Print Page | Close Window

X1 Highpass Filter

Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Plans
Forum Name: X1
Forum Description: Discussion / Questions about the X1 sub
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=611
Printed Date: 19 April 2024 at 12:00am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: X1 Highpass Filter
Posted By: matttcattt
Subject: X1 Highpass Filter
Date Posted: 20 September 2004 at 9:38pm
I know the X1 design should be crossed over at 80Hz, but does it require a high pass filter (at 30Hz for example) to protect the driver from really, really low bass that could cause the driver to (forgotten the proper technical word) "go too far" and damage itself?

-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".



Replies:
Posted By: whitehousejamie
Date Posted: 20 September 2004 at 9:56pm
Ideally, yes.


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 21 September 2004 at 11:38pm

But don't use TOO high slopes for the high pass. High slope filters at that low frequencies will give tremendous group delay....



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 22 September 2004 at 12:08am
What would the ideal frequency/slope be? I would think, as the response of the X1 stops at 30Hz, somewhere between 20 and 30Hz and a slope of 6 or 12 db/octave?

-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: loophole
Date Posted: 22 September 2004 at 12:13am
Originally posted by JD01 JD01 wrote:

But don't use TOO high slopes for the high pass. High slope filters at that low frequencies will give tremendous group delay....



does this apply on digital LSM systems too? if you applied different slopes to the bass and subbass hi and low passes would there be an effect to the g.d. of one band relative to the other


Posted By: Dom
Date Posted: 22 September 2004 at 8:29am

Yes...

You have to remember that every 6db of crossover you add moves the phase back 90 degrees...  If you have say 24 high pass on your subs and an 18db low pass on your bass, they will be 90 degrees out of phase at the crossover frequency...  You can correct for this on an LMS though...



Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 25 September 2004 at 12:21am

You can correct the 'phase pushing' electronically, but you can't undo the delay the crossover introduced.

Asymmetrical filters are 'no good'. Filters should always be acoustically symmetrical. If not you can't get flat response around the crossover frequency. Symmetrical means that if you have a 24dB LR highpass for your mids you should have an according 24dB LR lowpass for your subs. If your top does a 12dB/oct. roll off at 120Hz and you want to cross over at 120Hz it would be a good idea to use a 120Hz 12dB Butterworth highpass for that top and a 120Hz 24dB LR lowpass for the subs (just as a starting point).

You can of course set a 12dB hp at 30Hz and a say 24dB lowpass at 80Hz for your subs. The lowpass and the highpass for the same band do not need to be of the same slope and chracteristic. Crossing over below 80Hz to another sub, like X1 from 30 to 60Hz and HD15 from 60Hz up I also would recommend to stick to lower slopes like 18dB or even 12dB. 12dB LR could be a good thing then.  Every filter will introduce more delay..... the higher the slope, the more....



Posted By: Timber_MG
Date Posted: 25 September 2004 at 9:50pm
One has to considder the acoustical slopes of the cabs and see the final filter as an addition of the electrical and acoustic components. asymetrical filters have their place and not all filter stages have to have the same frequency (though not many controllers allow for this)


Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 26 September 2004 at 9:02pm

Ahhhhh! I just typed in this post and it lost it all and told me I needed to log in! I'll try again...

My planned system includes 2 X1's and 2 X15's per side. I am currently thinking about the crossovers. I am planning to build my own crossovers rather than buy a controller.

If I have an 80Hz lowpass and a 30Hz highpass filter for the X1's, a 2kHz lowpass and a 80Hz highpass filter for the SN 15 MB, all at 12db/oct and a 2kHz highpass filter for the SD 740 N at 24db/oct, will all the drivers be in phase and have the same delay?



-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: Dom
Date Posted: 26 September 2004 at 10:24pm
Originally posted by matttcattt matttcattt wrote:

If I have an 80Hz lowpass and a 30Hz highpass filter for the X1's, a 2kHz lowpass and a 80Hz highpass filter for the SN 15 MB, all at 12db/oct and a 2kHz highpass filter for the SD 740 N at 24db/oct, will all the drivers be in phase and have the same delay?

No is the simple answer....

You will get a delay around the ports on the X1.  You will need to delay the SN15MB to get it in time at the crossover point.

You will then need to delay the SD 740N by the same amount +/- the distance behind/in front the compression driver is than the mid cone.  Obviously this will depend on which horn you've used...

Because you've used a 12db low pass on the mids and a 24db highpass on the tops, they will be 180 degrees out of phase at the crossover point.

 

Best bet is either use some test tones at your crossover points and set the delays by ear or download smaart from siasoft and let your computer do all the hard work for you...



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 27 September 2004 at 12:04am

How much will I need to delay the SN15MB's?

I havent actually built anything yet, but I am planning on using the horn.

How do I work out how much to delay the SD 740N's by?

I havent actuall used anything yet. Wont the two 12db/oct filters in series have the same effect as the one 24/oct filter?



-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 29 September 2004 at 2:47am

@ Timber_MG: That's why I said 'have to be ACOUSTICALLY symmetrical'. That does not necessarily mean 'electronically symmetrical and at the same frequency'....

@ Matttcattt: Even if you leave out the group delay each speaker produces, the answer would be no. That's because you have a highpass and a lowpass on each band (except the HF output which doesn't need a lowpass), but the delay caused by the highpass for the subs won't affect the MF output. So if you have 15ms group delay for the subs highpass and 8ms for the subs lowpass this adds up to 23ms, but a symmetrical highpass for the MF would only show the 8ms......

The only REALLY WORKING way would be to measure the delays. Calculating those values is too complicated by far.... But at least in the bass range a good guess can do better than running without setting delays at all....



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 29 September 2004 at 4:58pm
How would I go about mesuring the delays?

-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: Rog
Date Posted: 29 September 2004 at 5:13pm

I use a anayliser that plots the GD. You can also do it with Smaart.

Put in a tone and then click on the calculate distance button. This then gives you how far and hence the time it is from you.



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 01 October 2004 at 5:55pm

"GD"?

Wow, that Smaart is expensive software. Is it worth it?



-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: Dom
Date Posted: 01 October 2004 at 7:00pm

You can download the trial and use it for 30 days and decide yourself if it's worth it...

And if it takes you longer than 30 days to measure your delays then you've got problems...



Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 12:46am

Originally posted by Dom Dom wrote:

And if it takes you longer than 30 days to measure your delays then you've got problems...

Or a really bad BP6 or higher.... :)



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 04 October 2004 at 7:47pm
LOL. So I need to build the speakers first, design filters later? Ok. Thanks for the advice.

-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 05 October 2004 at 5:46am

It would be a good idea to consider 'filtering options' BEFORE you get your hands dirty.... Just think about the speakers you're going to use. If it's a 15" and a small 1" HF you know for example that you need to crossover the 1" very high (2kHz and above) and that the 15" won't play good that high.... so you know this wouldn't be a good box.

Or you want to build a 15" 3way cab. So you get an 8" for the midrange, now you have to check what's the lowest frequency the 8" can play well.

I don't mean that you should have the crossover ready before the speaker. I just think that you should know what you want first....



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 05 October 2004 at 9:30pm

But the X15 is a 2 way design... A 15" will go up to 2k wont it?

I realise that I need to plan.



-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 08 October 2004 at 3:10pm

I don't think that a 15" speaker should go higher than 1200Hz. Even that is in many cases too much if you want clear mids. It's plain physics. A cone with voice coil has a certain weight. This weight will act like any accelerated mass. The bigger the cone and the VC, the higher the mass. And the higher the frequency, the higher the acceleration. So high frequencies AND big cone add up to 'not that good at all'.

It is NOT about 'mids are weak in SPL' or 'the freq plot isn't flat', it's more a question of details in sound.



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 09 October 2004 at 10:46am

I understand the problem, and I agree, a three way design, or smaller bass driver would be better, but would Rog design a speaker that wouldnt work well?



-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 09 October 2004 at 2:32pm

I think the HF driver has a highpass at 2kHz, but the 15" somewhere around 1100 or 1200Hz or such. This is because the HF driver has a big hump around 2kHz and below and the acoustic crossover frequency is much lower than 2kHz.



Posted By: matttcattt
Date Posted: 10 October 2004 at 8:49pm

Oh.

If the crossover frequencies are set for the designs im using, i dont have to do much planning really.



-------------
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
(and my own bit)
If it is broke, fix it.
(and more)
If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked".


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 10 October 2004 at 9:47pm

Of course, if you build already existing designs, they will perform like intended.

In my case most existing deisgns won't fit my needs.....



Posted By: freddyi
Date Posted: 10 October 2004 at 10:09pm
a diffraction slot filter in front of a hot 15"  would tend to even out hot spot and horizontal dispersion to ~60 degrees off axis - but might introduce a cavity resonance

one might muck with 7"x10" or 8"x11.5" ellipse  - oval could look "naughty" so reason nuff to use (?)

Cardboard Slot on PV http://home.earthlink.net/~buddhaboy2/PVLW - http://home.earthlink.net/~buddhaboy2/PVLW


Posted By: JD01
Date Posted: 11 October 2004 at 4:43pm

This will indeed get us bandpass characteristics. Of course higher freqs will 'escape' because the 'hole' is directly in front of the speaker... but I guess the low mids (100-250Hz) won't be good....

It's not only beaming I was talking about. It's more the fact that the mids, even if the freq plot is smooth, won't be that detailed. I have some really smooth sounding 15/2 type cabs, but it isn't comparable to 10" and smaller mids.....




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net