![]() |
who makes amps for RCF boxes - is it Powersoft ? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Author | ||
jammin75 ![]() Old Croc ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 July 2012 Location: west midlands Status: Offline Points: 2363 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
i have a db es 1002 which i use for small tite space gigs can the amp module be repaired ?
|
||
feel the vibes !!! "Who Feels it Knows it" Strong like Lion
|
||
![]() |
||
cravings ![]() Old Croc ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 January 2007 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 7423 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've stuck cheap p-audio 12s into art 312s and they've fitted ok. Just saying.
|
||
![]() |
||
snowflake ![]() Old Croc ![]() Joined: 29 December 2004 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 3093 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
although these resistors were undersized and therefore failed, it is a testament to their consistency and qc that they all failed within weeks of each other ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
APW ![]() Young Croc ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 November 2012 Location: Kent, UK Status: Offline Points: 1161 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yep, amazing consistency and under normal use they would have probably never fail but running 24/7 for several years sent them over the edge. With regarding the replacement driver, It was a long time ago, the shop has been closed for over 10 years, the woofer had a slightly larger than normal (for the time) 12" chassis, and the only drivers what would fit were other RCF drivers that due to the RCF/Mackie fallout were not available, We considered getting adapters machined up but the client didn't like the price. Ironically about a month after they were replaced, RCF sorted out its service network and the re-cone kits became available again. Edited by APW - 14 April 2022 at 5:03pm |
||
![]() |
||
kedwardsleisure ![]() Old Croc ![]() Joined: 20 January 2009 Location: Staffordshire Status: Offline Points: 4889 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've got a plate amp from a JBL PRX just come in last night, together with another from a QSC k-series. I'll let you know which one wins on repairability!
![]() |
||
Kevin
North Staffordshire |
||
![]() |
||
Earplug ![]() Old Croc ![]() Joined: 03 January 2012 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 7098 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Definitely this. Diagnostics on a high density board is a lot more difficult & time consuming. And try source some of the custom transformers that a lot use. Not easy. |
||
Earplugs Are For Wimps!
|
||
![]() |
||
speakerguy1 ![]() New Member ![]() Joined: 06 October 2023 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
DB technologies is who makes the amps in later rcf products. I think the original class AB amps used in the First art series and Mackie speakers were built in house by rcf.
After years of experience I have found that there is nothing like the first amps that Rcf made. I have had almost every new Rcf speaker and they sound good until you go back and listen to some of their older products and you will be blown away. the dynamics, transients, quality and power are unmatched by the the new class D models. the new class D amps from Rcf are definitely better than most other class D amps on the market and they sound fine but when I put my Rcf art 7 series next To my Mackie Srm 450 v1 (made by Rcf) they couldn't hold up. the Mackies have such precision and the imaging is out of this world along side all of the other analog characteristics, the new products sound somewhat week and flat even with 1400 watts that they are rated at. I also recently purchased the new art 945a. I wanted to give them a try hoping that maybe they have advanced the digital amps after 20 yers of development. also they have new Fir phase filters. Sadly there doesn't seem to be much of a difference. they definitely Sound better than my art 7 and art 4 series but still the Mackies have an edge when you do a side by side comparison. it just sucks that the 945s cost me nearly 5 grand and they still aren't as good as the OGs. it seems no matter how much you spend, old School equipment wins. |
||
![]() |
||
FOO ![]() Young Croc ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 December 2018 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 748 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hold up... you prefer a Mackie srm450 mk1 over a RCF Art 7?
I would really like to know what 7 series you got there. I have directly compared the Mackie srm450 mk1 with RCF ART732a mk4. And others at the same time. The mackies can't keep up SPL wise without sounding distressed. And sound quality is limping along. 732a mk4 runs circles around that Mackie box. |
||
![]() |
||
lickweed ![]() Old Croc ![]() Joined: 02 May 2009 Location: leyton Status: Offline Points: 2485 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
+1 , 945a is way better and louder box then srm450 mk1
|
||
http://www.liquidsound.co.uk/
|
||
![]() |
||
KDW32 ![]() Registered User ![]() Joined: 09 April 2010 Location: Green Hell Status: Offline Points: 474 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Same as. I'm not sure srm450 was ever a good speaker. It was bad as a DJ monitor.
|
||
![]() |
||
Wikl109 ![]() Young Croc ![]() Joined: 29 April 2009 Location: Yorkshire Status: Offline Points: 960 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The original SRM-450 wasn't a bad box at all, quite ground breaking for it's time infact. However it was voiced with that typical 'American PA' shouty upper midrange character, like all the Peavey and JBL boxes from that era sounded.
I'm aware the original 450 was basically a cab designed by RCF. I don't like modern class D amp modules, all manufacturers seem to use them now. Be it American, Chinese or European. I don't think they are all that unreliable just much harder to repair when they go wrong. |
||
Cheers, Chris.
|
||
![]() |
||
speakerguy1 ![]() New Member ![]() Joined: 06 October 2023 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I forgot to mention a few points. First off I wasn’t talking about max SPL and loudness of the speakers. The Srm 450 has a class AB amp and once you switch into class B you loose quality and Power. The newer Rcf’s will handle higher SPL levels better. My main purpose for them isn’t high output applications. I’m using the srm 450s for a high res application. I’m also using them crossed over with Rcf subs, they have set EQ and also a preamp/DAC. Under these circumstances the class AB amplifies perform better. They produce a better soundstage, dynamics and imaging. with high res lossless, Dolby atmos, MQA and DSD audio they deliver a much better experience than the class d amplifiers do.
I understand that for most people new RCF speakers are more ideal. They are better for high output live applications and stand alone use (without subs). Also reliability is better. And they handle better when pushing max SPL levels. I was simply talking about differences between class AB and class D amplifiers. Everyone has different uses and different uses call for different products. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |