"To DUAL or NOT to DUAL, THAT is the question." |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
FUBARD303
Registered User Contentiously righteous Joined: 29 September 2008 Location: Allup Inyo MOUF Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 21 May 2009 at 3:50am |
|
Yes I searched and nothing....
What are the advantages and disadvantages regarding diferent set-ups of ported subs? Seems like there's no real consistancy in the big leagues. JBL seems to like the dual cab with a single slotted port yet EAW likes to pair-up singles (dual box with isolated chambers per driver) with multiple round ports while 18-SOUND's design is a single with a slotted port. WHAT GIVES!? Do these diferences give a box difering responces? What do they do? Thanx! |
||
"Always look on the bright side of life" -Brian
|
||
jethrocker
Old Croc Joined: 07 June 2006 Location: Chiapas, Mexico Status: Offline Points: 1942 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Really not a lot in it. It's all about the same really, volume per driver and port volume/dimensions per driver is what makes the response. Positioning of ports in relation to cabinet walls, corners etc can affect the tuning and therefore response. Many people build a box with the simmed values then tweak the port length or volume a little to fine tune by ear.
The decisions made by the big manafacturers will be made in about the same way, but if you're in any doubt and want to be sure of things there are plenty of plans for reflex cabs, doubles and singles with recommended drivers, the g-sub here for example, or B&C designs. As for advantages/disadvantages between singles and doubles..all depends, if you're ahire company doing big gigs with big transport then doubles might be easier to load and transport, if you're a one man sound then singles will be easier to deal with and two singles=one double sound wise. |
||
levyte357
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 10 May 2004 Location: UK, London Status: Offline Points: 11743 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
+1
Exactly what I had. But I don' t think anyone would build 2x BCsub18 as a single though. I also think 2x Bcsub18 would handle a Gsub, as less bracing, means more chamber, and its more chamber per driver anyway. |
||
"Who am I? I'm the guy who does his job.. You must be the other guy".
|
||
Peter Jan
Young Croc Joined: 16 December 2008 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 1019 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
There's one downside for having 2 or 3 speakers in one chamber. If one speaker fails, the tuning shifts and with that the behaviour of the remaining speaker(s) in that cab. Worst case the remaining good speaker(s) fail too. Not a real problem in low power use, but definately an issue when running full throttle.
|
||
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Good point if one speaker fails in a reflex enclosure then the tuning will drop way down, and dramatically (depending on how far the tuning drops) increase excursion at the previous tuning frequency.
edit:typo Edited by Jake_Fielder - 21 May 2009 at 12:51pm |
||
bitzo
Registered User Joined: 20 November 2007 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 977 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
but...if one speaker fail, this work like a passive radiator?
|
||
jethrocker
Old Croc Joined: 07 June 2006 Location: Chiapas, Mexico Status: Offline Points: 1942 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Might do to an extent, but the tuning of the box would still have changed dramatically. TBH the most likely result would be the other driver dying shortly after.
|
||
Peter Jan
Young Croc Joined: 16 December 2008 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 1019 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You're assuming the bad speaker has just an open coil, no rubbing... Yes, that would make it some kind of passive radiator, but even than the remaining speaker(s) get to "see" a very different situation on a mechanical level. A passive radiator is not just the same speaker without magnet and coil. Passive radiators have very different parameters than the speakers they are paired with in a cab. The way to simulate and calculate a cab with a passive radiator is as different as doing that for reflex cabs versus bandpass cabs and so on. The chance that the remaining good speaker(s) find themselves in a somewhat favorable situation if another speaker fails, is soooo rare that you better not count on your speakers to survive if things are going full power. Of course things are not so bad that it's absolutely not-done to put two or more speakers in one chamber cabinet, half the world is doing it that way and get away with it too. It's one of those so called "calculated risks" in speaker building. Edited by Peter Jan - 21 May 2009 at 7:16pm |
||
Steak'n'ale
Registered User Joined: 31 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 165 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thought the double buisness was all about getting an extra 3dB from doubling Sd. Don't you lose that once you give them their own little compartment within the cab?
|
||
Ay, Uncle Owen I'm off down't Tochie Station t'pick up some power converters
|
||
FUBARD303
Registered User Contentiously righteous Joined: 29 September 2008 Location: Allup Inyo MOUF Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
"Always look on the bright side of life" -Brian
|
||
Deadbeat
Old Croc Joined: 12 March 2008 Location: Singularity Status: Offline Points: 3167 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Nah, it's all about the coupling.
|
||
Away on extended leave.
|
||
Peter Jan
Young Croc Joined: 16 December 2008 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 1019 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It makes no difference for each speaker on it's own if it sits in a seperate compartment with a certain tuned port or with two speakers in a shared ( double net volume of a single cab ) compartment and ports of double surface and the same length as for a single cab. If you feed two speakers, let's say in a 200 liter cabinet, than that gives you a 3dB gain over that same power fed to a single speaker in a 100 liter cabinet, all things equal, net volume/ port surface and port lenght tuned for that speaker. In case of the two speakers fed with double power, you get 6dB gain in total. 3 dB from doubling speaker/cabinet (that's the coupling part) and 3 dB from double power (pretty obvious). You might say :" oh... just give each speaker more cabinet volume and I get so much dB for free". Well... that's not how porting works... You can get more low extention with more volume for each speaker, but that means also changing the tuning (lower) to get that low extention, read : longer port for the same port surface compared to a smaller cabinet. Benefit : more low extention. Downside : less power capability due to Xmax reached sooner. No free meal here... Xmax is proportional to frequency. Lower frequency equals more speaker excursion to get the same SPL. Now a longer port for same port surface is just the opposite from doubling cab volume/port surface for one speaker and having the same port length... just what happens if one speaker fails in a double speaker/shared chamber cabinet. The tuning shifts roughly half an octave up (not down as someone mentioned before) and the speaker's power capacity goes down, because the port no longer "helps" the speaker to make SPL in the lower region. The port does however boost things higher up, where it's not wanted, so the normal more or less flat respons gets seriously messed up on top of everything else. Any change in one of the parameters involved with porting , cab volume or port length/port surface, changes the respons of the whole system, not just SPL. On a side note : using another speaker is again another set of close-related parameters to consider in simulations and calculations. Edited by Peter Jan - 21 May 2009 at 11:17pm |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |