Sinai RC1

I've recently got back into building boxes. I'm a cabinet maker by trade and use to be a sound engineer all be it a very junior one. I was there on the night in question. And I also heard Sinai a couple of days before at green works and they smashed it. Since then I've heard a couple of other rigs using the same box designs as Sinai. Sinai with kicks is enjoyable to be shaken by and I love the hype that comes with it. This can only be good for the UK scene. I love the tops in particular the comps and waveguides used. But I have also heard the type 0 parafex which is very simple to build less materials and sounds better imo. I recently built one in under two hours including drawing and cnc programming  so that kind of makes the golden formula a bit of a early adopters mistake. And the designer himself admitted this earlier in the thread. But Sinai as a sound is still one I want tickets to hear and I get excited listening to it. And by the amount of people that know the Sinai name they are getting a return on their investment. It would be boring if every rig sounded the same.

Which ISNT "Why is RC1 so loud", but:

"Why don't 6 21s sound so amazing.

And

"Why is MMJ so salty about obvious issues, rather than taking em on, to improve his boxes..

Edit: The Orbit shifter is exremely suprising for a single FLH. Wow!

So the "best cab alive, even better than the best golden formula which is no longer the best" is down -5,9dB @ 37Hz against my best 1x18" cab. So far so good. One would conclude that my bass is the best alive then, but i dont adopt the paraflex logic. Therefore, it is just another big subwoofer, it is harder to not get that output out of that volume than getting it .