a lot lower than 50Hz.
Can you explain the theory behind your box? How low do the port is tuning the box? Is it bandpass or just a reflex box? To me it is a simple clam shelf double 15 box with a big port.


-------------
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics
www.mm-acoustics.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713


Posted By: djeddie
Date Posted: 03 May 2010 at 11:20pm
Originally posted by MarjanM MarjanM wrote:


Can you explain the theory behind your box? How low do the port is tuning the box? Is it bandpass or just a reflex box? To me it is a simple clam shelf double 15 box with a big port.


+1 and also looks like a reflex box to me.


-------------
Chas n Dave : it's like Drum and Bass but with beards.             E=mc² ±3dB


Posted By: mobiele eenheid
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 12:09am
Quote I can see nothing to be meant 6th order in this construction
The rear of the driver fires into a chamber connected to the outside world by a hornlike port. The front of the driver has air inside the cone possible acting as chamber. Asides, the front of the driver fires into a very short horn/waveguide. This 6th order alignment can be seen in the measurements aswell, introducing a 10 dB drop orso beyond a certain point.

Quote So basically you have a box that have no exact plans, with the unknown driver and some graphs.
Great, that will help us a lot.
He mentioned the box is 75 x 75 x 42 cm (my rough guess would be 80 x 80 x 45 cm). The former means an external volume of 236 liter, meaning an internal volume of about 190 liter, spread amongst 2 drivers, so 95 liter each. If the picture is to scale, it means the non-expanding port is about 34 cm long, with an area of ~275 cm^2 per driver, then expanding over another 30 cm towards ~1400 cm^2. Meaning 850 cm^2 right in front of the driver. The last 5-8 cm is non expanding.
 
Hornresp input parameters (for 75 x 75 x 42) would look like the following:
S1; 275, S2;275, L12; 0,01, S3; 275, L23; 34, S4; 850, L34; 15, S5; 1400, L45; 22, Vtc; 50000, Atc; say Sd (not important if resonances are masked). Sim'ed as tapped horn off course and remembering to put the entire graph 5-10 Hz to the left.

Quote Can you explain to me how having a big excursion figures helps in increasing the output for 6db?
Theoretically doubling the excursion will bring you an increase of 6 dB. I.e. power compression set aside.

Quote If you take any 99db driver and put two of them in a big enough box and tune it correctly you can have 102db with ease. And it can go a lot lower than 50Hz
A 15", 99dB/W/m driver will do so at 100-200 Hz. At 50 Hz it will most likely drop to 95 dB/W/m.
 

Quote Can you explain the theory behind your box? How low do the port is tuning the box? Is it bandpass or just a reflex box? To me it is a simple clam shelf double 15 box with a big port.
To me it's a tapped band pass horn. I'd say the HR-sim says it all.
 
Best regards Johan


Posted By: Ibex
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 12:26am
Originally posted by mobiele eenheid mobiele eenheid wrote:


The rear of the driver fires into a chamber connected to the outside world by a hornlike port. The front of the driver has air inside the cone possible acting as chamber. Asides, the front of the driver fires into a very short horn/waveguide. This 6th order alignment can be seen in the measurements aswell, introducing a 10 dB drop orso beyond a certain point.
To me it's a tapped band pass horn. I'd say the HR-sim says it all.

(my rough guess would be 80 x 80 x 45 cm)

Best regards Johan


+1

...when I saw this design, at first it reminded me on this:


gzg

thx johan


Posted By: Drapetsoniths
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 2:19am
Wow it looks mean!!
What model/brand is it?


Posted By: FlipC
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 2:56am

Not a Tapped horn. And neither is that TW Audio B30.
-The TW is a knockoff of the EV T18.



Posted By: mobiele eenheid
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 4:37am

FlipC, I took the liberty of taking the schematic diagram of the tapped horn from the patent itself. You can see it in the picture below labelled as number 1. Using my awesome paint-skills, I´ve transformed this schematic diagram into the actual side view of the current design. Though in my personal view, step 2 says it all.

 
http://img163.imageshack.us/i/tappedbph.jpg/">
 
If this is so far from the truth, could you elaborate your though pattern into arguments?
 
 
Best regards Johan


Posted By: Ibex
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 9:57am
Originally posted by FlipC FlipC wrote:


Not a Tapped horn.
Not at all, there is no quarter-wave-tube...

And neither is that TW Audio B30.
-The TW is a knockoff of the EV T18.
So, please explain the differences between both (B30/T18 vs. X3) designs...


For me all of them (X3, B30, T18) are 6th order series tuned bandpass enclosures with a flared flow/coupling optimized port/chamber which take advantage from a little tapped effect... as mentioned by johan.


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 11:35am
@ marjanM: maybe you should not write as much in forums an get back to real measurement stuff.
 
@mobiele eenheid: well explaination, there is nothing to add. Maybe it`s a tapped bandpass horn.
 
But I connect 6th order and bandpass designs with bad transient response, and there ist nothing like this. It sounds like a frontloaded Horn with very hard attack.
 
Yes in the range from 35-50Hz the driver brings simply a lot of more max. SPL due to it`s high excursion, even compared to the 15LW1401 - which has 9 instead of 13mm. And the sacred thing about is to get the sensitivity out of such a long excursion driver. Sensitivity is one thing and like to say it`s good, but low mechanical and thermal power compression maye is some more important.


Posted By: darkmatter
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 12:13pm
It looks a bit like the Beyma SB15. I'm guessing the difference is that this design uses a straight port instead, achieving slightly more LF sensitivity/excursion control in exchange for a peakier response up higher in the range?

Andariel - I think Rog and JSG would both argue that, done right, a bandpass box with sufficiently low group delay will sound great. Maybe you've just got it right here?

The name of this box is just semantics really - it sits on the blurry line between reflex/bandpass RLH/6th order bandpass/ARLS.


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 3:42pm
A 6th order bandpass system is for me with a double resonator system. Is becomes interesting when I achiev at least same SPL as a vented enclosure.
In any cases they have larger group delay and sound worse.
 
A BP 6th order with good group delay is very useless for PA system because of very low output.
 
Maybe we are talking here about a 6th order system, but not with double helmholtz resonator. And I think because of this the design has its impressive impuls reproduction.


Posted By: Ibex
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 5:37pm
It is a double helmholz resonator, but a series tuned and not a parallel tuned one!


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 5:58pm
Sorry not at all.
 
It has only one helmholtz (back volume compliance with hornpath and front volume mass) resonator and this one is very good damped.


Posted By: Ibex
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 6:29pm
Don't you think, that the front volume mass (chamber and port go smoothly into one another) acts like a second helmholz resonator, into the first resonator fires thru?


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 9:19pm
For a serial resonator (I`ve seen such design but doesnt work for music reproduction) need 2 compilances and two moved masses. Maybe the thoughts of 6th order design comes from this misinterpretation?
 
 
 


Posted By: mobiele eenheid
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 11:27pm
Have a look at the impedance plot.
 
Best regards Johan


Posted By: Ibex
Date Posted: 04 May 2010 at 11:57pm
Originally posted by mobiele eenheid mobiele eenheid wrote:

Have a look at the impedance plot.
 
Best regards Johan


+1


Posted By: FlipC
Date Posted: 05 May 2010 at 7:46am
Reason I stated that was because of 2 reasons.
The angle of baffle looks to steep and the path length looks incorrect.
I attempted to guesstimate HR data.
Originally I came close to the 75x75x42. I ended up with 88.9x88.9x45.7. Then I looked at the schematic and it wasnt correct so I adjusted it until it looked correct and got 281 Lt for half box size.  Remember a statement of 500 Lt?

To me this is still a simple manifold.
Though I can see how it looks like a single tuned 6th order. (2 resonate chambers sharing the same port)





Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 05 May 2010 at 12:00pm
The Box Volume is slightly less than 250L.
500l was for comparison with the horn.
 
You should not guess too much like this: (2 resonate chambers sharing the same port)
So you`re telling when using 2 bass reflex cabs parallel they get 6th order. Will you still agree with your comment? And if you`re talking about the front this is not a volume with compilance. Just some added mass which adds to the horn port which becomes virtually longer.
 
I`ll try to get impedance plots.


Posted By: Lasse Lukkari
Date Posted: 05 May 2010 at 7:26pm

I don't like your attitude.



Posted By: Norman
Date Posted: 10 June 2010 at 4:40pm
Where can I find plans/pictures of the project?


Posted By: Drimacoustic
Date Posted: 10 June 2010 at 5:43pm
http://forum.speakerplans.com/new-design-15-tapped-horn_topic33074.html?KW=

-------------
love begins below 40Hz


Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 10 June 2010 at 7:53pm

___



Posted By: andariel
Date Posted: 10 June 2010 at 7:54pm
Sorry you project isn`t what the post is about. We are talking of around 6db more output than you`ll be able to achieve with your driver.
 
For details on this project you can send a PM. I`ll try to give the answers required.


Posted By: SatriaSoundPro
Date Posted: 01 October 2013 at 10:11am
Wink please the scheme b30......regards



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net