![]() |
the t.racks FIR DSP 408 or dB-Mark XCA48 PLUS V2 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
lickweed ![]() Old Croc ![]() Joined: 02 May 2009 Location: leyton Status: Offline Points: 2454 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 21 January 2023 at 9:16am |
Anyone got experience with both units?
How do they compare? Thanks
|
|
http://www.liquidsound.co.uk/
|
|
![]() |
|
levyte357- ![]() Old Croc ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 July 2012 Location: UK, South East Status: Offline Points: 7958 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have had a number of dB-Mark LMS, culminating with XCA48, and can safely say the unit gave me exactly what I needed, the sound quality (on mids and sub), of the the reverred BSS 366t, with more modern features, and ease of use. IMHO, no way a Thomann rebrand would match it.
After the dBmark, I wouldn't even consider Klark Teknik, would probably be looking at XTA. |
|
Global Depopulation - Alive and Killing.
|
|
![]() |
|
lickweed ![]() Old Croc ![]() Joined: 02 May 2009 Location: leyton Status: Offline Points: 2454 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That what i was thinking ,but would like to confirm first hand from someone that used both units.
Shame db mark doesn't have FIR . Andy could you confirm how many PEQ are on inputs and outputs on DB-mark? thanks
|
|
http://www.liquidsound.co.uk/
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |