Garrard sp25's disco driver 80
Printed From: Speakerplans.com
Category: Other Chat
Forum Name: Golden oldies
Forum Description: Post all historic interesting items, stories and photos here (no, not your Nan)
URL: https://forum.speakerplans.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=74857
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 6:54pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Garrard sp25's disco driver 80
Posted By: ollie80
Subject: Garrard sp25's disco driver 80
Date Posted: 02 January 2013 at 10:06am
|
Hi Chaps,
HAPPY NEW YEAR. 
A question which ive been meaning to ask.. What was the difference between a Garrard SP25 and a Garrard SP25 disco driver 80? 
Im guessing they are both belt driven. Was the platter / motor more beefier in the disco driver 80? Im a right in saying the disco driver 80 is called an 80 because it was released 1979/80?
Thanks!
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Replies:
Posted By: jbl_man
Date Posted: 02 January 2013 at 11:06am
Martin will probually know the definative answer to this.
The earlier SP25 MK 3 was idler wheel driven. (rumble city!)
Both SP 25MK 4 and disco driver are belt driven.
SP25 MK4 had a semi-auto function (arm took itself of record and back to arm rest after track finished,and switched off turntable,really annoying function,which i used to "disable" by removing the toothed gear wheel under the platter).
Disco driver was completely manual.(no auto function) It also had a better arm if i remember.
Citronic CL300 is better than both in my opinion,much superior "S" arm.
------------- Be seeing you.
|
Posted By: ollie80
Date Posted: 02 January 2013 at 11:25am
|
Hey JBL, thanks very much for reply.
I used to have two SP25 mk4 built into a custom console. One of the sp25s came from a dynatron music centre.. The other one was sourced from a single deck seperate.
haha yes the semi auto function, even at a young age I used to place the stylus manually on the record!
So I guess Garrard entered the disco market propery with the disco driver 80
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Posted By: Mhamplification
Date Posted: 02 January 2013 at 4:17pm
Yes Ian I know the answer to this one having piles of them around at the moment
SP25 Mk 3 idler drive semi auto deck SP25 MK 4 (IV) idler drive semi auto SP25 MK 5,6 were belt drive
On deck fitted into disco console all the semi auto was diasbled normally by removing a cogged wheel under the platter
the Disco driver was a purpose built deck for disco use Built by Garrard after BSR got in there first with the horrible plastic ones The Disco driver 80 came out in 1980 and was a stripped down version of the SP25 MK 6 No auto mechanism at all no controls only speed If you look at one the chassis is the same as a SP25 with plastic panels covering up the holes in the top panels My favorite deck was the DD80 although the cartridge sliders were a problem especially in hot swetty venues The DD80`s were labelled 36SB underneath i think The same turntable as a 35SB a more upmarket SP25
When I get 5 minutes I will do some pics of the difference between the SP25 mk 5,6 and Disco driver 80 /36SB
|
Posted By: ollie80
Date Posted: 02 January 2013 at 4:20pm
Hiya Martin!! Thanks so much for the answers you have given!! 
Will love to see the pics too. Thanks a billion
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Posted By: Tony Wilkes
Date Posted: 02 January 2013 at 4:22pm
Still reckon that the MII was the best built of the lot.
------------- www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 03 January 2013 at 6:36pm
|
agreed tony screw off head shell first decks i ever had dark green in colour
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 03 January 2013 at 6:38pm
|
used to strip sp25's levers linkages etc so they worked like dd's
|
Posted By: Mhamplification
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 10:24am
The Garrard part number fro the Disco driver is 126SB not 36sb as I put earlier
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 10:30am
|
in fact i remember seeing some consoles of the time fitted with 126sb's,if i remember looked like a sp25 til you got closer then some subtle differences,the arm weight and a different silver t/table centre on the t/table mat,silly how some things stick in your mind
|
Posted By: Mhamplification
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 11:10am
mostyn wrote:
in fact i remember seeing some consoles of the time fitted with 126sb's,if i remember looked like a sp25 til you got closer then some subtle differences,the arm weight and a different silver t/table centre on the t/table mat,silly how some things stick in your mind |
that would have been a 125Sb they were very similar to the Sp25 mk 5 as you say the weight and the number near the start controls etc Ive got some Garrard catalogs somewhere will scan them when I can find the old scanner and post them up
|
Posted By: ollie80
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 5:10pm
Mhamplification wrote:
mostyn wrote:
in fact i remember seeing some consoles of the time fitted with 126sb's,if i remember looked like a sp25 til you got closer then some subtle differences,the arm weight and a different silver t/table centre on the t/table mat,silly how some things stick in your mind |
that would have been a 125Sb they were very similar to the Sp25 mk 5 as you say the weight and the number near the start controls etc Ive got some Garrard catalogs somewhere will scan them when I can find the old scanner and post them up
|
Br great to see those catalogs! It funny, whilst growing up all the turntables I was exposed to were Garrard SP25s! My dads Dynatron music centre (MK4), my first FAL disco console (MKIIIs), and custom console MK4 from the Dynatron and another MK4 from a separtes deck
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 8:22pm
Aha! Garrard, anyone remember the AP76? This is the one I used, with disabled semi auto, idler drive, with a lever that actually started the motor before the pinch wheel engaged, if you pulled it slowly enough. Absolutely fabulous to use. I could still cue records and start them smoothly even when I couldn't stand!!
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 9:31pm
|
yes john with the three paddle switches by the arm,i remember em well
|
Posted By: oldskool
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 9:52pm
Is that the plump rear of a DC 300A I spy on the bottom right of the picture?
------------- Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies
|
Posted By: jbl_man
Date Posted: 08 January 2013 at 10:14pm
oldskool wrote:
Is that the plump rear of a DC 300A I spy on the bottom right of the picture? |
Yes,sure is Lee. I use to dream of owning those back in the 70's,but they were financially out of reach back then...almost double the price of a HH s500d,and four times the cost of a MM ap360.
------------- Be seeing you.
|
Posted By: ollie80
Date Posted: 09 January 2013 at 8:50am
funkyparrot wrote:
Aha! Garrard, anyone remember the AP76? This is the one I used, with disabled semi auto, idler drive, with a lever that actually started the motor before the pinch wheel engaged, if you pulled it slowly enough. Absolutely fabulous to use. I could still cue records and start them smoothly even when I couldn't stand!! |
Are you cueing up the tape deck there John?
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 09 January 2013 at 9:48am
|
looks like nab or 8 track cartridges to me ollie,i'm sure john will enlighten us
|
Posted By: ollie80
Date Posted: 09 January 2013 at 9:53am
wow imaging using 8 track cartridges for cueing! Be ok for background music. My dad was a projectionist and used 8 track for background music during the intermission!
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Posted By: Nachural
Date Posted: 09 January 2013 at 10:42am
|
The NAB players were ok for jingles because they had an auto cue function. There's an interesting article here:- http://radiohistoria.jvnf.org/spotmaster.htm" rel="nofollow - http://radiohistoria.jvnf.org/spotmaster.htm
------------- it's all just cardboard and magnets really
|
Posted By: ollie80
Date Posted: 09 January 2013 at 10:46am
|
Yes they were used in Radio stations for DJ idents wernt they. Nice to have them on a mobile show.
Hi John! Did you have them specially recorded for you? ie your name check etc?
------------- Ollie K Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 10 January 2013 at 4:14pm
|
Yes, to the amp being DC300A, JBL is smack on in confirming, (I couldn't afford one either, my brother lent me the money... £500 in 1974, bought from Sound Pad, Leicester) Now, what speakers was it driving??? Any of the younger members ever heard of Gauss? No to the idea of 8 track, it was NAB cartridge, they cued atomatically with a bleep tone on a track that had no actual output, ran at 7.5 ips, so quality good. The machine was made by SIS of Northampton, they also made the jingles for me I'm trying to remember the name of the guy who did the voiceovers, including sonovox things like "Wonderful Funky Parrot" in Radio London style, I think it was Alan Bowley.....Can anyone confirm?
|
Posted By: Tony Wilkes
Date Posted: 10 January 2013 at 4:40pm
mostyn wrote:
agreed tony screw off head shell first decks i ever had dark green in colour |
Did you ever see the version with the Decca Deram cartridge, it was used in loads of schools around the late 1960's. For a ceramic cartridge it was quite classy.
Tony
p.s. What I used for my first ever DJ experience at school, also using their Grampion (I think) figure of eight Ribbon Mic !!!
------------- www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 10 January 2013 at 4:53pm
|
Yes, Tony, I remember the Deram, a superbly classy ceramic. I had one in an autochanger, a Garrard AT6, which I used for my first D.J. outings, quick change of discs by stacking, then loads of chat after 8 records, as you lifted them off to start again. It was later accompanied a Collaro in my first (home made of course) double deck unit. Calrec microphone, Selmer Treble'n' bass 50 amp, 2 x 12" Celestion speakers. You could get a fiver a night with that.
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 10 January 2013 at 4:55pm
|
my first decks had a pair of dark green s/h mk 2's,made out of ply with flip over stylus,a simple mixer made from a formica fascia,a couple of pots and a few r's with a headphone amp nicked from an old tranny radio and the console covered in red velour fablon Tony!
|
Posted By: Tony Wilkes
Date Posted: 10 January 2013 at 4:59pm
mostyn wrote:
my first decks had a pair of dark green s/h mk 2's,made out of ply with flip over stylus,a simple mixer made from a formica fascia,a couple of pots and a few r's with a headphone amp nicked from an old tranny radio and the console covered in red velour fablon Tony! |
By the way, I live in Cheslyn Hay!!
Tony
------------- www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 10 January 2013 at 5:05pm
|
blimey not far away then which dj's do you know round our way?
|
Posted By: Tony Wilkes
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 3:03am
mostyn wrote:
blimey not far away then which dj's do you know round our way? |
Just the old buggers, Jerry (The Stumble Inn) , Kevin Green, Etc. I used to work in Brum and the Black Country.
Tony
------------- www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 9:23am
|
lol jez!and must pop in to see kev today,i'm of the era of geoff anderson,dave ryder,simo,little winston,matt the mix!
|
Posted By: oldskool
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 5:43pm
|
I never used them myself as went on to direct drives in 1982 but are these the Garrard Disco Drivers? Never heard of the console manufacturer either, how about the rest of the vintage crew, Ian, Gavin, Greg et al does anybody know the name? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Twin-Turntable-Disco-console-/281048983452?pt=UK_Sound_Vision_Other&hash=item416fd3279c" rel="nofollow - http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Twin-Turntable-Disco-console-/281048983452?pt=UK_Sound_Vision_Other&hash=item416fd3279c
------------- Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 5:47pm
|
linear sound carinas,more budget than FAL! i suspect that bsr had folded by these days so not sure who made the turntables though,very cheap looking things,
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 6:00pm
Linear Carina? Looks very brown & sounds like a cracked bell......DUNG!
|
Posted By: mostyn
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 6:04pm
Posted By: Mhamplification
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 8:11pm
oldskool wrote:
I never used them myself as went on to direct drives in 1982 but are these the Garrard Disco Drivers? Never heard of the console manufacturer either, how about the rest of the vintage crew, Ian, Gavin, Greg et al does anybody know the name? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Twin-Turntable-Disco-console-/281048983452?pt=UK_Sound_Vision_Other&hash=item416fd3279c" rel="nofollow - http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Twin-Turntable-Disco-console-/281048983452?pt=UK_Sound_Vision_Other&hash=item416fd3279c
|
Yes they were BSR decks P2** they were used in some of the Thames 2`s as well Not bad decks but no match for the Citronic 300d`s
|
Posted By: GregM
Date Posted: 11 January 2013 at 11:16pm
oldskool wrote:
......Never heard of the console manufacturer either, how about the rest of the vintage crew, Ian, Gavin, Greg et al does anybody know the name?....... |
Nope, I have to say thats a totally new one to me......
 I am smiling at having become part of the 'vintage crew' though...  , us vintage guys need a proper get together somehow! - although I see we are dotted in pretty much every corner of the UK....
Greg
------------- Remember, if you don't want to hear the answer, don't ask the question!
|
Posted By: Tony Wilkes
Date Posted: 13 January 2013 at 10:40am
I worked at BSR for 6 months immediately after leaving school, could not believe that not one single person in the factory had any passion for what they were doing and that included the designers.
I remember in their listening room they had a 401 & SME as a reference.
They had a few interesting prototypes but they were much too late and could not halt the decline.
Tony
------------- www.forteaudio.eu - BMS - db-Mark Processors - Lexon (SAE)
|
Posted By: jbl_man
Date Posted: 13 January 2013 at 11:12am
While we are on the subject of old Garrard turntables,does anyone remember their direct drive disco turntable? it was more or less a copy of the early technics SL1300 (which of course later became the SL1200 with the slider pitch control,instead of the rotary ones).....Garrard introduced it shortly after their belt drive era...just after the Zero 100sb and 86sb and sp25 mk5....i cant remember the model number,it only seemed to be around for a year then vanished.....would have been around 1978-79 i reckon.
------------- Be seeing you.
|
Posted By: Mhamplification
Date Posted: 13 January 2013 at 12:23pm
jbl_man wrote:
While we are on the subject of old Garrard turntables,does anyone remember their direct drive disco turntable? it was more or less a copy of the early technics SL1100 (which of course later became the SL1200 with the slider pitch control,instead of the rotary ones).....Garrard introduced it shortly after their belt drive era...just after the Zero 100sb and 86sb and sp25 mk5....i cant remember the model number,it only seemed to be around for a year then vanished.....would have been around 1978-79 i reckon.
|
Ian was it the DD131
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/GARRARD-DD131-TURNTABLE-/251212932398?pt=UK_AudioTVElectronics_HomeAudioHiFi_Turntables&hash=item3a7d75252e
|
Posted By: jbl_man
Date Posted: 13 January 2013 at 12:40pm
Well done Sir! Yep that's the one Martin,they didnt seem to catch on, (maybe to expensive new?) so doubt if they sold many....people probually just paid the extra few quid and bought the Technics.

------------- Be seeing you.
|
Posted By: jbl_man
Date Posted: 13 January 2013 at 12:47pm
And here is the SL1300,you can see the similarity.

------------- Be seeing you.
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 17 May 2013 at 4:36pm
ollie80 wrote:
Yes they were used in Radio stations for DJ idents wernt they. Nice to have them on a mobile show. Hi John! Did you have them specially recorded for you? ie your name check etc?
|
Long gap in between question and answer, but I've found some of the old jingles and I'm trying to find a way to make them audible, but you can't include audio files, trying to post a link to my website is also causing a problem. try http://www.funkyparrot.co.uk/page8.html" rel="nofollow - www.funkyparrot.co.uk/page8.html ignore the state of the page and click the blue note. It works!
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 24 October 2014 at 7:23pm
|
Hi. New member and stuff. I used to mobile at Nottingham University (my better known disco was "unsound" and after I sold it I set up "universal joint" built mostly out of spare parts.
Unsound used SP25mk1s with Deram cartridges and a custom-built mixer. The best bit was the amp - Radford SC22P preamp and Radford STA100 power amp (2*KT88s per channel). First speakers were 4 Baker Group 50s but we got fed up of blowing them up, then we tried Celestion G18Cs, then Goodmans 12Ps (in two 4*12 columns).
Universal joint used a de-auto'd AT60 and a 2025 with 9TAHCs, a virtual earth mixer I built that was never quite right, and an old Geloso 30 and a Linear 50 (both with 2*EL34s) and speakers were on each side a random 15" and a random 12" that I happened to have lying about - in cabinets made of inch mahogany ply that I got for the price of chipboard when someone ordered it in a local woodyard and then vanished.
Anyway, I'm here about the disco driver 80s. I just bought on ebay a sort of console - no mixer in it - with two disco driver 80s. Alas with 9TAHCs in. Anyway - how do I set up the tracking weight, and how do I get at the cartridge securig screws to change the whole cartridge - the headshell seems not to come off?
|
Posted By: GregM
Date Posted: 24 October 2014 at 7:38pm
Hi Unsound, welcome to the forum
You bagged the £54 'console' then, well done one of us anoraks was going to, I'd only for the SP's alone.
I'm sure there's a 'proper' way to do it, but I tend to:
Slide the whole counter weight towards the back of the arm, moving small amounts at a time until the headshell end lifts off the stay, then move the weight back until the whole arm is floating on the pivot point.
I then hold the silver part of the weight still while turning the black numbered bit around until the 0 (zero) is facing up. This gives you a fully balanced arm with zero weight on the stylus.
Then I turn the whole weight (silver and black bits together) back along the a towards the headshell until 2.5 is facing up - this gives you 2.5 grams weighting on the stylus.
In battle you may need more than 2.5 grams or get away with less, but that is console, club floor, music style and speaker location to console dependant....
------------- Remember, if you don't want to hear the answer, don't ask the question!
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 24 October 2014 at 7:48pm
|
Yes it was that one.
Many thanks. I'd love to get a pair of the white round Derams in there but they are as rare as rockinhorsepoo. Into a really high impedance they sounded quite good and the big thing was the tip mass was really low and the tracking weight quite low (we ran about 2 grams) so when oafs jogged the console the damage to the vinyl was relatively slight! But as I said, it looks as if getting at the cartridge securing screws could be tricky. My other option would be some cheap magnetics and a pair of phono preamps.
I did once see a sort of "gallows" arrangement. The mobile operator had a frame about 7 feet high that was bigger than the console, and the console was suspended on string from teh frame. Result - when oafs jumped about there was no lateral displacement so no jumping. But changing the records and switching teh switches was tricky!
|
Posted By: woody2
Date Posted: 25 October 2014 at 1:11am
unsound wrote:
I did once see a sort of "gallows" arrangement. The mobile operator had a frame about 7 feet high that was bigger than the console, and the console was suspended on string from teh frame. Result - when oafs jumped about there was no lateral displacement so no jumping. But changing the records and switching teh switches was tricky!
|
fairground rides used to hang the decks off bungees
|
Posted By: jazomir
Date Posted: 25 October 2014 at 12:34pm
jbl_man wrote:
And here is the SL1300,you can see the similarity.

|
I had the SL1700 for many years - pretty much a SL1300 but with no control knobs above the Start contol on the RHS. Gave me stirling service for 20 odd years.
------------- For sidefills, can we have two enormous things of a type that might be venerated as Gods by the inhabitants of Easter Island, capable of reaching volumes that would make Beelzebub soil his pants.
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 27 October 2014 at 8:42am
|
Anyone interested in this? NJD twin deck. Sitting at £45 at the mo. Ends today, be quick, if you are...
www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Wow-L-K-Retro-Vintage-70s-80sNJD-disco-turntables-decks-in-North-Norfolk-/321558234205?pt=UK_AudioTVElectronics_HomeAudioHiFi_Turntables&hash=item4ade5d445d
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 7:42pm
|
Gaining slowly.
It appears to be a design function that the arms are stiff to move in and out when on FULL lift. The SP25s did not do that.
One Sonotone 9TAHC is mullered (fork broken). I have sourced a secondhand one after some hunting but I think I will put two magnetics in in stead, really cheap rubbish for now. I no longer appear to own any really high input impedance preamps and trying the surviving 9TAHC into the nearest disco mixer's aux in gave the right level but a truly horrid squawking high-mid. I mean I could run into a 1meg DI box and use the +20DB boost and indeed I have a 4-channel one but it would be a bit Heath Robinson.
I hope that that will not too greatly aggravate the switch-on-and-off-spark-crack from the DPDT (why?) switches the original builder put in. I have got a couple of 0.1muff spark quenchers off ebay, and will bypass the negative side of the DPDT switches and use the quenchers on the positive side.
Original builder also for some eccentric reason wired the DIN output sockets earth 2, left 1, right 5. But the twerp on ebay who sold me some DIN to phonos failed to tell me they were non-standard - let to 1&4 commoned and right to 3&5 commoned, so actually they work with it!
I probably need to source a graphic EQ as well - both of mine are built into PA rigs.
A couple of spare drive belts would probably be prudent, too.
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 9:54pm
|
Of course the SP 25 arms are stiff to move on full lift! You're trying to move them against the resistance of the platform that's lifting them!
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 10:55pm
|
Nope, this is stiffer than that. I used SP25s to run mobile discos throughout the late 60s and early to mid 70s, I know them. On full lift, there was friction from the lifting platform. These feel like the arms are being pinched between an upthrust and a ceiling.
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 11:18pm
|
Lift platform settings been buffered about? Weight fouling deck? Lack of lubrication at top of travel? Pivot bearing dry? Vertical (conical) bearing too tight?
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 11:24pm
|
I'd favour the first - if I could see how to change them! Yes, I expect everything is dry after umdy-um years.
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 04 November 2014 at 11:54pm
If I remember correctly, after around 30 plus years, hundreds of juke boxes and ????pints of beer....I think there might be a tiny Allen screw, adjusting the height of lift. That was my first thought, too. But there should have been gg rather than ff, in the suggestion. Although I advocate no WD 40 on jukes, I'd suggest a tiny drop on the arm spindle & bearings, wiped off and a slight touch of Vaseline, applied. Should sort it. If not, PM me, we can go through it. John.
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 07 November 2014 at 7:49pm
|
Progress? I have found the lift adjusting screws - accessed from the top. They are not allen screws but have slotted heads and the points of them are sprung. Clever stuff. They bear on a plastic platform and the plastic platform is raised by the lift lever.
But the arm still gets stiff with the screws taken right out. So it's not that.
A puzzle is that there is a plastic white screw (even smaller) that goes in horizontally. It looks as if it might adjust the lift-off point or the parking point for the arm if ther was an auto-return. But there isn't an autoreturn. Perhaps a hangover from the SP25 that never got taken off but the screw has clearly been used because the head is slightly gulled. But it's clearly noting to do with this stiffness problem.
Next step remove arm from gimbals. This reveals a larger screw that secures the gimbal assembly to a metal arm underneath - and a VERY thin rod that pokes up through the gimbal assembly. Damned if I know why.
Now here's a funny thing. There's a bit of spring-loaded twist between the gimbal assembly and the metal plate.
Remove bigger screw and put parts CAREFULLY in order so I can put them back again (I hope). There's another washer and a funny plate sort of kidneyshaped that looks as if it might be part of the autoreturn mechanism that isn't there.
Lift off gimbal assembly - and lo! and behold there is the culprit, but I don't know what it does! Going up and down with the plate that the lift arm lifts is a rod or screw with a rubber dum on the top, and a tiny torsion spring round it. That's GOT to be the source of teh spring-loaded twist, but I'm damned if I can see what it does.
And the friction comes because the rubber dum contacts the underside of the gimbal assembly, when the plate that the lift arm lifts lifts. Obviously a design feature. Nothing adjustable about it at all. Lubrication would last about 10 minutes, not a sensible thought. The only guess I can make is that it's designed to let you leave the arm securely positioned when you lift it, for cueing purposes. But since, like the SP25s, the arm comes down sideways when you lower the lift, that's useless as a function. Second thought - could it be something to do with damping when lowering the arm? I think I'll have a closer look at that.
Off at a random tangent - are the headshells the same as Mk IV or V SP25s? It'd be nice to carry a spare headshell with cartridge already mounted.
|
Posted By: funkyparrot
Date Posted: 07 November 2014 at 8:48pm
|
Fantastic! Someone who actually knows what he's doing! Having been an operator, some years ago, I give help on a juke box owner's site. Some of the returns you get are unbelieveable. Suggest things to check on the turntable.... Yes, but I've pressed buttons on the control board.......And the guy who's had all sorts of tracking problems on his vertical player, (One side only) after 3 months, and help from loads of people, finally discovers.....(Fanfare) It's the tension spring!!!!!
Great to know you've sorted it, on reflection, over the allen screws, was I thinking of my AP 76s.....or has my memory been taken over with servicing juke boxes?
Having just re-read your post..."Could it be something to do with damping?"No matter how quickly you released those lifts, the arm would always give a steady descent.
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 07 November 2014 at 9:11pm
|
Still bu88ered to figure out the purpose of the rubber dum and what it's mounted on. That's the bit I thought might be something to do with the damping when the arm is lowered - danged new fangled ideas, the SP25Mk2 had no damping, you had to lower the lever slowly! No, hang on, that was a different deck, I wonder if it was the 2025 or a BSR deck - the SP25 had a quadrant marked "Stop" "Play" and "lift" IIRC.
The very thin thing is a spring. The gimbals are not rigid to the metal plate underneath that the big screw goes in to. Nope, there is spring loaded twist between the two.
Anyway, it's all back together.
And flattery will get you absolutely-----------------------------------------everywhere!
Now for food and a small libation while I cogitate how lucky I am not to have killed myself by playing the thing without ripping it to bits first. Several of the mains wires underneath seem to have been accidentally hit with a soldering iron while the user was soldering something else, and there are a number of live and neutral wires with bare patches due to melted insulation - in close proximity to each other. On Sunday I might rewire it completely - fiddling with the underneath of record decks rather than underneath of girlfriend, much to her annoyance, no doubt.
Other watchers, a commercially built twin deck also with Disco Driver 80s in just sold on ebay for £58 (I dropped out at £57) and it was fully working with a 100 watt amp in - collect only from Brighton.
|
Posted By: unsound
Date Posted: 09 November 2014 at 12:00pm
|
Grumph. Switch-on-thump eliminated by the spark quenchers after bypassing the neutral side of the DPDT switches. BUT on the one deck that I currently have a 9TAHC in, I seem to have only left hand channel out. But if I turn the tracking weight up a bit it sounds surprisingly solid - and apparently the mixer I'm using is not RIAA compensated AND is high impedance on the "phono in".
Step 1 - switch the channel inputs round. If I then have right channel only, it's not a mixer fault.
Step 2 - use a different input lead.
Step 3 SHOULD logically to be to switch the wires in the DIN sockets that are the out of the deck. but that's a pfaff.
Step 4 - put the cartridge carrier in the other deck - if it's still left channel only it's either a high resistance on one of the sliding contacts - or the 9TAHC (more probable than the stylus). Grrr, since although I know a man who has some he wants £25 each used and £50 each NOS. Daft since a modern magnetic cartridge is less - but then I'd have to put RIAA preamps in the deck, and those cost money.
|
|