1850 Vs. Martin Audio WSX |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
justamadman
Registered User Joined: 13 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1118 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 26 March 2008 at 2:50pm |
both void loaded, outdoors, lots of people, dnb and breaks, opinions please
|
|
in front of the bass bins baby
|
|
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
justamadman
Registered User Joined: 13 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1118 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
safe jake
|
|
in front of the bass bins baby
|
|
Jake_Fielder
Old Croc Joined: 08 October 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4231 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I havent read it recently so it might not answer your question properly, but hopefully it will help a bit....
|
|
tb_mike
Old Croc Joined: 01 October 2004 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 2744 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
on paper,for dnb and breaks,id prefer the wsx. Need the 40hz F3.
Never heard an 1850 down here though. |
|
MarjanM
Old Croc Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7810 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
+ 1 on WSX
|
|
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
|
Michaeltandy
Registered User Joined: 12 September 2008 Location: Birmingham Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
New to the forum but will be posting a lot more and also building my own boxes, subs and tops, plan to follow soon, but work with 4x martin audio wsx subs and 4x martin w8c mid/hi, and had the choice of that a nexo and void system and went with the martin, the tops are beautiful and sweet and the subs are just lovely on the chest.
|
|
m.j.tandy
|
|
everdark
Registered User Joined: 08 April 2007 Location: Russian Federat Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
i've tested wsx with 1850 drivers a month ago. no miracles. sounded awfull. hard to carry
|
|
music is the only language I really know
|
|
CHAMPION
Old Croc Joined: 30 September 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3667 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WSX all the way
|
|
Sticks n Stones
|
|
Static Age
Old Croc Joined: 14 November 2005 Location: Oxfordshire Status: Offline Points: 1652 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
but from a DIY point of view the 1850 horn is alot easier build.
has anyone built or have any thoughts on this
Link courtesy of Tekasis
|
|
|
|
ceharden
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 05 June 2005 Location: Southampton Status: Offline Points: 11776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
They are different horns so it depends what characteristics you want.
The 1850 horn will have a harder sound, possibly slightly louder but limited in it's low end frequency response. The WSX is more of an all-rounder with a longer horn path and therefore more low extension. For hard dance music the 1850 is probably what you want but the WSX will sound good with a wider range of music and definitely cope with DnB better than the 1850. |
|
Michaeltandy
Registered User Joined: 12 September 2008 Location: Birmingham Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've been messing around a lot this weekend at the works unit, We have a a couple of dual 18" subs with the speakers facing each other inside the cab in a V, Although we are talking about the 1850's and WSX sub, if you want sheer battering ram of low end stick a couple of 1000 watt rms 18' subs together and see what happens, when i get the chance i will plan them up on spec sheet, see what you guys think.
|
|
m.j.tandy
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |